A federal judge further blocked the Trump administration from sharply cutting jobs and reorganizing the structure of many major federal agencies as part of its so-called DOGE effort under billionaire Elon Musk. ... "Agencies may not conduct large-scale reorganizations and reductions in force in blatant disregard of Congress's mandates, and a President may not initiate large-scale executive branch reorganization without partnering with Congress."
www.scotusblog.com
supreme-court-allows-trump-to-remove-agency-heads-without-cause-for-now/
the dispute implicates an important constitutional question: the president's ability to supervise the agency heads who exercise power on his behalf.
"Finish your appeals then come back and we'll do it for real"
I would expect similar results for this latest district level liberal activist judge's ruling.
#5 No, this dispute implicates the power of Congress to create agencies and departments independent of the political whims of the Executive.
Since the '30's the answer has been the Executive has limited power, firing only "for cause." www.oyez.org Not until the Buffoon's band of "unitary executive" freaks has a President asserted otherwise. Though the conservative wing of the SC has been musing about it for a while.
Drudge Retort Headlines
'You've Got No Rights' (148 comments)
Supreme Court Owes Country Explanations (54 comments)
Inflation Outpacing Wage Growth for over 40% of Americans (49 comments)
US 'strongly Rejects' French Plan to Recognize Palestine (48 comments)
Amish Kids Almost Never Get Allergies (31 comments)
US and EU Reach Trade Deal to Avoid Tariffs (27 comments)
Everyone Had Same Reaction To Video Of President Trump 'Cheating' (22 comments)
Some Republicans Aren't Backing Down from Epstein Transparency Push (22 comments)
GOP Sen. Refuses to Admit Bush, Not Obama, Was President During Epstein's Plea Deal (18 comments)
Mass Stabbing at Michigan Walmart (17 comments)