"An injured knee. He ended up on the hood of the car."

But if he dies tomorrow, that doesn't count, right?

We're still living by "J6 Rules"...right?!?

"Bottom line..."

...is you would have a 180 degree different reaction if the letters after the name were different, and we all know it.

That's the textbook definition of a partisan hack: your morals change with the parties.

"She didn't have any actionable information to investigate."

That's like saying no Covid testing means no Covid.

Your logic is so circular you should serve mustard with the pretzels.

"How does that happen?"

Maybe an investigation would've answered that question.

Meanwhile, if the letters were reversed, the lack of FBI investigation would be unacceptable to you.

And you'd be right.

"She didn't know the year."

I couldn't remember the year of my heart attack.

You're pretending that's a barometer of IT NOT HAPPENING.

"The allegations were complete BS"

You have no proof of that claim. ZERO.

Meanwhile, my claim is clearly true: the FBI NEVER INTERROGATED the named witness. Not a single time.

Only partisan hacks believe that's acceptable. And you're too much of a coward to admit, if the letters were reversed, you'd be having a conniption fit.

"It's ok with me because it was a bogus allegation."

You can't prove that. All that can be proved is the FBI didn't interrogate the sole named witness, either under oath, or otherwise.

It's only a bogus allegation because of your (R)easons. If there was a (D) after the name, you'd be screeching about FBI corruption.

And you'd be right.

"This is how an interview would have gone"

If it was that innocent, it would've happened. And the FBI CHOSE NOT to follow-up on other allegations. The same folks advocating for Kavanaugh's confirmation were the ones "running" the investigation.

In related news, Comey and McCabe both got audited, a statistical near-impossibility, especially in an era with so few audits.

"It's ok with me"

The only honest phrase you've posted.

" She named 4 people, none of whom had any recollection of the incident."

How many of those people did the FBI question under oath? Oh that's right, zero.

You still haven't answered my question: why is that OK with you?

" Track down 4500 bogus "leads"."

No, just the credible ones. Of course they couldn't even start with the first lead.

"How stupid do you think the FBI is?"

Not stupid, corrupt. And definitely corrupt if they won't even question the named witness.

You still haven't directly addressed my direct questions. I won't respond to anything else from you until you do.

Stop deflecting. Start with explain explaining why you think it's OK the FBI didn't interview the named witness.

"You won't because you can't. "

Fat talk from someone who won't directly answer my direct questions because he can't.

"Cite a single allegation you stand behind. Just one."

Not before you directly answer my direct questions above. No hoop-jumping until you give DIRECT ANSWERS.

From The Guardian link above:

"The admissions in your letter corroborate and explain numerous credible accounts by individuals and firms that they had contacted the FBI with information highly relevant to ... allegations' of sexual misconduct by Justice Kavanaugh, only to be ignored. "If the FBI was not authorized to or did not follow up on any of the tips that it received from the tip line, it is difficult to understand the point of having a tip line at all," the Democratic lawmakers said...

"The allegations were baseless and you know it."

Actually, I don't know it. Neither do you. A full investigation never happened.

"None of them held up under even a modicum of scrutiny"

Sorry, pal. Not interviewing THE NAMED WITNESS doesn't even come close to the "modicum" level. You don't get that lie of a claim.

"Quite frankly, it's disgusting that you continue to lie about it."

Please explain why you believe skipping over the named witness is acceptable to you.

And do you believe it's okay in all cases, or just ones with an (R) attached?

"The left's attempt to destroy this guy was beyond disgusting"

The folks who wanted him confirmed were the same folks leading/limiting the investigation. You wouldn't accept that from anyone but Republicans.

You were told what they wanted you to hear. Lucky for them, you're a slurper.

"you be you."

What a riot.

If the letter after the name was different, you''d be screeching about the FBI not interviewing THE NAMED WITNESS.

And you'd be right.

"MAGA, right?"

Make America Grovel, Amirite?

" The GOP always seems to whine about the deficit."

Except when they're creating it, of course!

And when they're asked if they know extending otherwise expiring tax cuts is based on all new borrowing!

"Noticing that Keggenaugh, Clearance and Alito backed their daddy on the issue."

Gee...it almost seems like they're being either bribed or extorted.

"FREE revenge revolution and purge with each new 'election'!"

You can't name a single one of Trump's 91 indictments which you or I could do without fear of legal repercussions.

And since you can't, you're carrying water for an adjudicated rapist and felon.

Republican Family Values!!!

" this is the proper outcome IMO. "

And how many anti-tariff threads have you posted?

More, or less than the ones railing against Hunter Biden?

I'm taking the under.

"Like Swetnick?"

No, like all the others.

What "news" organizations told you Swetnick was the only other one???

"I see Kavanaugh is getting a lot of (well-deserved) heat for his argument that it would be too messy and complicated to unwind"

What a coincidence; that's the same reason the Trump DOJ didn't investigate the multiple claims against Keggster.

"No I didn't you ------- fruit loop."

What a riot.

Reread your post as often as it takes to understand the meaning and "logic" behind it. Your conclusion was if you can frighten her into silence, rape away!

"Trade deficits have been a problem for decades."

Tariffs don't answer that problem.