... A federal appeals court on Thursday temporarily paused a lower court's decision that had blocked most of President Trump's sweeping tariffs, granting an administrative stay while it considers the government's request for broader relief. ...

Dammit they didn't give me time to sell! How can I buy the dip if I haven't sold yet?!
TFW not on the 'advance notice' list...

A Member who constantly abuses the rules
#32 | Posted by Corky

Citation needed.

I guess that explains why the 21 million illegals came here.

#31 | Posted by snoofy

They are misfits at home and/or opportunists here for free stuff. They are human detritus from their homes, same as our original colonists. Criminals and fanatics, economic failures from debt prisons, etc.

Anyone that thinks Lewzer is not throwing this parade for himself is deluded. If he cared about the army, he wouldn't make them march in a stupid parade.

#26 | Posted by REDIAL
"Anyone that thinks Lewzer(President Trump) is not throwing this parade for himself is deluded." I disagree. He's "throwing this parade" for Us.
This is hardly the first US military parade. We had them before Trump, and we will have them after.
Parades are manipulative at heart; in the case of you guys (DR hoi polli), they amplify your native insurrective hostility.
You must now cope and seethe; you have no choice. See how that works?

#24 | Posted by Corky

I think it more likely that the hoi polloi of DR simply react to the outside world impinging on their bubble of mutual delusion. Their affectation to ban and cancel others' opinions is a coping mechanism against their helplessness in the world of opinion outside their narrow confines.
The screeching of "sock puppet" is parallel to Invasion of the Body Snatchers and I find it fascinating. Also their embrace of abuse, and their stalking behavior, which would rightly be viewed as reprehensible, is an interesting aside to the study of collective American Insanity.

Out of curiosity, do you think that Trump's psychiatric problems count for anything?

#21 | Posted by Zed

Out of curiosity, are you a psychiatrist? Not that I would respect your opinion any more or less if you were, but your post #20 ("Not in Trump's mind.") seems to suggest that you know what is in someone else's "mind", which is of course not possible. I think it more likely that he is acting upon external motive, like all the ruling class. You and I will never know the source of the motive, nor the content of another's mind.
That being said, America at large is an open-air asylum and everyone here labors under their own, inherited and freshly manufactured, psychological baggage. The world expelled their misfits, and the misfits inevitably ended up here (and in Australia). We fight constantly, and are easily manipulated. Others actually despise us, despite the false respect they use to manipulate us into fighting their wars and extract our wealth. Trump has done one good at least; he has demonstrated how fragile is the mask we are presented. I fully expect the rest of the world to destroy us eventually.

#22
Gonna protect you all, is he? The keyboard tough-guy?

btw he speaks not, my language. He spews abuse, his reward your slobber.

You one of them purebred Nazi racists
#66 | Posted by ClownShack

I am a typical strictly segregated American Mixed Breed. America is the most segregated country in the world, which is one of our greatest greatnesses. There's room for everybody, and we all know which parts of town to stay in (or out of).

are there actually non-racist Nazis?
#48 | Posted by danni

Hitler's allies were Japanese and negro (Mussolini)

US allies were all White Europeans
The US army and navy were strictly segregated

#18
Is this your all's bitter drunk uncle sitting in the corner that no one will talk to?

United States Army
Founded 14 June 1775
Country United States

Trump's Birthday
78 years
June 14, 1946

It's an ARMY anniversary parade, which simply happens to coincide with Trump's Birthday.

What do food stamps in Florida have to do with it? ("Alternate links:")

I'm going to cash in for the win, and buy the dip when tariffs are inevitably back on the menu.

The Trump administration has other authorities it can use to impose tariffs similar to those the court struck down:

The administration could quickly replace the 10% across-the-board tariff with a similar tariff of up to 15% under Sec. 122. Those tariffs would last for only up to 150 days, after which the law requires Congressional action to extend (the law is not clear on whether the period could end after 150 days and then quickly restart again). Sec. 122 authorizes the President to address a balance of payments deficit or to prevent an imminent and significant depreciation in the dollar, but it does not require any formal investigation or process, so the administration could theoretically replace the current 10% tariff with a Sec. 122-based tariff within days if deemed necessary.
The US Trade Representative could quickly launch Sec. 301 investigations on key trading partners, laying the procedural groundwork for tariffs after the investigation is complete. This would take longer, likely several weeks at a minimum and probably a few months to complete several investigations. There is no limit on the level or duration of tariffs under Sec. 301.
Sec. 232 tariffs, which President Trump has already used for steel, aluminum, and autos, could be broadened to cover other sectors. We already expect additional sectoral tariffs (pharmaceuticals, semiconductors/electronics, etc) and uncertainty regarding the IEEPA-based tariffs could lead the White House to put more emphasis on sectoral tariffs, where there is much less legal uncertainty. President Trump has not emphasized sectoral tariffs as frequently lately as he did earlier this year, but if the White House finds it has less flexibility on country-focused tariffs, sectoral tariffs might receive more attention again.
Sec. 338 of the Trade Act of 1930 allows the President to impose tariffs of up to 50% on imports from countries that discriminate against the US. This authority, which has never been used, is similar to the authority under Sec. 301, except that it limits the amount of the tariffs but does not require a formal investigation.

Presidential Safeguard Action on Tires from China: In September 2009, President Obama directed the imposition for three years of additional tariffs to stop a harmful surge of imports of Chinese tires for passenger cars and light trucks. The surge caused production of U.S. tires to drop, domestic tire plants to close, and Americans to lose their jobs. Acting on behalf of American manufacturers and workers, President Obama invoked a law that had never before been used to give the United States the right under WTO rules to address harm caused by imports from China. USTR successfully defended China's WTO challenge to the President's action, resulting in WTO findings that rejected China's challenge in its entirety.

And you didn't cite s**t, original source of otherwise. You simply posted a random paragraph from who know where.

#89 | Posted by et_al, esq. / spokesman for First Attorney Group Ltd.

I went back and got a corroborating source, and included it's credentials, just for you-
Here, let me repeat it, again just for you-

Crown Land | The Canadian Encyclopedia
89%
About 89% of Canada is designated as either federally or provincially managed crown land, though it may be rented out or sold. However, different provinces and territories have vastly differing proportions of crown land.Nov 14, 2024
Crown Land | The Canadian Encyclopedia
The Canadian Encyclopedia
www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca article crow...

Gee it looks legit. But I'm not a semi-literate self-alleged 'lawyer' doin' it for free, so I and The Canadian Encyclopedia may still be wrong. Add a couple more insults to bolster you're case, maybe that will help.

#86 | Posted by et_al esq./ JD,DEI,ESL

I think you may be confusing intimate transitive verb: to communicate delicately and indirectly -with imply and are furthermore confusing each of these with infer, which is what you did in reaction to a citation snipped directly from an official source document.

You also seem confused re: your vs you're (ref #70)

I hope this helps

#83 | Posted by snoofy

"Land ownership for everybody" is not free, but it is freedom.

What date is Black Bike Week in Myrtle Beach?
When are the 2025 bike weeks around Myrtle Beach, SC ...
6 days ago
Atlantic Beach Memorial Day Black Pearl Cultural Heritage and Bike Festival. Frequently referred to as Black Bike Week, The Atlantic Beach Memorial Day Black Pearl Cultural Heritage and Bike Festival returns every May for Memorial Day weekend. In 2025, the festival will run from Friday, May 23 to Monday, May 26.6 days ago

#72 | Posted by LampLighter

quote facts = disrupt

Nice echo chamber you got here, be a shame if anything happened to it.

you're (sic) quoted paragraph.
#70 | Posted by et_al

semi-literate lawyer doin' it for free...

Land ownership for everybody, taxes notwithstanding, is the qualitative difference between US and Everybody Else.

#67

I googled you're quoted paragraph. You are FOS. www.google.com

#70 | Posted by et_al at 2025-05-27 11:34 PM | Reply | Flag:

How you figger? What's incorrect? 89% vs 90%?

Does King Charles own 90% of Canada?
Charles III or any British monarch after him, "owns" around 90% of Canadian land. 90% of the land is considered "Crown land" which the land belongs to whoever holds the British crown. Though, the monarch owns this land in name only as the Canadian gouvernment holds it as private land.Mar 18, 2025

Nice "freedom" you got there. Be a shame if anything happened to it.