WHICH TURNIP TOOK MY NAME 3 TIMES???

Posted by Monkeybars at 2025-12-08 11:56 AM | Reply

I did. Your point??

Monkeybars Monkeybars monkeybars

Must have one parent who is here legally, according to Trump.
That would prevent people from exploiting the birthright law.

#17 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-12-07 12:23 AM | Reply

Then they can break the laws of this land with impunity. Because you can't have it both ways.

Racist bigots much

Question, if an illegal alien is not "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" then by what jurisdiction can that person be prosecuted for crimes committed "thereof?"

Posted by et_al at 2025-12-06 02:10 AM | Reply

If SCOTUS rules in Trump's favour. What's the chance of doing away with birthright citizenship for Trump's perceived enemies?? Ours aren't safe and secure either.

Trump is the neediest of presidents that we've ever had. He's a toddler in a suit.

Plenty is achievable. The question is whether manufacturers will put the resources into achieving what is beneficial to our society and humanity without regulatory pressures.
Since corporations are in the "business" of selling stuff, and not helping humanity, my money is on them continuing to seek profit. There is little profit to be had on a quarterly basis from cutting fuel consumption when it costs the manufacturers sales, because most consumers are far more motivated by sales price than getting a couple more miles to the gallon.

Posted by censored at 2025-12-05 09:56 PM | Reply

Bears repeating

God forbid we have cleaner more fuel efficient cars on the roads. God the stupidity of it all just reaks.

By my count 17 threads on the back age are topics not related to Trump. Are those all "distractions" too?

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-12-04 09:39 PM | Reply

Yeppers pretty much so.

Conservatives are so corrupt these days.

Jake Tappers book is expensive toilet paper.

Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-04 07:16 PM | Reply

Not when it lands up in the dollar bin.

I guess threads like these are a good thing. If Jeff didn't post such balderdash we would think there was something wrong with him. Just sayin

What a garbage pile thread. Wouldn't you know it Jeff is the author of said thread.

Look in the mirror. Just because you are a partisan hack doesn't mean everyone else is too.

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-12-04 01:37 AM | Reply

Says a partisan hack.

Physician heal thyself

She will obviously be let out. Then she will flee the country.

Posted by REDIAL at 2025-12-04 12:36 AM | Reply

Of course she will. Trump will see to that.

Can you point to a single major accomplishment from Trump's presidency that Harris would have pulled off?
Just the border....if she had won it would be worse than ever.
I don't regret voting for Trump at all.

Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-12-03 11:29 PM | Reply

We would be in far better shape had Kamala won. There's no question about that. We wouldn't be sinking financially like we are today. As far as the border is concerned. That's a red herring. Neither party is totally for open borders. The last two presidents that were for open borders were Reagan and Bush 41. The border is also a scapegoat for what's wrong with America. Truth be told. White Americanz are afraid of becoming a minority race in this country. Why do you think they are clamoring for total border closure.

Laura,
Whatever she is, she lost.
I will not vote Democrat. Is that better?

Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-12-03 09:49 PM | Reply

Ok that being said. You voted for a traitor to the United States of America and a misogynist. Let the record reflect on where BillJohnson's vote went to. Just sayin

I voted against Harris because she's either a puppet or over her head. Regardless she's a liberal and I don't like them anymore.

Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-12-03 07:01 PM | Reply

Kamala is not a liberal. Lord knows I wished she was. Let me guess. You voted against Kamala because she's a woman and you are a misogynist. Am I correct on that?? Correct me if I am wrong BillJohnson.

My prediction is this will be the argument this administration will make regarding these boat attacks:
If our airspace were to be breached by hostile we don't need an act of Congress for an act of self defense. Therefore, since these narcoterrorists are attempting to bring poison into our country and kill our citizens with it this is also an act of self defense.
Does that justification actually work? I seriously doubt it.

#88 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-12-02 11:02 PM | Reply

Drug smuggling is a criminal act. It's not an act of war therefore it's not an act of self defense to blow it up. Unless of course they draw first blood THEN it would be an act of self defense. Just sayin.

Do you, Trumpers?"
I'm not sure I qualify as a "Trumper", though I did vote for him. I don't approve of everything he does.
Having said that, based on all new information I've seen and the outcome of events, I would again.
I think commuting his sentence sounds fishy.
That's about as far as I can go.
I don't know enough about the case or what motivated his decision.
The truth is, nobody on this site does either, no matter how brilliant or informed they think they are.

Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-12-02 11:34 PM | Reply

Of course you are a cultist and a MAGA Trumper. At least be honest for once. He could shoot a loved one and you would STILL vote for Trump.

Yiddish originated in Central Europe in the 9th century.
A unique language, it is composed mostly of insults.
#11 | Posted by sit_goodboy at 2025-12-01 08:13 PM | Reply
Schlameel.

Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-01 11:27 PM | Reply

Reminds me of Laverne and Shirley.

Here's your dementia Jeff.

Oneironut carries Trumps water.
#26 | Posted by Alexandrite
He carries Trump's diapers.

Posted by Sycophant at 2025-11-30 11:30 PM | Reply

He carries Trump's watery diapers.

There's right NOW more evidence Walz over looked sending American taxpayer money via Fraud to a known terrorist
than to Trump being a rapist of underage girls.
But you'll continue with your one topic diatribe until the bitter end, its what SYCODEFELCTOR's do.

Posted by oneironaut at 2025-11-30 10:25 PM | Reply

You're such a fraudster it's not even funny anymore. What a travesty you are.