What's sad is that this is what about 33% of population want.

What does that say about how trashy and immoral they are?

Remember when the idiot righties claimed Putin was afraid of Trump? LOL

Yet more evidence that the right is entirely incompetent when it comes to the economy.

This is, of course, a big problem.

We know that those at the top support Trump in a purely transactional capacity while the idiots in the base genuinely believe.

The only potential saving grace that could set us apart from history is that they may not latch on to a successor as tightly as they have to Trump.

We can only hope.

As for an additional comment on when Trump dies, I still think we'll see story after story of people being arrested for spitting on his corpse if he's laid in state (God I hope he's not honored in that way). Or possibly even worse...

So we're officially at war now?

#83 | Posted by sentinel

No, that's just a phrase that an idiot like Pete would chirp because they realize they're in over their head.

Some of the more salient points stressed were that you don't shoot distressed airmen under parachute, and you don't shoot distressed seaman whose ship has been sunk.

#77 | Posted by madbomber

You do when you're an overcompensating piece of s(*& like Trump or Hegseth.

If I were a drone guy right now, I'd be terrified.

#76 | Posted by madbomber

Doubly so as we're watching them kick the can of responsibility down the chain of command.

To be honest, I'm actually kind of glad this is playing out this way. It's illustrating in clear as day real time examples to any and all members of the military that they sure as s*&^ won't receive any support for actions taken under command for this administration. Hopefully it's instilling some much needed hesitancy in following orders given by the upper level f(*& ups in this administration.

"I was on this"
on this? WTF does that mean?

#75 | Posted by eberly

It means this story is like your wife?

You have his tax return? Do you even have his name?
#65 | Posted by eberly

You're trying too hard to be pedantic.

All the harder to understand why someone with Bradley's storied career would obey an illegal order. He had to know. He also had to know that Hegseth was a complete duffus.
Did they both buy into the silly notion that Trump had their back?
#49 | Posted by Twinpac

You don't think there are active-duty military who are guzzling the kool aid?

Lumpers upset Trump is going to horn into their gravy train

STFU you stupid fake pile of s*&^.

as a way to secure long-term peace.

Was this phrase typed with a straight face?

Anyway, this is MAGA in a nutshell.

It's the prime example of why anyone who voted for Trump more than once should never be allowed to vote again. Ever.

They're too ---- stupid to be trusted with such a responsibility.

A troubling new report card on the first six months of Patel's leadership concludes he is "in over his head" and his deputy, Dan Bongino, is "something of a clown,"

Nobody could have guessed...

As valid a decision as his "closing" of Venezuelan air space.

this is why they are stupidly called Lumpers.

Only by you you stupid f*&^ing moron.

a provision requiring the FBI to alert Congress if it opens a counterintelligence investigation (CII) into an elected official or candidate.

The disgusting harpy cow sounds worried. I wonder why that is.

Anyways, more chirping from the peanut gallery that she hopes will finally get her some sort of position in this administration in exchange for the soul she sold long ago.

That isn't a GIF, idiot

#23 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY

Give the guy a break. His entire life is nothing more than 'good enough for government work.'

I guess Obama should too. he dropped over 22,000 bombs killing innocent folks, nothing said from the Left

#10 | Posted by Maverick

Well, I am completely shocked that a Trumper idiot would be so clueless as to what the actual situation is.

But we can pardon (and support) Hamas for killing 1200 civilians.
If liberals didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any standards. Would really be nice if one of the parties would come even close to practicing what they preach.

#5 | Posted by humtake

If you didn't have bulls*&^ false equivalencies and flat out lies you'd have nothing to say.

Idiot.

You have a very poor understanding of what principles are.

Not as poor as yours if you think racism and sexism are principles.

So I should have knowingly thrown away my vote by writing in "Bernie?"
How would that have advanced the goals set forth in my principles?
Explain.

#152 | Posted by snoofy

No, you should have taken it under advisement and decided on whether or not voting for Hillary was ok with you.

If you simply did it because Bernie asked, well, you're just a follower.

'I'm right because you're a sexist and racist but don't even know you're a sexist and racist!'

Like I said, white knights tend to be patronizing and unbearable.

BTW those would be classified as biases, not principles.

You're accusing me of not having principles because I... did what Bernie asked?
#147 | Posted by snoofy

IMO, yes. If you're so flimsy in your opinions you drop them at the behest of an individual, you don't really hold them too dearly.

What makes me think that?

The fact that you can't understand why Bernie supporters wouldn't abandon the positions that made them support Bernie to begin with simply because Bernie said so.

Only someone devoid of genuine values and principles would be such a political windsock and expect others to be as well.

I don't disagree.

However, other countries also went through waves of poultry flock culling to try and mitigate avian influenza. They're still doing it even now.