Piss off, Alexandrite. Aren't you scheduled to bite Oneironaut's ankles at this time in the evening?

Danforth,

You have hijacked this thread with stuff unrelated. If you want to comment on topic, I'll play along. Otherwise I'm done. Wanna discuss your preferred issues? Create your own thread and I'll participate.

On a different thread:

Taking what was at worst a misdemeanor accounting clerical error with no victims, employing novel legal theory and securing 34 felony indictments in front of a hack activist judge. Hochul announced to a skittish business community the case was a one-off. Andrew Cuomo acknowledged that nobody other than Trump in that environment would have been charged and the case will end up scathingly trounced when it reaches appeal. Letitia James campaigned on "getting Trump" and that's before she even had a case in front of her.

States suing to have Trump removed from the ballot. Judges essentially predetermining the outcome of a presidential election.

#46 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER AT 2026-10-06 03:59 PM | FLAG:

" You have ZERO Lawfare against Trump."

I cited examples and it wasn't an exhaustive list. You just sit there and say, "Nuh uh!"

Liberal arts used to be of the mantra - we don't teach you what to think, but how to think critically.

Polling and studies show that is less the case these days.

Outlaw debate? You love debate. It's the left that seeks to use th power of the state to silence its opposition. You are exactly what you accuse others of being, Zed.

It's funny that you are using the word "deflect". This thread isn't even about the topics you are bringing up and by bringing them up you are ... .deflecting.

I haven't proven lawfare or censorship? You'd NEVER accept ANY amount of proof so it's a circular discussion.

" Who bears responsibility for you telling lies? You?!?

#21 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2026-10-06 01:21 PM | FLAG: "

Everything I said is factual.

They were thwarted by two senators, now gone, from enacting the following with a razor thin House majority and a 50/50 in the Senste:

Nuking the filibuster
Packing SCOTUS
Adding Puerto Rico and DC (a fricking city) as states thus adding 4 more Dem senators.

During Biden they opened the border like it had never been before. The intent short term was to have all of those illegal aliens count in the 2030 census and strategizing a path for amnesty and new Dem voters.

Then there is all of the cultural stuff - transing minors. Treating concerned parents as enemies of the state. The destruction of Title IX. Forcing women to share locker rooms, prisons, sororities, etc with males and without their consent. DEI everything thus destroying merit based outcomes, embracing racial discrimination, ostracizing and cancelling those who dare to dissent. Downplaying and even glorifying violent riots. Supporting rampant anti-semitism. Defund the police. Cashless bail and soft sentences and lack of prosecution for violent offenders ... and plenty more. These are what leftist institutuons, including the Democratic Party did with their power.

Please point out the "lie".

Taking what was at worst a misdemeanor accounting clerical error with no victims, employing novel legal theory and securing 34 felony indictments in front of a hack activist judge. Hochul announced to a skittish business community the case was a one-off. Andrew Cuomo acknowledged that nobody other than Trump in that environment would have been charged and the case will end up scathingly trounced when it reaches appeal. Letitia James campaigned on "getting Trump" and that's before she even had a case in front of her.

States suing to have Trump removed from the ballot. Judges essentially predetermining the outcome of a presidential election.

Personal attacks are all any of you have. And Democrats, those currently in power, despise the Constitution and actively seek to fundamentally transform this country.

" When asked to put up, you shut up.

#8 | POSTED BY ZED AT 2026-10-06 12:37 PM | REPLY | FLAG:"

I'm not going to assign positions to you. Fact is, I don't see you talk policy. It's all an existential battle between good and evil in your binary world. So, you see me as evil because I don't vote Democrat. You also have articulated that Trump and by proxy those who you perceive to be his supporters, want to kill you. The only concern that has for me is if we ever met in a person are you so mentally deranged that you'd shoot me out of self perceived act of self defense.

" I'm "the Left". Why don't you tell me what I'm up to?

#4 | POSTED BY ZED AT 2026-10-06 11:59 AM | REPLY"

Are you running for office? Are you a PAC member or a DSA member? Are you donating anything more than nominal amounts of money to political causes or candidates?

If the collective answer is "no" then it doesn't really matter what policies you advocate.

Zed,

You are entirely missing the point. The point is calling the left stupid is dangerously missing the point. The left has an agenda and they are working intelligently to get it implemented.

" UofO into a right wing employment agency"

That's hilarious. These universities are overwhelmingly left wing employment agencies, borderline monopolistically so and you are pissing vinegar that anyone on the right has ANY input into how these universities are run?

" P#ss, moan, whine, rinse, and repeat.

#16 | POSTED BY DOC_SARVIS AT 2026-10-06 06:59 AM | FLAG: "

Who are you directing that at? Cuz, people right of center are LOVING that Griffin fled Illinois for Florida and took all of that tax revenue with him and his employees and donating that sum to a Florida University over Northwestern is the cherry on top.

You all spent years targeting Trump and his circle. It set a horrible precedent and I warned you that it could come back to bite your party. Trump is a spiteful and vindictive POS. Framing that precedent and running with it was inevitable. Hopefully whoever wins in 2028 will see th longer term damage this crap is doing and will work to put the genie back in the bottle.

" Is charged with felony obstruction of a reproductive care facility"

Frivolously. But the process is the punishment and you know that. Also, a pre dawn guns drawn raid of a man with a clean record? It was targeted lawfare so naturally you leap to defend it.

" No ... About the only thing the government did was remind them of their own policies. The editors still decided to do what editors do, and EDIT."

What a riot! You're nothing if not funny.

"Yo u don't get to call it censorship unless the editors don't want to do something, and the government forces them to do it."

"Thats an awfully nice social media platform you have there. It would be a shame if something happened to it.' There is no way you are this naive.

"You know, kind of like what Trump has done to a number of media companies"

Example?

" Your "Twitter Files" turned out to be Editors doing Editor things"

At the prodding and behest of the federal government. You would NEVER accept Musk doing that now at the behest of the Trump administration, nor should you. Bit back then it was (D)ifferent, wasn't it?

" Ever hear of Mark Houck?"

No."

Here is a link:

" Ever hear of Mark Houck?"

No."

Here is a link:

" Am I doing this right?"

Yep. If he donated that money to Northwestern he'd be praised to the nth. But because he left Illinois for Florida the donation has to be derided.

Danforth,

I've done so on countless occasions and it's more than just Trump. Ever hear of Mark Houck?

Also, I've provided all sorts of links in the past and you just reply, "Nuh uh!"

#71. When I read their respective posts it's blatantly obvious.