I demand the return of 99 cent Whoppers. And super sized fries, cooked in beef fat.

Make fast food great again!

She's lucky she's purty. Her future OnlyFans account will do well.

Although she's correct as Trump has zero cognitive dissonance. Dude doesn't believe in anything beyond himself, so nothing he says or does causes him the slightest bit of discomfort.

Shanahan separately made news on Thursday when it was revealed that she had poured another $8 million into Kennedy's campaign coffers, adding to the $2 million she previously gave in March, and other funds she has routed to his Super PAC.

People are going to say "Bobby only picked me for my money," she quipped at a fundraiser in Tennessee. Kennedy has denied that he would "choose a vice presidential candidate based on how much money that they have." Still, his selection of Shanahan has allowed her to give unlimited funds directly to the campaign"power she would not have were she not on the ticket.

Yeah, but how about hot dogs??
#2 | Posted by LegallyYourDead

The man only identified as Omar B. had vanished at the age of 19 during the Algerian Civil War in 1998, and his family assumed he had been kidnapped or killed.

Now aged 45, he was found amid haystacks only about 200 yards away in the city of Djelfa after the captor's brother aired grievances on social media, reportedly due to an inheritance dispute.

Algerian media reported that when family members began searching the suspect's house, he became tense when they approached a haystack, and they eventually found Omar B. "sitting quietly" underneath.

Why do 20-25% of Republicants vote for someone who dropped out months ago, Wafflehead?
#5 | Posted by LegallyYourDead

Because they can't read, OK!?!

Also, some New Yorker held up a potato. No word on whether the Irish hurt themselves by charging full speed into screen to grab it.

The article leaves out the specifics of the inappropriate behavior. Mooning? Exposing --------? Probably both and more ... #4 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

You do realize that no one is forcing Israel to drop bombs on civilians, right? #62 | Posted by truthhurts
And by the same token, Palestinians could stop using their own civilians as human shields. But they don't seem to want to do that for some reason. By a strange coincidence, Palestinians getting their civilians killed seems to work like a charm on riling up bleeding hearts and anti-Semites. Weird, that.

Yes, I know that the pro-Hamasers would very much like Israel to stand with its hands in its pockets while the Palestinians rape and murder Israeli civilian men, women, and children. Israel does not seem to be keen on that idea. Maybe if the Palestinians murder a few thousand more Jewish civilians in cold blood they can see if that brings the Israelis around.

Nonsense, fanboi. Just say the "kids" deserved it and be done with it. #66 | Posted by jpw
Civilians die in war. That's the way wars work. Sorry that fact troubles you.

It's the hiding behind technical definitions to brush off the deaths of "kids" (as you phrased it) because in the end you don't care if Palestinian children are cared [killed(?)], you're just too chicken ---- to say it out loud. #51 | Posted by jpw

People die in war. Not really clear on why you're getting on my case about it, or blaming me for that reality. It's a war the Palestinians instigated by raping and murdering 1,200 civilian men, women, and children. Because they, in their infinite wisdom, wanted war.

Even now the Palestinians won't agree to cease hostilities and accept Israel's right to exist. If the Palestinians don't care about the lives of their own children, what do you expect of me?

I have a good feeling about this.

I would make a Boeing joke but I'm afraid it will fall apart.

If this were true [...] this would put MORE of a moral obligation on Israel to save these exploited children. Especially considering they are de facto Nader the protection/jurisdiction of Israel since Palestine isn't a country
#45 | Posted by truthhurts

Why? So you can cry "genocide" as Israel loads them into "protection vans"? You pro-Hamas guys just trot out anything, no matter how inconsistent it is with anything you said before.

And no, Israel is not responsible for stopping the Palestinians from killing off their own kids. That's an 80+ year tradition for certain people and Israel should respect their culture.

You're seriously f^%#ed in the head. Seek help, dude. #42 | Posted by jpw

Why, because I understand that civilian deaths are part and parcel of war?:

[...]I mean, is there a line somewhere between 7K and 14K dead kids where suddenly everyone is like "whoa whoa whoa whoa there, let's think about this, shall we?" #39 | Posted by jpw

That first requires believing any of the numbers originating from Hamas's agencies. And that also depends upon how many of those "kids" are Hamas's child soldiers, unless you think that Hamas is abiding by child labor laws or something and would never "hire" a "kid" under 18 years of age for combat.

#4 | Posted by Claudio

Show us on this Trump Diaper Baby where Sleepy Joe touched you.

"The IDF was complacent." Complicit is a better word. Israel gave hamas monthly cash payments. Israel also gave their intel weekends off. So complicit and complacent. #15 | Posted by Brennnn

Thank you for summarizing the pro-Hamas perspective.

Yes, the Jews are responsible for Hamas raping and murdering 1,200 civilian men, women and children on October 7th. The truth is that Jews made Hamas do it. Probably roofied them and slipped some Viagra into their hummus. Tricksy Jewses!

Luftwaffles is for sure IraGoldberg and probably Sheeple. The Biden shower fixation is deep.
#3 | Posted by REDIAL

Ugh, I've been interacting with SheepleScheissem?

Now I need a shower. Hope that doesn't turn into a Sheeple-post.

#31 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT

Looking forward to those numbers when the Palestinians get around to figuring out how many dead children and women they have. Should be any minute now...

Interesting point in your article: "The [Hamas] ministry does not distinguish between casualties among fighters and civilians."

That's a neat trick Hamas has, not distinguishing between their own terrorist soldiers and civilians. Especially considering that vastly more 10-17 year olds are dying than under 9. But we know that Hamas would never use child-soldiers...

NYT: Trump leads 5 of 6 swing states

We just need to vote for harder for Jill Stein 2024!

[...] And just two weeks after the leader of the OCHA decided to step down for health reasons. [...] #15 | Posted by Sycophant

[...] Neoconservatives ehhhhhh. Like they are an honest broker. #23 | Posted by LauraMohr

Yeah, it's almost like you need reporters who don't sympathize with terrorists to call out the pro-Hamas media on repeating Hamas's lies.

[...] Fun fact: The Gaza Ministry of Health gets its numbers ONLY from hospitals and the Red Crescent. Their reports only includes those casualties and put them in a spreadsheet. [...] #20 | Posted by Sycophant

Sure, if you want to believe "a different Hamas-controlled organization, the Gaza Ministry of Health," go right ahead. I won't argue with you.

AMAZING! Suddenly UN critics trust the UN! What a complete turn around. [...] #15 | Posted by Sycophant

Actually, no. The point was that the UN cannot be trusted. They cut the fatalities for children and women in half but did nothing to draw attention to that very significant development.

On top of that "The UN gave no source for the lower figures in its May 8 update, but the figures precisely match those in a May 2 report from a different Hamas-controlled organization, the Gaza Ministry of Health."

So now the UN is actively hiding the fact that it is publishing Hamas's lies (whereas, previously they gave a Hamas agency as the source for their numbers).