Is this your best attempt at trolling?
I expected more from the man voted the nooner's best truck stop,---------- attendant.

#166 | Posted by ClownShack

Interesting that you revert to that stupid s*&^ instead of actually saying what she's done.

It's almost as if she doesn't have much in the way of accomplishments...

As i said above, how is a progressive supposed to accomplish anything when the DNC and RNC both oppose them?

Ahhhh yes. The Man is holding her down...

His court cavalierly overturns precedence and poofs new ridiculous tests into existence.

People rightfully view his court as a political tool run by partisans.

Roberts whines that people accurately sees his court as a political tool run by partisans.

He makes a statement about not overturning precedence.

His political tool of a court run by partisans continues to overturn precedence simply because it's politically inconvenient.

Roberts will continue to get whine that his court is viewed as a political tool run by partisans.

China? Just China?

I don't think so.

OS: You are more than welcome to look up the definition of the word tenure ; )

#159 | Posted by MSgt

Condescension only works when you're NOT one of the dumbest turds on the site.

You poor thing.
She's accomplished more than you, and most people have.

Like what?

Face it, you're as bad as Trumpers following her cult of personality.

An undeniable truth:

The only undeniable truth is you're a f*&^ing moron.

LOL idiots ....
She introduced the Green New Deal - a corporate donation of Trillions of dollars to corporations.
#154 | Posted by oneironaut

Except Green New Deal is an international movement that began in the 2000s.

LOL idiot...

#11 yes, you're right. Someone seeded a cruise with Hanta virus weeks before the Disney story broke in national news that anyone could read to distract from the story that was publicized.

Can you taste the stupid?

#149 that's a little over the top.

AOC hasn't accomplished much. I'm sorry, but it's true.

You could start with evidence and law although I doubt you will.

It's an improvement that he didn't post a link to a social media meme.

When I worked in the dessert SW it was mostly the Native Americans getting sick and dying from this virus. Come to find out, they're more susceptible because rather than going pick their own pine nuts, they were robbing rodent nests with cashes already gathered.

#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds

That's gross and disturbing on several levels.

If you are racist, and you see a black pilot, you'll think "Boy, I sure hope he's qualified!"

Difference being the racist in your hypothetical assumes that without knowing a thing about the pilot whereas we knew the qualifications of Harris.

We knew she was the first to drop out of the 2020 primary having never broken 1% support.

We know she was an unremarkable and largely absent VP instead of building her reputation in such an amazing opportunity.

We know she was installed in that position in 2020 assuming she would be next in line and she did nothing to earn that, she just assumed it.

We knew what her platform was and it wasn't remarkable or solid enough to pull people past the "not Trump" underpinnings of the entire 2024 Dem campaign.

It was far from an assumption based on race or sex.

The electorate hates the insurance industry. They want a candidate who terrifies the insurance industry. Same as the utility industry. Same as the tech titans.
The electorate wants someone who fill fight back. Dems refused to give them that option, so they turned to trump.

#124 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

I agree entirely with the except of turning to Trump.

The electorate didn't turn to Trump. Trump kept his voter base and gained a small fraction of new votes (about 3 million IIRC).

Trump won not by being appealing to voters, he won by attrition and convincing people they shouldn't vote.

I'd put misogyny on the list of reasons for her loss.
I wouldn't strike it from the list. Would you?

#123 | Posted by snoofy

Of course, not. Read the nonsense from people like shrimpd*&^ or lfthndcuck et al and it's obvious that it was present.

But I'm not sure I would even put it in the top five reasons she lost considering those types weren't going to vote for her anyway.

Amy Klobuchar, Gretchen Whitmer, Kirsten Gillibrand, Kamala Harris (no), AOC (no), Elissa Slotkin, Michelle Lujan Grisham, Maura Healey. Source ballotpedia.org

#120 | Posted by snoofy

What's your point?

I'd have to look into them a bit more because I recognize names but don't know enough about their politics and experiences to give a quick answer.

I already said that.

Is this where you start arguing with yourself in the form of a strawman position you're going to claim I hold?

The Soros machine would like a word with you.

#16 | Posted by lfthndthrds

I don't think you can name her.

#115 | Posted by snoofy

Off the top of my head, no I couldn't.

So, does that mean Harris lost because misogyny?

I'll bet that hurt to click "post."

I'm starting to think you're just an anti-Dem mole.

You can't post on any thread without railing on Dems and AIPAC but are mysteriously ALWAYS silent about the stronger connection between the GOP and AIPAC and the much stronger support the GOP gives Israeli actions abroad.

Right, so instead of breaking up the monopoly that strangles domestic producers and costs consumers, they just try to import more beef.

And people think these idiots are adept bithnithmen?

You have Admit, Rich Jews DO get Better Representation at All Levels than Everyone Else.

It seems rich anyone gets better representation than anyone else, sport.

But go ahead, keep letting that bigotry bubble up to the surface.

Why is it that everything to you is through the filter of Bibi, Israel, and your clear hatred of ...

He does seem to have an exceedingly unhealthy obsession with that singular issue.

How is your response functionally any different than when Republicans say teaching about slavery is bad because it makes the white people feel bad?
Same concept in play, just being applied to sexism. No?

#110 | Posted by snoofy

Sure, if you've buried your head so far up social wedge issues a&& that you can only see it through that lens as opposed to, oh I don't know, seeing it through reality that Harris was a terrible candidate who was handed the nomination she couldn't win on her own when she entered a primary after four unremarkable years of an extremely low profile VP stint?

But you're right, it's simply because she's a woman.

pick a woman with more credentials than "its her turn" or a SELECTED
illiterate ---- who's only claim to fame...( other than "servicing" willie brown"
was repeating this stupid chit ....what can be, unburdened by what has been"

#103 | Posted by shrimptacodan

You know, people might treat you a little less harshly if you weren't such a proudly degenerate loser piece of s*&^.

Just sayin'.