Ukraine is winning, why do they need more of their men?

Residents of Charlotte NC may provide assistance to their neighbors before ICE and Border Patrol arrive:

The PM has diplomatic immunity so NY can't arrest him.

The US does not recognize the ICC and did not sign the Rome Statute. The US has no obligation to honor the warrant.

No non-Federal authority can arrest him. Unlawful arrest would be illegal.

Eberly, what makes no sense about employers getting away with hiring illegals, is the form i9.

The government would hit the employer with penalties of they don't have a name and social matching up. The government has to know that the employee has either a false number or is using a number given to them that can't be used for employment.

"An international arrest warrant for war crimes issued by the ICC remains active for Russia President Vladimir Putin"

The US doesn't recognize the ICC. The US will not subject itself to that court so why should the US care about the warrant?

This will really hurt is Presidential campaign.

Just move the United Nations out of NYC and put it in Gaza.

#14 Eberly "However, a Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration audit this year revealed that 25% of nondomiciled CDLs were issued out of compliance with federal regulations. The audit found "systemic non-compliance" in California, Colorado, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, and Washington." From the Washington Examiner

Might as well sue the parents for negligence for sending their kids into a flood zone. If the area is known to be flood prone, the parents weren't diligent in protecting their kids. Why didn't the parents prepare their kids with life vests, and made sure they had an escape plan.

The names being protected are known by both parties.

This is bigger than Trump and Clinton. Royalty? That's just one name.

Every who said they wanted names released suddenly go silent.

How many in Congress or no longer are involved. How many in Hollywood? How many of the wealthiest?

This is the conspiracy stories like JFK and RFK. 70 years later and names are still redacted.

Why? Because it'll take someone who doesn't care about tomorrow to throw it to the wind.

I agree- we'll never know if it's *all* the emails, etc.

All the files need to be released. Not a few, but all. Again, the reactions cause a lot of problems with any release.

Where's the physical evidence? As much as emails are there, it's not enough.

Been on a jury. To convict, there has to be more.

Who cares which party. Considering the royalty overseas already sees the potential fallout, this isn't isolated to a few.

Where is all the evidence of the DC Madam? JFK and RFK.

Damn, who is being protected after 70 years?

With leaks like this,hopefully more will spill on all the rest, and finally it all comes out.

Doubt it... emails is crumbs.

900+ US Foreign military bases to cut.

"That's amazing! I've got the same combination on my luggage!".

If Trump wants a shutdown to continue, he can simply veto the CR.

When Epstein's list is disclosed, can they get the DC Madam's list, too?

America is bankrupting due to two parties' actions.

When a couple keep borrowing and growing the debt, the amount they borrow doesn't change the interest rate, and since the amount owed isn't decreasing, the end result is the same.

stare decisis and race was Brown v. Board of Education, which directly overturned the precedent set in Plessy v. Ferguson .

SCOTUS makes decisions all the time based on that period of time's thinking.

There is no problem reversing prior decisions.

Especially when court decisions are known beforehand based on their personal belief.

Too often, a final decision can be guessed because of who put them on the bench. That is why SCOTUS should constantly challenge prior decisions.

Bad decisions based on ideology.

Obama wanted a clean CR without interference from the opposing party. He didn't try to work with them. He wanted their votes to pass the CR.

Obamacare had to be passed before finding out what's in it.

Pelosi gaffed, telling the local elected officials assembled that Congress "[has] to pass the bill so you can find out what's in it, away from the fog of controversy."

#27: I was a steward for several years. I prevented employees from being fired because managers had no clue how to document employee actions.

As a manager,I fired two because I knew how to prove to the union the employees didn't do their job.

What I hated? The union lawyers conceded contract issues that us employees didn't agree with.

I sat on a panel representing employees and argued with the idiot union lawyers. The changes by management were so costly and not employee friendly. I ditched the union in the end because they sided more with management and got fringes for doing so.

When the Democrats and Republicans have full control, this 'heist' never stopped.

Did the Republicans reverse all the Democrat passed laws that taxed the rich?

No,of course not.

How about spending? Did the Democrats pass surplus after surplus and paid down the debt?

No. They didn't. They ran deficits too. The ND went up. When the interest rates were ridiculously low, the US was lucky the debt interest was too. Otherwuse,it would have compounded at the rate it is now.

Both parties suck.

Two parties have had the entire Legislative and Executive branches to have surpluses and pay off the National Debt, make permanent actions.

Neither have done this.
No president has vetoed bills to force Congress to stop having deficits.

The National Debt is a joint effort be Democrats and Republicans.

Lower deficit spending doesn't stop the bleeding debt.

2013 Obama said pass a clean CR
All of this is entirely preventable if the House chooses to do what the Senate has already done -- and that's the simple act of funding our government without making extraneous and controversial demands in the process, the same way other Congresses have for more than 200 years.

So, she takes her fiance's car, and it has a govt license plate.

She may win her case. Her fiance may lose their job.

There will need to be more daycare centers. Background checks.
What is the permitted cost to charge?
Since the government is offering vouchers, childcare centers can now charge more.
Does personal income reduce the amount of the vouchers?
What happens if the childcare cost increases thanks to vouchers?