Black Lawmakers Feel Democrats Have Abandoned Them
As an example of the fine line Democratic leaders have to walk...
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
A_Friend
Joined 2005/09/21Visited 2026/07/13
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Black Lawmakers Feel Democrats Have Abandoned Them (6 comments) ...
Why Are Democratic Leaders So Milquetoasty? (52 comments) ...
Scriptural Evidence That Trump Is Set Apart by God (10 comments) ...
Are You Not Entertained? (57 comments) ...
The Democrats who Can Win Red America (13 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
snip ...
As an example of the fine line Democratic leaders have to walk, consider the ramifications of the Supreme Court's decision to gut the remaining bit of the Voting Rights Act. Black leaders, especially in the South, are feeling isolated. Party leaders are focused on swing House districts and states and 2028 presidential hopefuls are in early states, of which only one (South Carolina) has a large Black population. Howard Dean's 50-state strategy never got going, and instead, Democrats have something like a 30-state strategy, where the party apparatus has been left to wither and die in many red states, especially in the South.
#1 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-07-13 01:39 PM | Reply
Well, they could back the party that still thinks of them as 3/5ths of a human being.
#2 | Posted by morris at 2026-07-13 01:40 PM | Reply
Some Black leaders in the South are despairing. Florida House Minority Leader Fentrice Driskell (D) said: "Republicans in the Legislature and the Supreme Court have said that it's okay to turn back the clock and reverse civil rights progress in this country. They're basically giving these Southern states what they have consistently and persistently wanted, which is to suppress Black voices." Some people are more explicit where the problem is. Yolanda Renee King, the granddaughter of Martin Luther King Jr., said: "The Democrats sort of allowed for this behavior to regularly happen," referring to the Democrats' failure to pass the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act when they had the trifecta.
#3 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-07-13 01:40 PM | Reply
But part of the problem is internal. The 62-member Congressional Black Caucus, which is entirely Democratic, has been focused on swing seats. A leader of its PAC, Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY), said: "The PAC has always been focused on electing Democrats in tough seats so that we can reclaim the majority. That goal, that focus, has not changed." Note that he said nothing about holding Black seats or supporting Black challengers to Republicans. In most cases, it is supporting white candidates who have a good chance of holding a tough blue district or flipping a marginal red one. The CBC's priority is maximizing the number of Democrats in the House, not the number of Black Democrats.
In fact, it could also be phrased as
The priority is...maximizing the number of Democrats in the House, not just the number of Progressive Democrats
Otherwise, for example, Jim "Gomer" Comer would remain chair of the Oversight Committee in the US House if the Democrats don't take the majority this coming November. That's an outcome everyone in the middle or the left side of the aisle should abhor.
And a political party that consists of large groups of Black voters, Latinos, Asian Americans, and other racial minorities, along with LGBTQ voters, Jews, affluent college-educated suburbanites, single women and young voters needs all Democratic candidates elected - everywhere - and not just "pure" Democrats who can easily get elected in NYC or Los Angeles. Such candidates would crash and burn in places like Texas (Talarico would be too "conservative" for LA voters) and Georgia (and as with Talarico, Ossman would be too "conservative" for voters in NYC).
It still amazes me that there are those who are so politically ignorant to understand this basic equation built on the reality of the game on the ground in state after state, Congressional District after Congressional District, town after town ...
... not the political game played on the Internet by Karl Rove/James Carville wannabes.
#4 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-07-13 02:03 PM | Reply
Deep down the Democratic Party is a Uniparty with the Republicans.
They want Social Control in the same way.
That's why Democratic Socialists are so hated by Both party Establishments.
Capitalism is Both of their Creeds.
It's only tinkering with the Details really.
Both parties help and enrich themselves with Finance Capital and Both Parties Love Corporations.
We need another Viable Party or Two.
#5 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-07-13 02:05 PM | Reply
I thought "A_fiend" got his funding pulled.
#6 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-07-13 06:24 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy