Tuesday, March 04, 2025

SCOTUS Weakens Rules on Dumping Raw Sewage Into Water Supplies

The US supreme court has weakened rules on the discharge of raw sewage into water supplies in a 5-4 ruling that undermines the 1972 Clean Water Act.

More

Sam Alito gave cities more leeway to dump raw sewage into our water supply by deploying a sleight of hand so clumsy that it would fail to impress a kindergarten class. This isn't statutory interpretation. It's a gut renovation of the Clean Water Act on behalf of polluters. slate.com/news-and-pol ...

[image or embed]

-- Mark Joseph Stern (@mjsdc.bsky.social) March 4, 2025 at 2:24 PM

Comments

Are we great yet, Republicans? Or do we need to bring back leaded gas to go a long with our sh!+ filled water?

#1 | Posted by qcp at 2025-03-04 03:40 PM

It's a metaphor for what America is doing to the rest of the free world. Dumping our raw sewage(Trump) on the rest of the free world.

#2 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-03-04 04:48 PM

A win for the Red State polluters in the Republican strong hold of... San Francisco?

#3 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-03-04 05:52 PM

A win for the Red State polluters

#3 | POSTED BY VISITOR

A win for MAGA wherever found.

Enjoy drinking sh--.

#4 | Posted by Zed at 2025-03-04 05:59 PM

I don't live in Cali, so not my problem.

#5 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-03-04 06:02 PM

"Let them drink sewer water!" = Marie Antionette Roberts

#6 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-04 06:08 PM

Is that the mayor of San Francisco?

#7 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-03-04 06:14 PM

If you are looking to challenge any EPA rulings now is the time.

#8 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-03-04 06:19 PM

Is that the mayor of San Francisco?

#7 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

Are you a turd that fell out of Trumpy's arse?

#9 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-03-04 06:20 PM

@#5 ... so not my problem. ...

Making your fellow Americans drink waste water is not a problem for you?

Why?

Don't you care about your fellow Americans?


#10 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-03-04 07:27 PM

Don't you care about your fellow Americans?

#10 | Posted by LampLighter

You know the answer to that...

#11 | Posted by billy_boy at 2025-03-04 07:40 PM

No comments on the fact that this is Cali and San Francisco?

#12 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-03-05 02:09 AM

""The city is wrong," according to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who wrote the dissenting opinion, which was joined by the three Democratic justices, Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson. "The relevant provision of the Clean Water Act directs EPA to impose any more stringent limitation that is necessary to meet ... or required to implement any applicable water quality standard."

I questiion the scientific basis that the right wing ideologues based their decision on and that last sentence of the dissenting opinion or the actual meaning of the law which makes it clear that the Act definitely that the EPA is directed by the Act "to impose any more stringent limitation that is necessary to meet ... or required to implement any applicable water quality standard."

As these crazy right wing Justices seem prone to, they ignore any parts of laws that they want without a real legal basis. But it's not the first time that their own own political ideology won out over laws passed by Congress which have been in place for decades,

#13 | Posted by danni at 2025-03-05 06:20 AM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Social Security Payments 'Face Disruption' (110 comments)

Trade War (64 comments)

Trump's Joint Session of Congress Address (59 comments)

Norway Firm Stops Fuel Supply to US over Trump Vs Zelensky (55 comments)

Senate Democrat says White House is 'arm of Kremlin' (36 comments)

Trump Planning to Lift Russia Sanctions (28 comments)

Zelensky Calls Trump Clash 'regrettable' (27 comments)

Musk Calls Social Security a 'Ponzi Scheme' (26 comments)

GSA to Sell over 400 Federal Properties (23 comments)

WSJ Tariff War Risks Sinking World Into New Great Depression (21 comments)