Jeff the internet troll calls one of the most brilliant jurists in decades, a hack.

one of the dumbest posters on the DR agrees with him

Just another day of idiots lowering our nation's IQ

I see that by posting facts I demonstrated that I was right

Like always

Truth Hurts

Jeff is a liar

So I guess Sed in the in "attack with a weed whacker is no big deal" camp.

#58 | Posted by BellRinger a

He attacked no one with a weed whacker, liar

When he was punched in the head he no longer had the weed whacker on him,

In fact, when the ICE thugs BEGAN punching him he was pinned to the ground by multiple ICE thugs with his hands behind his back

Only scum defend the ICE thugs

And again, this began with your assertion:

People aren't being assaulted.

#33 | Posted by BellRinger

You lied, liar.

Facts

man was landscaping

a bunch of armed, masked men jump out of unmarked cars and start screaming at him

He is holding a weed whacker

He waves the weed whacker in the general direction of the masked men-NO WHERE NEAR THEM

He runs in terror

He is sprayed with pepper spray

He is tackled to the ground

His hands are placed behind his back

Multiple ICE thugs are on top of him and holding him down

Only then did an ICE agent BEGIN punching him in the head

You have been informed and educated. Be a better person.

No, idiot, he wasn't assaulting the ICE thugs before being beaten

No, idiot, he wasn't assaulting the ICE thugs before being beaten

People aren't being assaulted.

#33 | Posted by BellRinger

Liar

Where is Iran's stockpile of 60% refined uranium?

How many bombs could they make with that uranium?

How many centrifuges does Iran still have?

I've chosen my words regarding this strike carefully. I have t used absolute definitives. It's difficult to 100% accurately assess the extent of the damages on a facility that is 30 stories below ground. Having said that, these munitions are designed for just such a target and they were delivered with precision.

#45 | Posted by BellRinger

How does Iran expelling the IAEA inspectors hinder or aid in Iran's attempt to build nuclear bombs?

Just a reminder that ------- took a $400 million dollar plane from the people who fund Hamas

Keep in mind too, that eventually with fetal personhood, this question will not apply to birth but conception.

The US will need to know exactly when and where you banged to determine if your child is a citizen or not.

Fourteenth Amendment
Section 1

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

So, a child born of undocumented parents is a citizen of CT, say.

14th says, unequivocally, "are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

So that child is a citizen of the United States

that child moves to GA, say, who follow -------- EO.

Is that child a citizen of the US or not?

The enforcement of the ban is not permitted nationwide

it is a literal -----------

Again

what this decision results in is different definitions of what a US citizen is. In some jurisdictions a state may decide a child of an undocumented immigrant is a citizen. In another jurisdiction a state may say a child of an undocumented immigrant is NOT a citizen

How does that play out?

Is that child subject to deportation if they cross a state line?

What about entitlements that person is eligible for?

What about voting rights? If that child moves to a -------- state, can they vote in presidential elections but not local elections?

What about marriages that child (upon reaching an age of consent) enters into?

Can that child seek federal elected office?

The damage this ruling can do to our country is incredible.

It's always funny when a guy with a GED tries to be a lawyer.
It's equally funny when they CHEERED for judges doing this during the Biden years.
MAGAts are such sad little cry babies.
Tell me if #51 is how you want things.

#69 | Posted by Sycophant

Very true, like when a court issued a nationwide stay on the use of mifepristone. (until saner brains caught up)

Boaz,
"Birthright citizenship was for slaves kids, not illegals"
The 14th Amendment made the freed slaves citizens, along with their children. Their children became citizens not because their parents were, but because they were born in the US and under its legal jurisdiction.
By contrast, children born abroad to US citizens get their citizenship through their parents and not their birthplace.
That distinction matters. The 14th Amendment wasn't written to give automatic citizenship to the children of people who crossed the border illegally and have no lawful status.
It was about correcting a historic injustice and not about handing out citizenship to anyone who happens to be born on US soil.
Somewhere along the line, that line got blurred and we've been misapplying it ever since.

#62 | Posted by BillJohnson at 20

Are you saying the author's of the 14th amendment were ignorant of it's meaning?

You are both stupid and evil.

an ugly combination.

the ghosts of the 1st Special Service Force (the Devil's Brigade) are shaking their heads in disgust at this dis on our honorable neighbors.

Another reason why this decision is incredibly, mind-boggling stupid.

The inevitable result will be a patchwork of jurisdictions with different definitions of citizenship.

So a child born to undocumented immigrants in CT say is a citizen, but if that child moves to GA, say, that child may no longer be a citizen

Can you magat scum understand the problems with this?

By teaching them federal law?

You're a sicko

You've read it correctly. Gays are not entitled to rights

Begs the question why didn't the authors state birthright citizenship only applied to former slaves?

Trump had issued an executive order that would deny citizenship to U.S.-born children of people who are in the country illegally
Jesus, that is common sense, why did we need a court case to decide that?

#4 | Posted by boaz at 2025-06-27 11:37 AM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Because the Democrats don't reproduce Boaz so they need to import their voters.

#5 | Posted by Bluewaffles

Christ you people are so ------- ignorant it is not funny

Like how do you put your pants on?

Gun grabbing is a clear violation of the Constitution.

#26 | Posted by BellRinger

so is birthright citizenship dumbass

It's about time someone told the democrats they lost. Democrats need to leave Trump alone and let him govern.
It's also not good that they are only about stopping Trump, who the American People elected, from carrying out his agenda, which the American People want.
#3 | Posted by boaz

So, when President AOC issues an Executive Order outlawing individual gun ownership, EVERY SINGLE GUN OWNER will now have to sue to have their gun rights restored

Moronic magat scum NEVER think things through.

Cause remember AOC will be elected to enact her agenda and you need to let her do it.

The Supreme Court sided with Maryland parents in a dispute over whether parents can keep their elementary school kids out of public school instruction they say violates their religious beliefs on gender and sexuality. The court's latest bolstering of religion in public life split the justices 6-3, with Republican appointees in the majority and Democratic appointees dissenting.

Why do Democrats want to LGBTQ our kids so bad?

#11 | POSTED BY BOAZ AT 2025-06-27 11:5

Why is it illegal to teach a federal law?