Monday, March 30, 2026

Walmart customers fume over 'weight' scandal, saying 'this is not fair'

Apparently, a video creator has been visiting Walmart stores and testing the accuracy of pre-weighed items like meat and produce.

Comments

Since 2024, Walmart has already settled 3 lawsuits for weight being mislabeled. Seems it must be more profitable to just pay the fine than be honest.

#1 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-30 10:05 PM

www.youtube.com

#2 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-30 11:44 PM

www.youtube.com

#3 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-30 11:45 PM

www.youtube.com

#4 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-30 11:48 PM

www.youtube.com

#5 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-30 11:51 PM

Lack of activity will make this thread be deleted. But it deserves to be up for awhile and read. I only heard about this recently and it seems this was getting posted in January but I never saw it anywhere until I stumbled on it.

If this is real....we're looking at serious fraud.

#6 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-30 11:59 PM

this was getting posted in January

CBC did a thing back then. Some stores were including the packaging in the final sale weight.

#7 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-03-31 12:08 AM

Redial,

Canada?

What is it taking so long to hit the news cycle in the US?

This is very serious.

#8 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-31 12:19 AM

What is it taking so long to hit the news cycle in the US?

No idea. Might be a different issue. Or a tik tok thing with no evidence.

#9 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-03-31 12:28 AM

Redial,

Chicken is one thing but the plastic around a ham doesn't weigh 2 lbs.

The weight of the packaging doesn't even work there with hams.

It looks plain and simple.

This has to be something employees knew about who worked in meat. It seems to be widespread.

To keep their jobs, they wouldn't blow the whistle.

I'm just amazed how much it was. Literally doubling the weight. It would still be outrageous if their defense was the weight of the package.

Is there collusion going on as well as fraud?

#10 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-31 12:30 AM

Redial,

Yes..tik tok.

Unless these videos are AI, the videos are evidence.

#11 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-31 12:31 AM

It would still be outrageous if their defense was the weight of the package.

Seems to me that's what they found here. Worst case I think it was 5% or something like that for the packaging.

#12 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-03-31 12:34 AM

Redial,

It's hard to believe selling the packaging by weight to the customer is legal.

Not to mention, I don't buy the 5% you mentioned.

You need to watch some of the videos. One I saw a 3 pound difference in a packaged ham. There's no bloody pad and the plastic wrap certainly didn't weigh more than the ham.

You almost sound like you accept that explanation as acceptable instead of condemning it?

Everyone should be up in arms about this. It should be front page news. Why isn't it?

Why is Walmart doing this still after being fined already? It's almost like they just consider the fines as cost of doing business.

This certainly isn't a partisan news story. Who in their right mind would defend Walmart doing this?

#13 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-31 05:36 AM

Redial,

Actually...we're looking at it all wrong.

Packaged meat left in the wrapper is still showing considerably less weight put on scales than the label that's on the package.

That makes it even worse if you subtract the weight of the packaging and bloody pad and just look at how much actual meat you're getting.

Any other year this would be a big news story.

#14 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-31 05:47 AM

Redial,

Personally, I think someone is asleep at the switch and not doing their job.

Which regulatory agencies are responsible for catching this, and why isn't it being addressed?

Why does it keep happening until customers are the ones exposing it?

#15 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-31 05:52 AM

Not sure why you are surprised a greedy corporation would take advantage of their customers and employees.

I remember in the early 90s that people who put in 40 hours per week working at Walmart qualified for food stamps.

Does it make you angry that the American taxpayer has been subsidizing Walmart's profits for years? May I suggest you familiarize yourself with the peopleofWalmart website for comic relief.

#16 | Posted by Chantresse at 2026-03-31 08:16 AM

Chant,

I'm well aware of the controversy surrounding Walmart. It goes back for years.

They could create big purchasing contracts getting better pricing than smaller stores.

This put small stores out of business.

You sound naive crying about the big bad greedy store. All this is nothing new and part of capitalism.

But marking products wrong is not part of capitalism.

#17 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-31 08:59 AM

It would still be outrageous if their defense was the weight of the package.

I saw the videos, they were still packaged.

But marking products wrong is not part of capitalism.

WalMart disagrees.

#18 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-03-31 09:33 AM

Naive? Pot meet kettle. In your own post you are complaining about marketing products wrong, yet you are surprised that a company that routinely hurt smaller competitors would do another thing to take advantage of someone else?

#19 | Posted by Chantresse at 2026-03-31 09:58 AM

Chant,

Creating purchase contracts taking advantage of buying in bulk utilizing buying power is legal.

Marking a package as 4 pounds that only weighs 2 pounds is illegal.

It doesn't matter what Walmart thinks.

#20 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-31 10:41 AM

It's hard to believe selling the packaging by weight to the customer is legal.

It's not. Unless it's labelled as such.

You almost sound like you accept that explanation as acceptable instead of condemning it?

I actually just don't care. I don't shop by weight. I just look at what's in the package, and the price tag, and decide if I want to buy it or not.

Which regulatory agencies are responsible for catching this, and why isn't it being addressed?

LOL. It's a good bet DOGE got rid of them all. Mustn't be hampering business with excessive regulation.

#21 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-03-31 12:16 PM

If this is real....we're looking at serious fraud.

#6 | Posted by BillJohnson

Are you kidding? Other stores will do this because they'll see zero consequences for Wal Mart.

#22 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-31 12:51 PM

@#21 ... It's a good bet DOGE got rid of them all.

Mustn't be hampering business with excessive regulation. ...

Exactly.


#23 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-31 01:29 PM

Does Walmart process its own chickens? Wondering if this might be the source processor mislabelling, over-charging WalMart, of course.

Which regulatory agencies are responsible for catching this, and why isn't it being addressed?

Local county or state Weights and Measures departments. You'll see the logos at GasStations. Which I suspect is also ripping off the consumer.

#24 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-03-31 02:25 PM

Mustn't be hampering business with excessive regulation. ...

The regulations already exist. But America I have noticed doesn't want to enforce its own laws, just politicize them ... see sanctuary cities.

#25 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-03-31 02:26 PM

@#21 ... It's a good bet DOGE got rid of them all.

How much you want to bet?

#26 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-03-31 02:27 PM

AI .....

Sourcing: Tyson and Perdue are the primary processors behind Walmart's "Great Value" chicken products.
Production Shift: Walmart does not operate the slaughterhouses or poultry processing plants itself; rather, it buys and distributes these products.
Recent Developments: Walmart is moving toward controlling more of its supply chain to reduce reliance on middlemen and enhance quality.
Beef Exception: As of 2025, Walmart owns and operates a "case-ready" beef facility in Olathe, Kansas, which cuts and packages beef rather than butchering, as noted in reports by and.

#27 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-03-31 02:29 PM

One,

I knew someone would figure out how to blame it on Trump.

#28 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-31 04:23 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Why Iran Thinks It's Winning (41 comments)

Israel Passes Death by Hanging Law for Palestinians (35 comments)

New Evidence Corroborates Claims of Trump-Epstein Accuser (35 comments)

Dow Tumbles 800 Points, S&P 500 Posts its Fifth Straight Weekly Loss (35 comments)

Iran Accuses US of Plotting Ground Attack (34 comments)

Beshear: How Democrats Can Win (31 comments)

Architects Skeptical of Trump's White House Ballroom Plan (23 comments)

SCOTUS Rules Against Ban on 'conversion therapy' for Kids (20 comments)

GOP Weighing Health Care Cuts to Fund Iran War (19 comments)

Iran Lawmakers Approve Plan to Impose Tolls on Strait of Hormuz (16 comments)