No worries!!

President Trump "stands strongly" behind him.

Because that's the safest place to fire someone from.

Even better if you can do it on CNN on a big screen behind them while they giving a speech to respected colleagues thousands of miles from home.

And the coup de grace is canceling their government credit cards so they have to walk home.

Now that is the Way.

The MAGA Way.

"How much due process is required to see if they have a valid visa? Takes 5 minutes tops."

So if it only takes 5 minutes to follow the law why didn't they take 5 minutes to follow the law?

Why? Because that is obviously still too complicated for Trumpy and the maga maroons.

Also that would make it look like they are subject to the law. And that's a bad look for dictators.

And Trumpy thinks he is above it all. Laws are for little people and the hoi polloi and the "peasants". Not for the Dear Leader and the wealthy oligarchs.

lol. Oopsie!

Sorry Latino Christians.

You voted for a Caesar.

Now you must Render unto that Caesar.

"Invoke the Insurrection Act and round up all the Democrats, their liberal judges.. blah blah blah."

I say let's do it. Come and get me.

I am already tired of watching you maga maroons slow walking this country into a dictatorship anyway. My federal tax return is in my account and I am armed and ready to make a stand now.

Let's start the damn Purge.

Let's get down with the sickness and get it out of our system.

The tree of Liberty is thirsty.

Sic Semper Tyrannis.

Semper Fi

Yup ... "it is now or never for the Supreme Court to decide if we are a nation of laws, or a nation run by a lawless bully."

Don't go trying to spread your ------- Canuck values to Americans.

#14 | POSTED BY SCOTTS

Don't worry your little two sizes too small blackened heart about it.

Being as how Trumpy is threatening to invade and/or annex them I am pretty sure Canadians want nothing to do with us right now.

It seems to me if one president can let millions in with minimal vetting it should be just as easy to remove those same individuals.

Every president since the 60s has let "millions in with minimum vetting".

And no it's not as easy to get them all out once they are in. Some yes. Many no.

Not if you follow the law as written.

Maybe it's a more complex issue than your little maga brain can comprehend?

Perhaps Trumpy should not have tanked the bipartisan immigration bill Congress was attempting to pass to help reform our nations immigration laws.

Since the outbreak is very recent my guess is some people who were infectious came into the country very recently.

#9 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

So.. by your theory then Trumpy is currently "dragging" unvetted infectious diseases into our country?

Lock him up!

"This is what happens when over 10 million people are dragged in with minimal vetting over the course of 4 years."

The U.S. government does not publish data on the net number of migrants who enter illegally and remain in the country.

But it is estimated that there are only 10-11 million undocumented immigrants in this country total.

So you are say Biden "dragged" them all into America in just four years?

Since you cannot do math you just lie.

GFY liar.

Hey, idiot, China ain't an enemy either. We currently have no legal enemies.

Someone should tell Trumpy.

Apparently we are at war with a shadow government of gangsters operating in El Salvador right under the nose of the "coolest dictator". A dictator that is so weak that he apparently can't tell his own prison guards what to do.

Else how could Trumpy use the "alien enemies act of 1798" to try and justify kidnapping people off the streets of America (without due process) if we have no "legal enemies"?

Congress must agree with Trumpy as they are not lifting a finger to stop him.

Re 13

No. Obviously.

Hard to hold someone in contempt who has not defied the courts orders.

"But I'll give James the benefit of the doubt"

No. No you won't. You have already convicted her.

At this rate she will be lucky just get her "due process" up before being deported To El Salvador as a "homegrown terrorist".

...

This is becoming a trend.

#8 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Revenge and retribution?

Yup. It's the latest maga fad. And it's not a great look.

Good luck with that. Midterms are coming.

Because of it the state is close to being bankrupt.

#20 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

Running a deficit does not imply potential bankruptcy.

In bad years California has run a deficit in the tens of billions of dollars. And yet this year our budget is roughly balanced.

And States cannot even declare bankruptcy anyway.

The U.S. Bankruptcy Code does not include provisions for state bankruptcy filings.

Enjoy living under the bridge in a van dumbass.

He can always apply for welfare or Social Security.

Too bad there is no one there to process his claim.

Probably should throw him in Gitmo while it is determined whether his actions rise to this crime.

#6 | POSTED BY SCOTTS

So to cover up for violating a persons constitutional rights you want to violate the constitution even further?

Brilliant!

That's so maga of you.

I'm sure the candidate behind that will do well at the polls.

#39 | POSTED BY KWRX25

It's gonna be great fun watching the Mad King floundering and bumbling about when republicans lose control of the House in the mid terms.

And your maga tears will be so delicious.

using the courts to force an anti-constitutional agenda?
#15 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Yeah Trumpy and his weaponized DOJ should definitely stop doing that.

The courts still decide what is constitutional and what is not. Trumpy is obviously not capable of interpreting the law and it's not even his job.

So, my next question would be, is there anyone who doesn't have a legal right to reside in the US?

#46 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

So my question would be ... Who gets to decide what your legal rights are? The president or a court of law?

You really want a convicted felon and twice impeached wannabe dictator interpreting the law for you?

Is that not what getting your "due process" is all about? Determining your legal status?

Once it is legally determined or adjudicated that you are not here legally THEN the President gets to toss them .. ie faithfully enforce the law.

There is nothing in the constitution that allows for a President to "gleefully" and corruptly ignore or reinterpret the law.

While that attempt was blocked, it happened to be using one of the new DOGE accounts and had the correct name and password.

Looks like they gave the username and password to a Russian.

But they forgot to change the firewall settings to allow remote access from outside the firewall.

An easy fix. Next time you won't even know!

Anyway.. just MORE evidence of their incompetence.

They can't even do evil competently.

Thanks to her for at least speaking up.

#1 | POSTED BY CORKY

Finally?

A day late and an impeachment vote short.

Has he checked with his "accountability buddy" to make sure it's approved by God?

Maybe he oughta talk directly to Jesus and see what He thinks about gutting healthcare for the poor and disadvantaged.

Please don't make Jesus weep again.

"Due process is I am not a citizen and have no constitutional right to be here."

Again. This is NOT Germany.

Due process has specific definition with regards to the U.S. constitution.

And that ain't it.

In the context of U.S. Constitutional law, due process guarantees that legal matters are resolved according to established rules and principles, ensuring fairness and preventing arbitrary government action. It's a safeguard against government overreach, protecting fundamental rights to life, liberty, and property. Due process is enshrined in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, applying to both civil and criminal matters.

"And that applies to every human on earth"

My quote was directly from the U.S. constitution.

Which amendment in the U.S. constitution is that quoted from?

"Policies for non-citizens in the US is just that. Policy."

BS.

Read the damn constitution or maybe STFU about things you don't understand.

no person shall "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law".

How much clearer does it need to be for you people?

So unless you are redefining immigrants as nonpersons you should probably just stop with this line of obviously maga inspired nonsense.

I know that living here in Germany, if I annoy them, they have every right to kick me out.

#32 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

That's why we don't have to speak German in America dummy.

America is not Germany. They have their own constitution. I haven't read it. Are all "persons" guaranteed due process there?

Like the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment includes a due process clause stating that no person shall "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law".

And it's not about "offering residency".

I pretty sure that after this man is brought back and gets his "due process" he will be immediately deported again.

Unless it is held up in the courts for 4 years which is entirely possible.