No, the job you're doing. It's got to be a really tough job.

Here's a hint to help you through it........maybe focus a little less on Bellringer....and my sphincter

It's no skin off my sphincter either way.....just trying to help.

But I'm sure you're ignore me. You think you're 100 IQ points smarter than me.

Okay....so I assumed Twoothy and Speaky would make this their full time job but apparently the job's been filled already.

I can buy the excuses and explanations for Platner's sorted past.

But does the Democratic Party have the stomach to stick with this guy?

And will Democrats show up in a general election for him?

I know Harris won Maine last time but this is different. Mainly, it's not a presidential election.

If for no other reason than entertainment, I'd like to see this come to fruition. I'm enjoying watching cheerleaders like Twoothy and Speakstupid defend this guy....and that will be a full time job for them moving forward.

I don't think he's a Nazi and I'm not worried he's going to push anything remotely Naziesque while in office.

But the Democratic Party ran away from Al Franken.....for what again?

-Texans keep blaming Democrats for their shhthole state.

I think they mostly blame Democrats for their shhhthole country.

Honestly, I don't know what MB means by "Trump is, economically, the most left-wing president evah."

70

Okay. Nice speech. so? Not sure what it has to do with my 67.

Oh....you don't want to proffer an answer, is that it?

-My reply was to a Comment by MB about A PRESIDENT's economic policy.

so? I don't even know if you agree with him or not. Do you know if you agree with him or not?

"The U.S. economy appears to have the strongest performance under the combination of a Democratic President with a Republican controlled Senate and House, and the weakest economic performance is generally under a Republican President with a Senate and House controlled by Democrats."

Wrong or right, corky?

- Eb has 'THE OBJECTIVE PROOF!"

It's an attempt to reach it. The point was that it's only for people who are interested in it.

That excludes you, clearly. Objectivity would interrupt your happy time and your spit wad making sessions.

Please....don't let me interrupt you. What I posted doesn't contradict what you posted. It merely expands and gives greater and broader context.

But I guess it doesn't tell you exactly what you want to hear so you can't accept it.

Not that anybody cares about the objective truth.......

-Heck, I can't tell you what exact year I had my heart attack

If Trump fingered you without your permission while you were in the hospital, I would imagine you'd research that date.

With that said, I'm not attacking this woman for not remembering a date

-Billionaires are the problem

And they were very involved in politics since way before CU.

3 Kennedys and 3 Bushes have run for president in the last 70 years.

And going back 200 years.....the wealthy class in this country would get together with their cigars and fine whiskey and pick our candidates.

Again, CU made it worse....but let's not pretend what was going on prior to CU.

And for the love of mike....let's not pretend that list Hartmann wrote is even remotely true. We would like for it to be true.......but it's crap.

Hartmann is arguing all of that would have happened in the last 16 years?

I agree in that we would be better off without citizens united.

But I don't agree any of those things would have happened if CU hadn't been enacted.

None of those things were in place prior to CU.

-'Tis almost like Democrats are embarrassed to bang the drum (constantly) for those successes.

Perhaps that's because those successes are not why a lot of democrats are democrats.

-no rational American would vote for them

Well, this country is chock full of Americans....not necessarily rational Americans.

And those votes are available. Those folks don't trust democrats at all. Yeah, it's quite irrational.

56

Didn't know that. Cool

And when I was talking about ignoring reality...I wasn't talking about public officials. I was talking about the dopes who vote for them.

great movie.

-People will ignore reality in order to support Donald Trump.

This is true. People will ignore reality in order to anything they want to do.

Partisan politics trump everything else.

I read a statement issued by someone at CBS defending Pelley's firing.

The comments afterward were quite predictable.

"He's a loser"
"deserves to be fired"
"lying POS"
"60 minutes sucks"

Almost everyone says they value objectivity.

Most of them are lying. They don't want objectivity. Spoon feed them what they want. Anything else is going to get rejected.

see? Clown wasn't talking about evangelicals. He was talking about much more than that.

As far as the rest of it goes......doesn't matter to me. Throw religion and evangelicals under the bus all you want. No skin off my back

"people who were groomed as children to believe an invisible man with a long beard is floating amongst the clouds, judging everyone."

Who does that describe? I was under the impression Clown was talking about anybody who believed in God. Not just Evangelicals (who vote for Trump).

To be honest, if Clown had simply said "evangelicals" I would have ignored the comment because I agree. I read it as a more broad brush description of any person who follows an organized religion.

very politically liberal Chris Hedges, Harvard Divinity Grad and registered Presbyterian Minister.

"Sounds like a real piece of ----!!"

-Speakshack

-You'll notice it's more prevalent amongst people who were groomed as children to believe an invisible man with a long beard is floating amongst the clouds, judging everyone.

You realize there are many many many intelligent liberals who believe in God and practice some sort of organized religion.

"dissatisfied with everything Trump has done as president, but is sure he's better than Harris would have been."

and guaranteed to vote for the next republican when it's time....

answer....someone who's been brainwashed.

Actually.....that's a fair point.

31

Or he's just trying to piss people like you off.

How can anyone support Trump and legitimately question the sexual morality of anyone else?