"pass Citizens United"

really?

LOL....I'm familiar with CU.

But it was a supreme court decision.....it was a decision.

It wasn't passed. It's not legislation.

-Mr. Semantics.

"passed" only refers to legislation. court cases are "decided".

Senior moment? or did you really not know that?

For as much as you reference CU, you'd think you could make the distinction.

It's like when someone says we scored 7 points in a baseball game.

It's "runs"....not points.

semantics? that's what the person saying "points" would deflect with.

-Let us know if you ever have a serious argument to the point being made.

agreed. Pointing out you don't know the difference between a court case and a specific piece of legislation isn't serious.

funny.....but not serious.

Now, to the article.....it's a fact that wealth is trickling upward at a very alarming pace and it's been doing that for way too long.

And it's happening in the US far more than anywhere else. So....does that shine the light on CU more? Tax policy? Yes on both, for sure.

Is there another solution besides this issue being a campaign issue that one side wins? Meaning.....the democrats need to run on this and start winning more. But.....do their own voters get this?

You do.....and I do. But I'm skeptical that very many people get the realistic impact of this upward trickle. Actually, I hate saying "trickle" as to suggest it's happening slowly.

More like "flow" or "strong flow"......