>two million people on Obamacare plans don't get subsidies.
>#27 | Posted by censored
Is that really your argument? YOu actually think I care about 2 million people getting subsidies
#29 | Posted by lfthndthrds
No, I'm pretty sure you don't care about those two million. And fairly positive you don't care about the 22 million who need
subsidies to get healthcare for themselves/their families
Create the welfare state then admonish those who don't want to fund it.
#30 | Posted by lfthndthrds
Right, like I said, you favor the Repub healthcare plan of "let them die."
Trump picked a guy with very little experience in anything but finance, Vance.
Harris had been an AG and then Senator for twice as long as Vance had been a Senator, so more experience there too.
#7 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY
I'm not saying she wasn't qualified. But telling 75-80% of the voting public that they wouldn't have been considered for the position based on the color of their skin or what they have dangling between their legs isn't the best method of winning people over. Affirmative action isn't a huge plus when running for office.
Trump, on the other hand, could pick a warm jar of phlegm for his running mate and he wouldn't have lost a single vote. And the MAGATs would turn up in four years to cast their ballot for that jar of phlegm for president if it has Trump's endorsement, so long as the phlegm is white and male.