As if you have an IQ high enough to spot intelligence.
#39 | Posted by lfthndthrds

For purposes of this discussion, all you need is an IQ high enough to spot a man who has given up on finding happiness in life, and blames everyone but himself for it.

Did your dick fall off? I'd be mad too.

You seem more like the kind who turned his crippling DUI into a million dollar payout, but now you wish you'd died.

"Define due process for deportation."

You used to pretend to support the Constitution.

Under the Constitution, Due Process isn't different for deportation.

"Where's your outrage for Federal overreach?"

Did they arrest Roger Stone again?
He's keeping his powder dry for that.

Yes, however the doctrine does not empower cities to obstruct the enforcement of federal law.
#50 | Posted by BellRinger

Which Federal laws are being blocked?
Be specific.

They can't say what they are for, only what they are against.
As I am now living through this, and by this I mean the rise of a dictatorship,
I can see a lot more clearly, playing out in front of me, why this keeps happening.
Why people don't learn. Why people are so insistent on slogans rather than conversation.

If it doesn't fit on a bumper sticker it's too complicated for them.
You can't run a civilization like that.
Meanwhile, Republicans cheer for Trump's De-Ba'athification of the Federal Government.

You know what would cause, but ultimately clean up, gun violence in Washington, D.C.?

If Trump sent the military into the black neighborhoods and took all the guns away.

I can't see Republicans really opposing that.

"Now tell us who murdered those victims."

^
Most blacks are murdered by blacks, just like most whites are murdered by whites.

"who's crime bill targeted young black males for lengthy sentences more than anyone else?"

So now you're telling us that targeting young black males for lengthy sentences actually made crime in D.C. worse, thirty years later.

You are simply not a smart person. You're not even of average intelligence.

"You losers just want to bitch because someone is actually making an effort to clean it up."

He's not making any effort to clean it up.

Nor is his effort to clean it up in response to a request from anyone in D.C. government to help.

So, you're really just completely working with made up facts here.

"The point is D.C. has been a crime infested ------ hole for a long time."

Right so there's no sudden "emergency" and Trump is just making that part up.

The fundamental change that Trump delivered to the billionaires, that Biden did not, is a massive redistribution of wealth upwards to the billionaires.

Now, why Republicans voted for that, is the kind of thing political scientists will spend their careers writing about.

And part of the reason is you can't just get LftHndThrds to answer "Why did you and so many other Americans who aren't billionaires vote for a massive redistribution of wealth upwards to the billionaires?" and get a straight answer. You get the a Definitely Not Straight But Hasn't Figured That Out Yet answer involving Bathrooms, Hair Sniffing, and Truck Stops.

I think, when the dust settles, it was easier to give their money away, than accept gay people and trans people and immigrants and women as equals.

"California farmers"

Do farmers pick crops, or does "farmers" mean "owners" who don't really perform the bulk of the labor?

Are these "California farmers" Proletariat or Bourgeoisie?

Democrats love their billionaires.
#9 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Republicans love them more.
Republicans nominated one for President.

Joe Biden to billionaires in 2020 "nothing will fundamentally change"
#9 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Tell us about the fundamental change is Trump bringing, with his Loyalty Ratings.
Will citizens be getting Loyalty Ratings too? Will I get points just for being white? Will people who donated to Democrats get be sent to camps?

These are the fundamental changes you voted for.
So tell us about the bright future coming our way, thanks to Trump.

"Biden warned of DC crime crisis in 1992"

LOL.

"Do African Americans at least deserve as many murders and homicides per capita as in your neighborhood?"

Deserve?
Blacks are far more likely to be murdered than whites.

"A pro-Russian propaganda group"

Andrea, A Mattress, congratulations on the career upgrade!

Most Republicans still support Trump, even if his name is in the Epstein Files.

The other Republicans will fall in line, because to be a Republican is to make yourself a Beta to an Alpha Leader like Trump.

Don't fall off the roof! But if you do, Eberly will put you in his Thoughts and Prayers.

Eberly believes in the power of Republican Thoughts and Prayer. It's a comfortable life.

Lftnthrds is also a pedo defender
#22 | Posted by hamburglar

Lftnthrds is a pedo supporter.

You're pissed off perpetually
As I said ... ..you're moping around like you lost.
You're outright admitting it.
#99 | Posted by eberly

We, as in America, did lose.
We lost significant funding for cancer research that would have saved lives.
That affects you too. You'd just rather not admit it, so you don't.
So you'll just keep shooting the messenger with spitwads.

"So I joined the Marines"
"So did Boaz"
#94 | Posted by eberly

I thought Boaz was Army.
Biiiig difference between Army and Marines.

And you're too big of a ----- to stand up for a fellow soldier when his service is being trashed.
#102 | Posted by eberly

Is his fellow soldier too big of a ----- to stand up for himself?
Is his fellow soldier literally in a wheelchair, is that where this is going?

"The sandwich thrower is guilty of assault"

The trial hasn't happened yet, so no, he's not actually guilty of assault yet.

Perhaps civilians should get the same Qualified Immunity that cops get. There's no training or law that specifically states throwing a sandwich is a crime.

"You must be a Nancy Boy if you find mostly well behaved tourists walking through the Capital so triggering"

Is "mostly well behaved" when all you do that isn't well behaved is smear ---- on the walls?

It's your distinction, "Mostly well behaved." Tell us what parts of the behavior weren't good, okay?

You think trumps toothpaste is sensationally wrong and illegal and unprecedented.
#93 | Posted by eberly

Well it is certainly illegal. It violates the Emoluments Clause.

And it's certainly unprecedented.

Wrong, that's for you to decide what is right and what is wrong. If you can't form an opinion about right and wrong, tell us what's holding you back and we'll see if we can help you overcome that obstacle.