Wednesday, August 07, 2024

Clarence Thomas Breaks with Supreme Court over Trump Trial Lawsuit

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas broke with the majority of the Supreme Court on Monday in a ruling that prevented the state of Missouri from suing the state of New York over Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's prosecution of former President Donald Trump.

Posted by Corky at 08:30 AM | 8 COMMENTS | permalink

More

Comments

Clarence is playing his, "Pardon me! Pardon me, please!" cards these days.

He made need it given all the new findings of the bribes he's been given.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2024-08-05 06:42 PM

---- that paid off pile of ----.

#2 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-08-05 07:07 PM

Of course, he did.

There's a reason he should have recused himself from the POTUS immunity case.

#3 | Posted by jpw at 2024-08-05 07:07 PM

Thomas has been on sale for so long he should change his name to Clearance Thomas.

#4 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-08-06 07:49 AM

Clarence Thomas' Supreme Court Move Leaves Legal Experts Stunned

While the Supreme Court ruled that Missouri had no right to take the case, both Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito, a fellow conservative, said it did.

MSNBC legal analyst Lisa Rubin wrote on X, formerly Twitter, that Thomas and Alito's decision was "stunning," especially given the Supreme Court's decision in this year's mifepristone abortion pill case, in which it ruled that parties not directly affected could not take a case.

"It's stunning that Thomas and Alito would have allowed Missouri to file suit against New York due to the gag order in the hush money case, especially given a unanimous court's tough talk on standing in the mifepristone case," she wrote.

www.newsweek.com

#5 | Posted by Corky at 2024-08-06 07:44 PM

Ya know... it's funny how Clarence thinks himself all big and bad... but truthfully Anita's testimony against him decades ago created more social change for women and others in the workplace... more so than any of his Supreme Court decisions for or against "DEI". It was stunning how things were different after that case. Men are still beeching about it. silly babies.

Most businesses got the clue and didn't need legal intervention... because it was the decent thing to do... some didn't and paid the price whining all the way.

He talks $#!t... conservatrons like that... his opponents don't and force things change... let's use him again to make a change. Just keep framing his stupid.

#6 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2024-08-07 09:25 AM

Anita Hill warned us.

#7 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-08-08 08:28 AM

While the Supreme Court ruled that Missouri had no right to take the case, both Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito, a fellow conservative, said it did.

MSNBC legal analyst Lisa Rubin wrote on X, formerly Twitter, that Thomas and Alito's decision was "stunning," especially given the Supreme Court's decision in this year's mifepristone abortion pill case, in which it ruled that parties not directly affected could not take a case.

When you view it from the perspective of Clearance Thomas and Alito want to retire to avoid more scrutiny of their corruption this double standard makes perfect sense. They want an orange pedo presidency to appoint more unqualified and corrupt justices.

#8 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-08-08 12:28 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Another Pregnant Texas Woman Dies (68 comments)

Drop Box Fire in Tight HOR Race: 100s of Ballots Destroyed (48 comments)

Trump's Puerto Rico fallout is 'spreading like wildfire' in Pennsylvania (36 comments)

George W. Bush's Daughter Barbara Breaks Silence on Election (29 comments)

Bezos Tries to Defend the Indefensible (26 comments)

American Economy Has Left Other Rich Countries in the Dust (21 comments)

US Military Wrestles with How to Deal with Jan. 6 Trumpers (21 comments)

Elon Musk Makes Shocking Confession on His Plans After Trump Victory (18 comments)