He states that he "never in his life" thought that a month later, "a comedian would appear to criticize and talk badly about my [Puerto Rico]," he said. "That's why I'm renouncing my support for Donald Trump and stepping away from any political conversation. Puerto Rico deserves respect." read more
Donald Trump's health has been called into question once again after a video of him "dragging that right leg" went viral on social media. read more
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told supporters Monday that Donald Trump has promised to give him "control" of several public health agencies, including the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Agriculture, if he wins a second term in November. Kennedy said, "The key that I think I'm -- you know, that President Trump has promised me is -- is control of the public health agencies, which are HHS and its sub-agencies, CDC, FDA, NIH and a few others, and then also the USDA, which is -- which, you know, is key to making America healthy." read more
Hundreds of election ballots were destroyed early Monday morning after a ballot box caught fire in the Washington state city of Vancouver, Clark County Elections Auditor Greg Kimsey confirmed to Forbes on Monday -- the second incident of its kind in the area. read more
McCartney posed as a teenage girl on social media to befriend young girls globally, procure illicit images from them, and then blackmail them ... read more
Censored FINALLY found the right answer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
#86 | Posted by truthhurts
Thank you. Please, you're too kind.
No applause, just venmo money (MattGaetzIsNotAPedo@pedosRUs.com)
But of course, those naive European Greens are ignoring the fact that Jill Stein wants Trump to win, just like in 2016 (and Nader wanted Dubbya to win in 2000).
Jill Stein: How and Why I Will Stop Kamala Harris Winning the White House
drudge.com
Where is the criminal penalty spelled out?
#66 | Posted by eberly
Are you unable to run an Internet search?
CHAPTER 170A. PERFORMANCE OF ABORTION
Sec. 170A.004. CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
(a) A person who violates Section 170A.002 commits an offense.
(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the second degree, except that the offense is a felony of the first degree if an unborn child dies as a result of the offense.
Added by Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., Ch. 800 (H.B. 1280), Sec. 2, eff. August 25, 2022.
statutes.capitol.texas.gov
Profit remains death to those unworthy with complications.
Parasite capitalism.
#55 | Posted by redlightrobot
What? That is completely the wrong take on this.
She wasn't turned away because of her lack of money. She was refused care because no one wants to go to jail for doing their job. They also don't want to risk fighting a criminal case, even if they are found not guilty. And they also don't want to deal with a civil trial.
Texas abortion ban turns citizens into "bounty hunters"
The Texas law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy includes an unusual measure designed to ensure the law is enforced: Residents of the state can sue clinics, doctors, nurses and even people who drive a woman to get the procedure, for at least $10,000.
www.cbsnews.com
You think the Supreme Court is going to reverse their position that it is up to the states?
Why not? If they can undo 50 years of Roe.
And even if they did, some states have already written the right to an abortion into their state constitutions.
Do you seriously not understand that Federal law generally takes precedence over state law?
According to the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, clause 2) of the United States ConstitutionI don't think it would be possible to create a nationwide ban on abortion unless it were carried out through an amendment to the constitution. Which is not gonna happen.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the Supreme law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
As the Supreme Court stated in Altria Group v. Good, 555 U.S. 70 (2008), a federal law that conflicts with a state law will overtake, or "preempt", that state law:
Consistent with that command, we have long recognized that state laws that conflict with federal law are "without effect". Maryland v. Louisiana, 451 U. S. 725, 746 (1981)
Although many concurrent powers are subject to federal preemption, some are usually not, such as the power to tax private citizens.
Federal Preemption en.wikipedia.org
#24 | Posted by madbomber
It's possible if SCOTUS says it's possible. You should know that by now.
States could still ban abortion.
Not if SCOTUS says there is a fundamental right to privacy (abortion), which is exactly what Roe said.
The 21st amendment legalized the production and sale of alcohol, but there are still dry counties in some parts of the US (that I would never visit).
Do you know why?
#94 | Posted by madbomber
Because the 21st Amendment expressly allows that to happen.
Listen, princess. I get it. You think your pet causes are so important-so tantamount-that they should be law based solely on your beliefs.
#93 | Posted by madbomber
This isn't about my feelings. This is about you make an incorrect statement that Trump's presidency (past and future) "will have no bearing on these laws."
His presidency very much had every bearing on Texas's law becoming enforceable. And his future presidency will also have an impact.
I'm really not sure why you're being obtuse about this, intentionally so, it would appear.