Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, April 28, 2026

An additional day of reporting has largely confirmed the outlines of my morning-after analysis on Saturday night's scary-but-contained security incident at the White House Correspondents Association dinner. Saturday's incident was closer on the spectrum to the Clinton era "assassination attempt" when a guy opened fire on the White House with an AK-47 from the public sidewalk than it was to Butler, where the president was actually in danger. It was just a Hail Mary at the first line of security.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the OpEd ...

... There were four pieces I wanted to highlight, both good and bad:

There was, for instance, a breathless Washington Post piece that seemed to imply some level of scandal or "laxness" in the security based on how the dinner wasn't designated a "National Security Special Event," but then (a) failed to mention whether that was a change from any prior WHCA dinner and (b) in its own subsequent reporting explained how the dinner failed to meet the standard for an NSSE, thereby undercutting the whole premise of the "scandal."

At the other end of the thoughtful-and-informed spectrum, one piece worth reading that brings some important nuance was this MS NOW one by Carol Leonnig, just about the only journalist who has written meaningfully about the long-term challenges of the Secret Service. She points out how the Secret Service has narrowly averted tragedy three times in two years when faced with "a low-tech lone wolf."

It's also astounding -- and worrisome -- how quickly and widespread how what one might call the "median online perspective" has coalesced around the incident being staged or a false-flag operation, citing a mix of evidence. It surely wasn't, but it's a troubling sign of how corrupted the public backdrop of trust is and how compromised our information environments are these days. As one person joked yesterday, the strongest evidence it wasn't staged was that no one tried to insider-trade on Kalshi or Polymarket.)

Lastly, I want to highlight Brian Stelter's very smart -- and heartfelt -- essay about how America's elite merely got a taste Saturday night of what it's like to now be a schoolchild in the US: "We need to say out loud that it was actually all too ordinary. In America this is all too common -- a shots-fired moment, a chaotic lockdown, a spasm of violence interrupting a peaceful gathering. Thousands of media and political elites have now gone through what countless millions of other Americans have experienced in their schools, offices, malls and churches. And on most of those occasions, there were no Secret Service agents." I did an entire podcast season about how America lost its mind and sense when it comes to guns, and it's sad that one time after another, we miss the opportunities to change our country's trajectory on gun violence. ...

[emphasis mine]


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-28 07:52 PM | Reply

More from the OpEd ...

... The White House bunker has never been intended to be a place a president would actually run a crisis from long-term. ...

In other remarks to the press aboard Air Force One, Trump called the ballroom a "shed" for the new bunker: "The military is building a massive complex under the ballroom, and that's under construction, and we're doing very well," Mr. Trump said. "We have secure telecommunications and communications all over. We have bomb shelters that we're building. We have a hospital and very major medical facilities that we're building. We have all of these things."

Understanding that it's often impossible to know as Donald Trump talks what's real, what's not, and what's mere hyperbole, the scale of what he's mentioned would represent a sharp departure from the traditional purpose of the presidential bunker. ...


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-28 08:39 PM | Reply

So what, then, is the purpose of a Presidential bunker?

And does Pres Trump's grand plan for his ballroom meet that purpose?




#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-28 08:41 PM | Reply

"The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy hiding in a bunker."
--Republicans

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-28 08:41 PM | Reply

Also, mentioned in the OpEd ...

The purpose of a bunker at the White House is not to provide an extended, let's say, visit. But more to provide to provide short-term protection until the President can be moved to some other nebulous location.

Stated differently, as the OpEd excellently (ya have to read the whole thing...) explains, why place the President in a location that is known by our enemies to be where he is?


#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-28 09:16 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort