Re: #869

Riots occur when a group has no power and is only able to vent their frustration. Why would any MAGA/GOP riot? They control all three branches of government and (sorry Charlie) this killing is at best a minor blip/setback. It is not a loss of a keystone to their power. If anything, this gives them a "Remember the Alamo" martyr. As history has shown, a martyr is extremely valuable and essentially impossible to counter.

PROVE ME WRONG!

"I always enjoy when you guys run your mouths and then a simple Snopes check proves that I'm correct ...
www.snopes.com
#23 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-09-10 08:06 AM"

Is the following post the one that you claim is correct:
" Well Clown, I watched the Border under Biden become one mass processing facility to let anyone and everyone in with zero regard to who they were as people. Anyways, we're shipping them back and locking them up. Now we're going after criminals who happen to be citizens in case you haven't noticed.
#19 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-09-10 01:22 AM"

If so, the Snopes link you cited disagrees:

"This claim was true, in that the number of more than 7.2 million immigrants specifically reflected border encounters with U.S. officials, according to data provided on the U.S. Customs and Border Protection website " not an increase of that magnitude in the immigrant population."

and

"The Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, published an article on Jan. 5, 2024, contending that 'data from the Trump era clearly show that, if he were in office, Trump would not be deporting any more border crossers than Biden has.' "

"Then why is Trump talking about it?

Because Nobel Peace Prize laureate Barack Obama is from there.
#5 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-09-01 01:22 PM"

Possibly, but then so is Pope Leo XIV. Proving, once again, coincidence is not causality.

It's much more likely President Trump is looking for something (ANYTHING!) to defect attention away from the Epstein Files.

"Assuming the reported numbers are even correct - $1 million per day for 35 days is $35 million. Your number is WAY off. Astronomically so.
Typo on your part?
#14 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER AT 2025-08-29 02:43 AM"

Day-am.
That's about the cost of one Birthday Parade!

LOL!

Locally Yokeley

I'd suggest they consult with a thermal engineer before spending ("wasting") money on paint. Yes, a black paint will absorb more infrared ("heat") from the Sun, but that is only while the Sun is shining. After the Sun sets, a black-painted wall has higher emissivity and will radiant its heat more rapidly. Not only will that lower the walls temperature faster, this will occur during darkness which, I suspect, is probably a preferable time for climbing over the wall.

Re: #80

That would result in three less red reps and two additional blue reps: a net change of five reps!

It's becoming more clear why Texas is trying to gerrymander five seats to favor red reps.

"Texas is already gerrymandered blue
Party Republican Democratic
Last election 25 13
Seats won 25 13
Popular vote 6,235,017 4,311,123
Percentage 58.41% 40.39%
40% blue but 52% blue reps
#21 | Posted by easy_meat at 2025-08-19 12:41 PM"

Using your percentages:
This should result in 22% red reps; 15 blue reps.

Please explain how this indicates Texas is already gerrymandered blue.

"40% blue but 52% blue reps
#21 | Posted by easy_meat
25 Republicans and 13 Democrats
Thats 52% Democrats.
--Republicans
#27 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-19 12:54 PM"

Vernon's calculator strikes again?

It's just a jump to the left,
Then a step to the right ...

"#20 | Posted by LampLighter
Another way I was taught was to multiply C by 9, divide by 5, and add 32.
A little easier without a calculator ...
#22 | POSTED BY AMERICANUNITY AT 2025-08-17 01:49 AM"

When dealing with 10's of C, it's even easier to multiply by 2 and divide by 10 (move the decimal point one place to the left) before multiplying by 9 and then adding 32.

One learned to evaluate math problems and then do easy/simple calculations in one's head in the days before calculators. It's a very useful skill.

"Because something is happening here but you don't know what it is
Do you, Mr. Jones?"

- Ballad of a Thin Man by Robert Zimmerman

"Zelensky is not invited to the peace negotiations with Putin because Putin doesn't want him there but the desadline for sanctions has arrived without sanctions!. Trump looks clueless and pathetic.
#5 | Posted by danni at 2025-08-10 09:05 PM"

If President Trump wants to set the tone for his meeting with President Putin, he should implement the sanctions as scheduled.
THAT would be 'Art of the Deal' and would send a message that stalling is not an option.

PIECE IN OUR TIME ...

Personal note: Although born in Cleveland (OH), his family moved to Milwaukee (WI) [my home town] when he was five. He grew up in Milwaukee and eventually went to UW-Madison (WI) [my Alma Mater]. Milwaukee likes to claim him as "their" hometown astronaut due to his numerous connections with the city. I had an opportunity to hear him speak in Milwaukee in the late Sixties (post Apollo 8; pre Apollo 13). After his talk, I strolled onto the stage and introduced myself. He was very personable and eager to chat about astronomy and NASA. Being star-struck, I asked for his autograph (which he was delighted to give me and I still have).

Does this mean the present administration is being conducted under the influence?

It would explain a lot.

US adds 73,000 jobs, trailing estimates
Payrolls for prior month revised sharply downward
Jobless rate rises even as more leave workforce
Treasury yields slide; stock futures fall

"Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin called E-Verify a reliable, accurate tool for verifying work authorization, but blasted Old Orchard Beach police for their 'reckless reliance' on it."

Why would using a "reliable, accurate tool" be considered "reckless reliance"?

E-verify likely is not 100% accurate (duh!), but several evaluations claim its accuracy is greater than 99%!
When was using a tool that was 99+% accurate ever considered "reckless reliance"?

Re: #12

"Correlation is a statistical relationship, while coincidence is a matter of timing and chance. Correlation doesn't necessarily mean causation, and a correlation can sometimes be a coincidence."

Coincidence is not causality.

The phrase "coincidence is not causality" is a way of expressing the idea that simply because two events occur together does not mean one caused the other.

" 'Wage gains used to outpace inflation for more Americans.
So this actually means more Americans are losing.
#17 | Posted by snoofy'

They didn't for the full 4 years under Biden -------.
#20 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-28 02:09 AM"

Not exactly correct:

"U.S. inflation rate versus wage growth 2020-2025
Published by Abigail Tierney May 8, 2025
In March 2025, inflation amounted to 2.4 percent, while wages grew by 4.3 percent. The inflation rate has not exceeded the rate of wage growth since January 2023.

My brother mentioned that his last name (Lehrer) translates from the Deutsch into "teacher". He definitely was true to his namesake.

The passing of a national treasure.

Here's one of my favorites (amongst SO MANY!):

Re: #25

Just as I suspected. Apparently it is too hard for you as several posters (especially #28) have pointed out that passage you cite does not support your claim. Feel free to try again LOL!