"In a statement, Talarico spokesperson JT Ennis said the campaign "has no control over contributions to any super PAC," noting that federal law bars political campaigns from coordinating with outside entities.

"The only way to get Big Money out of our politics is to reject politicians like Ken Paxton who want corporations and billionaires to decide our elections, not Texans," Ennis said.

"While Ken Paxton works to enrich himself and his donors, James will remain the only candidate in this race fighting to ban super PACs, ban corporate PACs, ban congressional stock trading, and tax billionaires so we can fix this broken, corrupt political system."

"I found him abrasive, condescending, and intentionally noncommittal to survivors " a marked contrast to his public testimony during his confirmation hearing," Farmer said.

"While quick to point to the failures of previous administrations, he refused to take accountability for mistakes made under his own leadership."

more at the link

"Israel's nature and parks authority said the proposal was not possible because wild animals may only be held for educational and research purposes.

"We need to protect them, not have them protect us. That is not the spirit of the law," officials said.

But by classifying the Nile crocodile as a "tended wild animal", the reptiles will be allowed to be kept on prison grounds, subject to animal welfare requirements."

;;

The cruelty is indeed the point.

oops! I read that as, "Chinese hookers" and thougth it must be about 1Nut.

lfthndturds has been denying the fraud in the WH for years now.

Apperently he loves being scammed.

Also apparently he loves pretending that single incidents must mean massive fraud on the part of certain peoples.

But then, he's a well-established moron... not to defame morons or anything.

Apparently they can't get more ignorant fast enough.

- that you listen to

The obtusity is ENORMOUS!

No, White Boaz, that's the percent of most climate scientist experts, not a select few.

- the climate $cientists you listen to are wrong.

Only 1Nut could compete in obtusity with this clownshow.

"Scientific consensus identifying humans as primarily responsible for climate change is not new and was already forming in the 1980s.

Today, 97 percent to 99.9 percent of climate scientists agree that climate change is happening and that human activity is the primary cause."

#20

Ah, if only we mere mortals could be so above it all.

Truly, you are magnificent!

#11

The Comedy is deep with this one.

Not to mention the psychological problems, so I won't mention them.

99 percent of Climate Scientists are wrong, and lfthndturds is right?

Delusion is the Trumper's best friend.

"Trump's Election Speech Ignites Wave of Furious Democratic Backlash " and Calls for Impeachment"

- No one made them come here and ask for

Someone apparently missed decades of planned US Corporate dominace and subjegation and bribery of the governments in their countries.

And the more recent climate change that killed their crops and animals and jobs.

Someone who would just as soon mow them down with artillary at the Border.

Big mistake on his part by not just joining ICE.

lfthndthrds is still looking for Reagan's Black Welfare Queens driving Cadillacs.

Who turned out to be mostly white women with children on welfare.

Make America a Third World Country Again!

We deserve to be mocked for putting this criminal in Office.

- Israel, Russia and China should be America's top adversaries, in that order.

Good point. They would be replacing this Gov's current top adversaries, Greenland, Cuba, and the American People.

As DJT obviously knew and encouraged Vlad to interfere for him, it was par for his course to then accuse Dems and China of what he himself was doing.

He may have been practicing for his ICE interview... gaining experience and sharpening up that Resume.

"CBS News is fact-checking President Trump's speech on election security Thursday night, in which he raised new allegations regarding China's access to U.S. voter data and claimed that the "deep state" in the U.S. intelligence community sought to "actively suppress and downplay" China's actions.

He also made accusations about voter registration fraud in the U.S.

Here are some of the claims and CBS News' ratings and context for Mr. Trump's statements:"
more

"No credible intelligence has emerged showing that the vote count in 2020 was manipulated by foreign actors.

Repeated audits and reviews -- manyrun by Republicans, including Trump's own then-attorney general -- have found no significant fraud occurred in 2020.

He did not raise doubts about his election wins in 2016 or 2024."

- its always "no relevance", "no major affect" ... why does this matter?

In 20 years, perhaps the most assinine assertion ever posited here.

Amazing, really.

"No public evidence exists showing that China rigged or altered vote tallies in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. During a prime-time national address on July 16, 2026, President Donald Trump revisited his long-standing claims about the 2020 election.

He announced the declassification of intelligence reports alleging that China accessed 220 million U.S. voter records and engaged in a broad influence campaign against him. (Wall Street Journal)

However, U.S. intelligence agencies, cybersecurity experts, and independent reviews provide consistent information on several key points:

No Vote Tallies Were Altered: Independent assessments confirm that neither China nor any other foreign entity modified ballots, manipulated voting infrastructure, or altered final vote counts.

Data Access Does Not Equal Rigging: While declassified intelligence suggests Chinese intelligence analyzed or accessed public or semi-private U.S. voter registration logs for public opinion analysis, cybersecurity experts clarify that accessing voter records does not give an adversary the ability to manipulate actual vote tallies. (CBS NEWS)

Distinction Between Influence and Technical Interference:

Intelligence officials draw a clear line between influence operations"such as public messaging or social media disinformation campaigns"and technical interference.

While there was a minor dissenting view within the intelligence community that China utilized social media to denigrate Trump's campaign, all agencies agree that no technical infrastructure or tabulation was compromised. (The New York Times)

According to reports from CBS News and The Wall Street Journal, the newly declassified material highlights China's ongoing cyber capabilities and intent to monitor U.S. politics, but it does not support claims that the election outcome was fraudulent or rigged." (CBS NEWS)

- when new evidence is ascertained.
#12 | Posted by oneironaut

There is no relevent new evidence that China worked against him in that Election.

You are merely simping and pimping for they Cult you pretend not to belong to.

Worse, you only belong to it because it's your only way to strike out at liberals and progressives who dare to disagree with your asinine, fallacy-filled assertions about... well, about everything.

Truly pathetic.

'speech' and I use the term loosely, video:

- like Biden did.

From the World's Most Dependable Source of Logically Fallacies; the Whataboutism.

Not an argument at all, but a charge of supposed hypocracy by or for someone else.

So, a waste of space.