Presidential Safeguard Action on Tires from China: In September 2009, President Obama directed the imposition for three years of additional tariffs to stop a harmful surge of imports of Chinese tires for passenger cars and light trucks. The surge caused production of U.S. tires to drop, domestic tire plants to close, and Americans to lose their jobs. Acting on behalf of American manufacturers and workers, President Obama invoked a law that had never before been used to give the United States the right under WTO rules to address harm caused by imports from China. USTR successfully defended China's WTO challenge to the President's action, resulting in WTO findings that rejected China's challenge in its entirety.

The Trump administration has other authorities it can use to impose tariffs similar to those the court struck down:

The administration could quickly replace the 10% across-the-board tariff with a similar tariff of up to 15% under Sec. 122. Those tariffs would last for only up to 150 days, after which the law requires Congressional action to extend (the law is not clear on whether the period could end after 150 days and then quickly restart again). Sec. 122 authorizes the President to address a balance of payments deficit or to prevent an imminent and significant depreciation in the dollar, but it does not require any formal investigation or process, so the administration could theoretically replace the current 10% tariff with a Sec. 122-based tariff within days if deemed necessary.
The US Trade Representative could quickly launch Sec. 301 investigations on key trading partners, laying the procedural groundwork for tariffs after the investigation is complete. This would take longer, likely several weeks at a minimum and probably a few months to complete several investigations. There is no limit on the level or duration of tariffs under Sec. 301.
Sec. 232 tariffs, which President Trump has already used for steel, aluminum, and autos, could be broadened to cover other sectors. We already expect additional sectoral tariffs (pharmaceuticals, semiconductors/electronics, etc) and uncertainty regarding the IEEPA-based tariffs could lead the White House to put more emphasis on sectoral tariffs, where there is much less legal uncertainty. President Trump has not emphasized sectoral tariffs as frequently lately as he did earlier this year, but if the White House finds it has less flexibility on country-focused tariffs, sectoral tariffs might receive more attention again.
Sec. 338 of the Trade Act of 1930 allows the President to impose tariffs of up to 50% on imports from countries that discriminate against the US. This authority, which has never been used, is similar to the authority under Sec. 301, except that it limits the amount of the tariffs but does not require a formal investigation.

I'm going to cash in for the win, and buy the dip when tariffs are inevitably back on the menu.

are there actually non-racist Nazis?
#48 | Posted by danni

Hitler's allies were Japanese and negro (Mussolini)

US allies were all White Europeans
The US army and navy were strictly segregated

You one of them purebred Nazi racists
#66 | Posted by ClownShack

I am a typical strictly segregated American Mixed Breed. America is the most segregated country in the world, which is one of our greatest greatnesses. There's room for everybody, and we all know which parts of town to stay in (or out of).

... A federal appeals court on Thursday temporarily paused a lower court's decision that had blocked most of President Trump's sweeping tariffs, granting an administrative stay while it considers the government's request for broader relief. ...

Dammit they didn't give me time to sell! How can I buy the dip if I haven't sold yet?!
TFW not on the 'advance notice' list...

Out of 143 executive orders 120 have been challenged in the courts as illegal or unconstitutional.
#77 | Posted by donnerboy

Yeah these whackos challenge anything, it doesn't matter. Wake me up when any of the challenges hold up in a higher court.