Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

LAMPLIGHTER

Subscribe to LAMPLIGHTER+'s blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Wednesday, April 08, 2026

Ghost Murmur was described as a futuristic CIA tool that could detect a heartbeat from vast distances. Physicists say the public story clashes with the basic limits of magnetic sensing read more


US Vice President JD Vance has criticized EU leaders and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy during his visit to Hungary, echoing Prime Minister Viktor Orban's campaign messaging. The Kremlin chimed in from Moscow, too. read more


Tuesday, April 07, 2026

Since returning to the White House in 2025, President Donald Trump has ramped up immigration detention, with private contractors operating much of the required infrastructure -- and reaping hundreds of millions of dollars in Immigration and Customs Enforcement contracts after making significant contributions to the president's political operations. read more


A poll of 2,000 children aged 11-17 found 44% feel peer pressure to be online, leading to lost sleep, skipped meals and increased stress levels. read more


Last August, as part of the federal government's crackdown on people in the country illegally, the Trump administration sent states the names of hundreds of thousands of Medicaid enrollees with orders to determine whether they were ineligible based on immigration status. But seven months later, findings from five states shared with KFF Health News show that the reviews have uncovered little evidence of a widespread problem. read more


Comments

@#9

From that article ...

... On February 11, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrived at the White House with a clear objective: persuade US President Donald Trump that the time had come to strike Iran. Inside the Situation Room, in a tightly controlled and highly classified setting, Netanyahu delivered a detailed military and intelligence briefing.

Flanked virtually by Israel's top security officials, he laid out a compelling case for immediate action. Iran, he argued, was vulnerable. Its defenses could be dismantled, its leadership targeted, and its regime weakened to the point of collapse.

Trump's response was brief but decisive. "Sounds good to me." That moment set the United States on a path toward war.

Within hours, US intelligence agencies began evaluating the Israeli proposal. Their conclusions were sharply different.

American officials agreed that targeted military strikes could degrade Iran's capabilities. But the broader goal of regime change was dismissed as unrealistic.

CIA Director John Ratcliffe described that aspect of the plan as "farcical." Secretary of State Marco Rubio was even more direct: "In other words, it's bu11sh!t."

Rubio clarified his position in strategic terms. Limited military objectives were achievable. Regime change was not. "If our goal is regime change or an uprising, we shouldn't do it. But if the goal is to destroy Iran's missile program, that's a goal we can achieve."

The debate within Trump's inner circle revealed deep divisions, not over whether Iran posed a threat, but over how far the United States should go.

Vice President JD Vance emerged as the most consistent voice of caution. He warned that a full-scale war could spiral unpredictably, destabilize the region, and strain American resources. "You know I think this is a bad idea, but if you want to do it, I'll support you."

Rubio, meanwhile, took a pragmatic middle ground, skeptical of diplomacy but cautious about escalation.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth argued the opposite. In his view, confrontation with Iran was inevitable. If conflict were coming, delaying it would only raise the cost.

Warnings from military and political advisers

Behind the scenes, concerns extended beyond strategy. White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles worried about the broader consequences, economic shocks, rising oil prices, and the risk of another prolonged conflict in the Middle East.

Military leaders raised operational concerns. A war with Iran could deplete US weapons stockpiles and expose vulnerabilities in global supply chains. Securing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical oil transit route, would be a major challenge. Yet these warnings were presented as risks, not red lines. No one directly moved to block the president's decision. ...


How Donald Trump took the US into war with Iran: Inside the White House decision
www.wionews.com

... On February 11, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrived at the White House with a clear objective: persuade US President Donald Trump that the time had come to strike Iran. Inside the Situation Room, in a tightly controlled and highly classified setting, Netanyahu delivered a detailed military and intelligence briefing.

Flanked virtually by Israel's top security officials, he laid out a compelling case for immediate action. Iran, he argued, was vulnerable. Its defenses could be dismantled, its leadership targeted, and its regime weakened to the point of collapse.

Trump's response was brief but decisive. "Sounds good to me." That moment set the United States on a path toward war.

Within hours, US intelligence agencies began evaluating the Israeli proposal. Their conclusions were sharply different.

American officials agreed that targeted military strikes could degrade Iran's capabilities. But the broader goal of regime change was dismissed as unrealistic.

CIA Director John Ratcliffe described that aspect of the plan as "farcical." Secretary of State Marco Rubio was even more direct: "In other words, it's bu11sh!t."

Rubio clarified his position in strategic terms. Limited military objectives were achievable. Regime change was not. "If our goal is regime change or an uprising, we shouldn't do it. But if the goal is to destroy Iran's missile program, that's a goal we can achieve."

The debate within Trump's inner circle revealed deep divisions, not over whether Iran posed a threat, but over how far the United States should go.

Vice President JD Vance emerged as the most consistent voice of caution. He warned that a full-scale war could spiral unpredictably, destabilize the region, and strain American resources. "You know I think this is a bad idea, but if you want to do it, I'll support you."

Rubio, meanwhile, took a pragmatic middle ground, skeptical of diplomacy but cautious about escalation.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth argued the opposite. In his view, confrontation with Iran was inevitable. If conflict were coming, delaying it would only raise the cost.

Warnings from military and political advisers

Behind the scenes, concerns extended beyond strategy. White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles worried about the broader consequences, economic shocks, rising oil prices, and the risk of another prolonged conflict in the Middle East.

Military leaders raised operational concerns. A war with Iran could deplete US weapons stockpiles and expose vulnerabilities in global supply chains. Securing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical oil transit route, would be a major challenge. Yet these warnings were presented as risks, not red lines. No one directly moved to block the president's decision. ...



More from the article ...

... On Monday afternoon President Donald Trump and CIA Director John Ratcliffe hinted at technology that had helped locate a downed American Air Force officer hiding in a mountain crevice in southern Iran.

By Tuesday, the New York Post reported that the CIA had deployed Ghost Murmur, a device that uses vaguely described "long-range quantum magnetometry" to find signals of human heartbeats, after which artificial intelligence software isolates each heartbeat from the noisy data. An unnamed source told the Post it was like "hearing a voice in a stadium, except the stadium is a thousand square miles of desert." Another line landed like a movie tagline: "In the right conditions, if your heart is beating, we will find you."

It's a terrific story.

It is also, according to scientists who study magnetic fields, almost certainly not true. The rescue was real -- the mission involved multiple aircraft and a survival beacon carried by the airman -- but Ghost Murmur, at least as publicly described, finds no support in decades of peer-reviewed physics, even with the help of AI, experts told me.

Quantum magnetometers are real; they are ultraprecise at, for instance, detecting heart arrhythmias by measuring magnetic fields (via quantum properties) produced by the cardiac muscle.

The problem is that the heart's magnetic field is weak. "At the surface of the chest, where you're about 10 centimeters away from the source, the magnetic field is just barely detectable," says John Wikswo, a professor of biomedical engineering and physics at Vanderbilt University. "Now, [if] instead of going 10 centimeters away -- which is a tenth of a meter -- you go a meter away, the amplitude of the signal has dropped to a thousandth of what it was." The signal becomes dramatically weaker at a kilometer.

Wikswo was the first scientist to measure the magnetic field of an isolated nerve and has been measuring the heart's magnetic field since the mid-1970s. ...


Also this ...

Testing suggests Google's AI Overviews tell millions of lies per hour
arstechnica.com

... Looking up information on Google today means confronting AI Overviews, the Gemini-powered search robot that appears at the top of the results page.

AI Overviews has had a rough time since its 2024 launch, attracting user ire over its scattershot accuracy, but it's getting better and usually provides the right answer. T

hat's a low bar, though. A new analysis from The New York Times attempted to assess the accuracy of AI Overviews, finding it's right 90 percent of the time.

The flip side is that 1 in 10 AI answers is wrong, and for Google, that means hundreds of thousands of lies going out every minute of the day. ...


@#5 ... Same thing in law. ...

Yup.

Penalties stack up as AI spreads through the legal system
www.npr.org

... When it comes to using AI, it seems lawyers just can't help themselves.

Last year saw a rapid increase in court sanctions against attorneys for filing briefs containing errors generated by artificial intelligence tools. The most prominent case was that of the lawyers for MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, who were fined $3,000 each for filing briefs containing fictitious, AI-generated citations.

But as a cautionary tale, it doesn't seem to have had much effect.

"Recently we had 10 cases from 10 different courts on a single day," says Damien Charlotin, a researcher at the business school HEC Paris who keeps a worldwide tally of instances of courts sanctioning people for using erroneous information generated by AI. ...


@#5 ... What WAS a surprise was the 25% drop in the winning margin. ...

Yup.

Another view ...

A wow moment': Democrats' election hot streak goes scorching
www.politico.com

... Democrats just had one of their best election nights since President Donald Trump returned to the White House. Again.

In Wisconsin's Supreme Court election, the Democratic-backed candidate sailed to a nearly 20-point landslide victory Tuesday in a battleground Trump carried less than two years ago. Meanwhile, a Georgia Democrat slashed Trump's margin of victory by two thirds in the state's reddest district despite losing the election " the most significant overperformance the party has seen across all seven House special elections so far this cycle. ...




Related ...

Pam Bondi still on the hook for Epstein testimony, Oversight panel says
www.politico.com

... House Republicans indicated Wednesday they will continue to seek sworn testimony from Pam Bondi on the Justice Department's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, even after her ousting as attorney general.

The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed Bondi for an April 14 deposition, but that date was never confirmed by Bondi, and the panel said in a statement that it will continue to seek a date for her testimony.

"The Department of Justice has stated Pam Bondi will not appear on April 14 for a deposition since she is no longer Attorney General and was subpoenaed in her capacity as Attorney General," a spokeswoman for Oversight Republicans said in a statement. "The Committee will contact Pam Bondi's personal counsel to discuss next steps regarding scheduling her deposition." ...


Pakistan PM seeks two-week extension to Trump's deadline on Iran
www.reuters.com

... Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Wednesday requested that U.S. President Donald Trump make a two-week extension to a deadline he imposed on Iran to end its blockade of Gulf oil.

"To allow diplomacy to run its course, I earnestly request President Trump to extend the deadline for two weeks. Pakistan, in all sincerity, requests the Iranian brothers to open Strait of Hormuz for a corresponding period of two weeks as a goodwill gesture," Sharif said in a post on X. ...


Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy