Thursday, October 24, 2024

Election Crimes Have Consequences

If you're the type of person who is willing to help Donald Trump try to cheat in order to win an election, yesterday was a disheartening day for you, as three different folks of that description got smacked upside the head by the courts.

More

Comments

The lesson here could not be more plain: Try to screw around with the election, and you will pay a price (while your Dear Leader, Donald Trump, will not lift a finger to help you). We recognize that some Trumpers are True Believers, and care not a whit about consequences. However, surely some would-be troublemakers must be taking note of the fates of Giuliani, Griffin, Judd, et al., and noticing that they all got to pay a price while not actually accomplishing anything electorally. Maybe that will make some stop the stealers think twice before sticking their necks out. (Z)

#1 | Posted by Hans at 2024-10-23 07:08 AM

"Maybe that will make some stop the stealers think twice before sticking their necks out."

To be able to think twice they would have to be able to think first.

#2 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-10-24 04:29 PM

I have no doubt that if the Washington DC trials around Jan. 6 ever actually get going, it will be shown that the Trump gang really and truly conspired to overturn the election, by hook or by crook.
Trump complains a lot, but really, the system is really rigged to protect him from his three felony trials in three jurisdictions.

#3 | Posted by Hughmass at 2024-10-25 07:32 AM

It will be apparent come Nov 5th that Fat Nixon's election crimes won't matter.

He is already previewing that if he wins his first act will be to obstruct justice. Will the GQP hold him accountable for that?

Nope.

They owe their fealty to him first before the nation and before the rule of law and before our national security.

They are a joke.

#4 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-10-25 08:52 AM

They didn't in 2020, that's how we got the illegitimate dementia patient that had to drop.

#5 | Posted by THEBULL at 2024-10-25 09:46 PM

"They didn't in 2020"

Sorry, dumfuq, but it's been four years, and we're still waiting for the first case of meaningful evidence. Exactly how much longer are you planning to wait before submitting proof in a court of law?

Because if it's been four years, and still, without THE FIRST PIECE OF EVIDENCE, you're pretending something exists which doesn't ...

... you're in a cult.

#6 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-10-25 09:53 PM

@#5 ... They didn't in 2020 ...

If your comment is referring to the Republicans, I'd agree.

Fmr Pres Trump did not win in 2020.

Now, let's go on to discuss the dementia patient the the GOP seems to be proffering for the Oval Office/

Do you agree that fmr Pres Trump should drop out of the race?

#7 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-10-25 09:54 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Musk Suddenly Realizes He Has No Clue How to Govern (30 comments)

Trump's Coming House Headaches (23 comments)

Lousiana Bars Health Dept. from Promoting Vaccines (14 comments)

Abbott Buys Billboards Threatening Migrants (13 comments)

Musk Raises Alarms by Endorsing What's Known as 'German neo-Nazi party' (13 comments)

German Christmas Market Attack (12 comments)

Clearance Thomas Received More Lavish Gifts from Harlan Crow (11 comments)

Matt Gaetz Report to Be Released on Monday (10 comments)

U.S. Sees Rise in Life Expectancy (9 comments)

Newspaper: Absent Sitting Congress Woman Found in Dementia Care Facility (8 comments)