Not a onenut thread?
#1 | Posted by LegallyYourDead

Could be. Is he the guy in the bottom right of the tweet?

Garcia hadn't slept in days when he began nodding off on his bicycle in UN Plaza, his feet slipping from the pedals as he slumped over the handlebars in a fentanyl-induced haze.

He admits he was in rough shape, but insists he was still conscious when a man shoved Narcan into his nose, shocking his body into violent withdrawal before ordering him not to sleep there.

"He knew I was still awake " he had bad intentions for sure," Garcia told the Standard.

The jolt left Garcia flailing, puking and drenched in sweat as his body went into sudden opioid withdrawal.

Indian beheaded by illegal immigrant in Dallas

If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you;
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
And-which is more-you'll be a Man, my son!

Trump Ties Russian Sanctions to NATO China Sanctions

Any excuse to avoid holding Russia to account is a good excuse as far as Putin's Beach is concerned.

Rand Paul: Venezuela Boat Attack Was a Drone Strike
The senator told The Intercept the attack defied rules of engagement

What's that? The guy who twice voted against holding Trump accountable for his criminal conduct is suddenly concerned about "rules?"

Confidence in Finding a New Job Falls to Record Low

I hear there's an opening at Turning Point USA.

Oh and I've noticed not a single thing said about the victim on this thread.
#41 | Posted by BellRinger

I mean, I thought she was hot. Just figured it would be in bad taste to mention on an article about her brutal murder.

OK, since you opened this can of worms, your turn. Tell us what you would rate her on a scale of 1 to 10. Also, feel free to throw in any details of what you would do to her in bed.

We can talk about Nicole Simpson next.

Just another opportunity for the Roberts Court to grant dictatorial and unconstitutional powers to a traitor/dictator.
#1 | Posted by danni

"Well don't blame me. I voted for Jill Stein."
- Useful Idiots

A story you wont see on the DR unless I post it
Posted by boaz

MAGAts:

Apple event expected to feature a slimmer iPhone

Is it thin enough to double as a shank in prison?

No? Then no sale!

Every Liberal, myself included [...]
#7 | Posted by oneironaut

Hey look, everyone! OneIronTurd is pretending to be a Bernie Bro again. One who just happens to agree with everything the GOP says and does.

Consistency is definitely not the hobgoblin of OneIronTurd's Paid Russian Troll Wumao Army mind.

If this had been a black or brown woman, and the perp was white, it would be in dancing banana's. But the perp ticks all the right boxes. Black, mentally ill, and his target was white. Cant let this get out. Makes the Dem narrative look bad.
#1 | Posted by boaz

President Donald Trump reacted to news of a deadly stabbing on a Charlotte light rail last month, calling the situation "horrible." "Horrible," Trump said Sunday after hearing about the case for the first time. "I haven't heard ... [but] I'll know all about it by tomorrow morning."

He hates Black people because he's a racist POS. But he detests Ukrainians because he's Putin's Beach.

He doubled down on those claims on Tuesday while tacking on the transparently ridiculous assertion that the U.S. is "taking in $17 trillion ... because of tariffs."
#1 | Posted by Corky

"You know, I think that there is a line in the sand with people raping children,"

"Nuh-Uh!"
-MAGAts/GOP

Trump DOJ Considering Gun Restrictions for Transgenders

This is my rifle, this is my gun!

Hmmm why would the Palestinians have a problem with US who is supplying the bombs being dropped on them?
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
#27 | Posted by truthhurts

I've never suggested that Palestinians are without basis to be terrorist POS. I just don't cotton to it.

But the point is that we would never put our people in harms way again for those people. If you are so young you missed it, look up how the US peacekeeping in Lebanon played out. (Hint, terrorist muslims murdered us in thanks)

"Polio is for winners!"

-Flori-duh Man

Are you channeling Kamala? :-)
#84 | Posted by BellRinger

Maybe. If she asked politely ...

No wonder democrats are such [kitties] about this.
#81 | Posted by eberly

There is zero doubt how this will turn out in every state controlled by the GOP. As noted in #56

The question, I have would be why does the US need voter rolls? Why do you need to register?
If you had a VOTERID of some sort (national card or citizen card or whatever) why would you need to have this whole system, which can be undermined?
#73 | Posted by oneironaut

That's a feature, not a bug.

The fact that the GOP wants to require a card to exercise a constitutional right before that card is provided to all voters accomplishes their only goal, which is to make sure that they suppress votes from those who are more likely to go against them.

The GOP has been talking about requiring voter ID for decades. But not once have they taken steps to automatically issue IDs to all citizens entitled to vote.

Also, proper verification PROTECTS voter rights by maintaining integrity in the process.
#58 | Posted by BellRinger

Yes, making it more difficult for hundreds of millions of people to vote for a hypothetical risk (numbering in the thousands over the course of decades) is protecting voter rights.

We wouldn't even put American soldiers on the ground for a few days to distribute aid because they would have been targets for the Palestinians. You think we're gonna put tens of thousands of construction workers out there for ten years to suck up Palestinian terrorist rockets?

Man, throw out an anti-Jew dog whistle and you gullible rubes fall for it, hook, line, and sinker.

#41. Dude, photo ID is required to purchase alcohol, tobacco, air travel, etc.
#42 | Posted by BellRinger

Which one of those is a constitutional right fundamental to the functioning of our democracy? One that can be easily subverted by putting up hurdles after the GOP/Trump SCOTUS rubberstamps the requirement?

It is funny watching lefties decry this after they made a serious attempt at federalizing elections in 2021.
#39 | Posted by BellRinger

There's a difference between making sure people can exercise their Constitutional right to vote, and setting up a system to deprive people of that right. If you don't understand that already, certainly no one here will be able to convince you otherwise.

>Let our overseers decide who rules
>#28 | Posted by censored

Oi Veh, you think they don't already do that?
#34 | Posted by easy_meat

And it's thinking like that which got us into the present situation.

Abdication of personal responsibility, letting the perfect be the enemy of the good (or the least worst option). Throwing away votes on third parties or sitting on our butts on election day. And now many of us will find ourselves without that terrible burden of voting or having any control over our own government.

Jill Stein 2028!