Scientific American Editors - In the November election, the U.S. faces two futures. In one, the new president offers the country better prospects, relying on science, solid evidence and the willingness to learn from experience. In the other future, the new president endangers public health and safety and rejects evidence, preferring instead nonsensical conspiracy fantasies. That is why, for only the second time in our magazine's 179-year history, the editors of Scientific American are endorsing a candidate for president. That person is Kamala Harris.
Drudge Retort Headlines
Mossad Weaponizes Hezbollah Pagers and Cellphones (162 comments)
Migration to US Through Panama's Jungle Cut by 80 Percent (41 comments)
Fed Cuts Interest Rate (20 comments)
Republicans Bracing for Damaging Story on North Carolina Governor Candidate (16 comments)
Survey: Gen Z Workers Easily Offended, Unprepared (16 comments)
Yes, Trump Started the Fire. and Everyone Knows It. (16 comments)
Florida Sheriff 'perp Walks' 11-year-old After Threatening Shooting (15 comments)
Trump Lied About Pet-Eating Hatians After Told Not True (15 comments)