Scientific American Editors - In the November election, the U.S. faces two futures. In one, the new president offers the country better prospects, relying on science, solid evidence and the willingness to learn from experience. In the other future, the new president endangers public health and safety and rejects evidence, preferring instead nonsensical conspiracy fantasies. That is why, for only the second time in our magazine's 179-year history, the editors of Scientific American are endorsing a candidate for president. That person is Kamala Harris.
Drudge Retort Headlines
Gaetz Withdraws (65 comments)
Gaetz Sent over $10K in Venmo Payments to Women who Testified (33 comments)
Mike Johnson Institutes Transgender Bathroom Ban for U.S. House (30 comments)
Murdoch's News Corp Accused of Undermining Democracy (24 comments)
RFK Jr. Compared Trump to Hitler (22 comments)
Poll: Americans Remain Divided on Key Campaign Promises (21 comments)
Nikki Haley Trashes Trump Picks RFK Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard (21 comments)
Pam Bondi Picked for AG After Gaetz Withdraws (20 comments)
Hegseth's Sex Assault Accuser 'remembers saying no a lot': police (18 comments)
Republicans on Ethics Panel Vote to Block Gaetz Report (17 comments)