-Cards are a great way to spend some time with friends.

agreed. so is golf and beer....and if it rains? cards...

-There is no statute of limitations for murder. The only reason he is not being charged is because of who is currently running the executive branch.
The person running the executive branch will change at some point.

I agree that was murder (homicide, etc...whatever applies).

100% avoidable.

but I'm not confident anything happens to this guy even after Trump is gone.

-The lens of the Victims? WTF does that Drivel even Mean?

It means you and most others here who are going on and on about this have deluded yourselves into believing you're the victims of Trump and Epstein.

You have. And because of that, you can't even realize there are actual victims......and you're not one of them.

Because you're a -----.

-Justice means making Accusations, following up on them and CONVICTING the Miscreants.

I'm not talking about the work of prosecutors and investigators. I'm talking about pundits and blowhards like you.

-You've admitted in the past your ostrich tendencies. You don't recognize them now?

I never do.

What don't I know or understand? What am I ignoring?

I want justice for the victims of Epstein and anyone else who participated.

I'm not interested in volumes of accusations that fall short of actual justice.

I see this through the lense of the victims. If any of them were raped by Trump.....then okay. If any of them were raped by anybody.....then okay....let's get them.

I don't think the victims care how many times Trump is mentioned. Either they were raped by him or not. Either they were a victim of some participation on the part of Trump or they were not.

I can believe whatever I want with regards to what actually happened. But my belief is worth zilch. Your belief is worth zilch.

This is where we truly disagree. You think what I believe matters.....and that's because you're convinced what YOU believe matters.

I want justice for the victims. I don't care how much CNN makes covering all of this. To the media, it's a Jerry Springer episode. But it doesn't stop there. The media, and a whole host of others care not one bit for the victims and their obsession over the drama of it proves. Counting how many times Trump mentioned isn't irrelevant......but it's not justice for the victims.

And repeating that number on a blog doesn't get us any closer to justice. Obsessing over it is fine if it blows up your skirt. but it's worth zilch.

-That's the sand part.

To quote someone here who is desperate to be given a trophy each day here....."I know the conclusion is correct".

No need to take it so personal.......unless it's actually that personal to you.

-Have you noticed he's never even acknowledged the half dozen voter suppression tactics I've posted again and again?

No, but then again I don't keep track of how many participation trophies you seek out here every time you post......and are denied.

"Like more than just an acquaintance.
Seriously, do you leave a trail of sand dripping out of your ears once you're inside your house?"

LOL. Took it personal, I see. We can move on, then. I wasn't trying to hurt anyone's feelings but I guess I can't help it.

Trump and 4 million other socialites in Northeast Corridor knew about Epstein and yes, it's massively more than just an acquaintance on Trump's part. But predictably you can't take any further than a Jerry Springer episode. Enjoy the drama, I guess.

Unlike you, I actually want justice for the victims. You just want entertainment for yourself. I want Trump in jail. I want everyone in jail who participated in those crimes. It's obvious that's not even remotely what this is about to you. It's about Bill.....and me as well, I guess.

"Most of that 80% want participation in the voting process."

You don't know what anyone wants. You might be right but you don't know. What I DO know is that we have folks here who outwardly spew their hatred for folks who disagree with them politically daily here.

And that's both sides.

You can tell yourself anything you want....it's a free country.

-Not ALL voters. Just ones he believes might vote for Democrats.

And that distinguishes him from 80% of the posters here how?

BTW, that wasn't directed towards Danforth so much as everyone.

-But if that list is from a sex trafficker, and the name is listed 38,000 times, that's certainly suggests something else entirely.

like what? Because if it falls short of criminal prosecution then the number is irrelevant.

Let's all try and remember this isn't a Jerry Springer episode. It's about the victims. We all remember the victims, right?

Being mentioned thousands of times smells like smoke to me but if it doesn't result in criminal prosecution, then it's ZILCH to the victims.

We all remember the victims, right? If I didn't know better, I'd think we have.......

-Am I the only person who sees a fault in that Republican math?

yes, probably

what a bunch of whiners.

Your tears are delicious.

-Do you think they told Crooks he was going to get brained on that roof?

Did you ever give up the 9-11 conspiracy theories?

Moved on to this one?

I'm ending these conversations.

see? This how you end a conversation.

Bye....

-Nothing Bubba or Obama of any other Pres has done comes anywhere close to Trump.

Nothing? Sex with an intern in the WH, attacking all the bimbos, impeachment?

That's nothing?

I agree Trump is demonstrably worse. But Clinton's transgressions were "nothing"?

That's your lame ass defense for whataboutism?

GFY!!!!!!

LOL

-You fleshed out your thoughts in response to initial scoffing by myself and a few other posters.

I didn't see them. I only saw yours and maybe corky bit an ankle or 2 but that's about it.

I WAS acting in good faith with The JFK comparison. My unintentional clarification was just that. I'm fine with the clarification if it was needed.

The only bad faith thing I did was attaching you to the defenses of such behavior. But that was only because you knew in your heart you had walked that tight rope and didn't want to come off as being supportive of it.

So I had my fun with it.

"Don't cross the streams."

GFY!!!!

see, that's a joke because I'm really asking you what you mean by that.

-Actually, it's a dismissive attempt to end a conversation that's no longer worth having with a participant who is less than honest or genuine.

GFY is "dismissive"?

Regardless.....has it ever worked? I mean even on yourself. Because if it's not worth having, then explain your next 25 posts to the same person you consider "no longer worth having".

You're still having it. But it's not worth it?

Stop being silly. GFY is about not being allowed to win. I'm supposed to let you win and I haven't played that the way you want, huh?

Honestly.......I'm a little guilty of that myself.

were you the youngest in the group who cried unless they let you win when you were little?

I end conversations I want to end. I'll do it here shortly, I promise.

-C&Ping a quote then entirely misrepresenting what it means,

except......I didn't.

You're quite angry with where I took this.

You'll just have to deal with it. Maybe a few more profane laden posts will do the trick.

Is it therapeutic for you?

"Dubious regarding the comparison until the clarification. What's this, the fourth time I've said this now?"

I'm sorry.....my clarification was unintentional if it happened at all. I really don't know what you're talking about.

I know you're incapable of asking a question if you're unclear as to my meaning. You run right to "GFY" if you're stumped, I guess.

Nothing hostile about that at all.

Is that what you mean with "GFY"? It's your way of admitting you don't understand someone? You need something clarified and rather than ask, it's "GFY" and I'm supposed to interpret that to really mean "I'm not clear on what you're saying....could you be more specific?"

I won't forget that.

-No feelings hurt

100 out of 100 people will honestly say that "GFY" is something said by someone who had their feelings hurt.

-semblance of credibility.

I take it for granted I'm always the one in the conversation with the most credibility.

Always.....and it's because I choose my conversations. I'm not on this place all day every day shouting at others profane insults as if I'm trying to best them day after day.

IOW, I leave you folks alone 99% of the time. I read your comments to others occasionally.......but not a lot. I see how you try to keep up with folks on the economy, global politics, war, defense systems, the environment, constitutional law, etc....you know....things you're very very very well versed in. You and JPWGFY I mean.

-What more about a Convicted sexual assault finger raping, victim defaming, convicted Fraud, and Impeached President on testimony of his own DOJ that he ordered them to Rig the Election... do you need,

"Did you have to go there, Corky? I just want to live out my years in peace and let my transgressions stay in the past. Stop bringing them up"

-Bill Clinton

Now, I know Bill's not guilty of all of that........but you're acting like Trump's the first to accomplish some of those feats.

I know.......facts suck sometimes.

-I have no need to disown my statements.

And yet you whine when I accurately reference them.

"He's not at all a loathsome human being who is a known fraud, serial sexual predator, pedo, liar, adulterer ect ect ect."

did you or did you not type that?

And I don't disagree with you on that. But I used it to partially describe JFK.....and then you lose your ----.

Why? Do you disagree that JFK was guilty of everything I assigned to him?

Why such hostility in response?

Because perhaps you're not very smart? And you're upset you're not being allowed to win an argument?

-Intentionally misstating people's comments and inserting your own BS assumptions isn't "winning an argument," dumbf*&^.

I didn't misstate your comment. I cut and pasted them.

I merely offered up a contextual comparison to past victims of political violence and you got your wittle feewings hurt.

Imagine what I could do to your feelings if I were TRYING to hurt them?

wow......that would be ugly.