"Greatest Show On Earth."

Good to know this is all fun and games for you. As opposed to something serious.

It's always just fun and games until somebody gets hurt. We told ya not to FAFO. Now you got the kids running around naked and blasting helicopters with lasers. Nice werk!

"Nope. Heading to the No Kings march in 15 minutes.
Gotta get my exercise."

Gonna do some head stomping, eh?

#33 | POSTED BY SENTINEL

lol

Actually that was my tai chi at the beach alarm.

The No Kings March is on Saturday.

I may go dressed as Kermit the Frog. So it will be "some head hopping" I guess. Hopefully chickenman will be there. He's the real dangerous one you know. He's our hero of the day. He will be doing the hen pecking.

We're at war with Venezuela.

#1 | POSTED BY ZED

That is not rightthink!

We are not at "war". We are having a "non-international armed conflict".

Now that's some double plus good thunking.

Are you having fun?

#16 | POSTED BY SENTINEL

Greatest Show On Earth.

Gotta really thank you maga maroons for such a great send off party for my final Golden Years.

And here I thought it was just gonna be a lot of boring sitting around drinking my PBR (Pabst Blue Ribbon) and talking about the weather.

Nope. Heading to the No Kings march in 15 minutes.

Gotta get my exercise.

Time to weaponized the IRS and the DOJ! (again)

-Vistard

Meaning he will ignore it after the government is reopened.
#3 | POSTED BY NIXON

Whenever republicans make promises (especially like this one) it always reminds of Lucy promising Charlie Brown that THIS TIME she will not pull away the football at the very last second.

Arresting an ice agent for assault would be a Turning Point in America.

Gonna need more popcorn if they do.

That will definitely be an exciting day.

I bet I know how Trumpy will respond.

He will then try and arrest the local police for "interfering with federal immigration enforcement activities".

Won't that be fun?

Oh yeah. We gonna have sum fun then!

Destruction of private property.

Assault.

False arrest.

And Republicans will get 100% of the blame.

#14 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT

There is merit to your proposal.

But if Dems do not take the House in the mid terms none of it will matter.

America will be toast. We will be on a runaway train with no brakes and with Mr Toad at the wheel.

Really? It's a currency swap.

#24 | POSTED BY VISITOR_

A currency swap is a risky financial investment and we could lose billions depending on what happens in Argentina.

So Trumpy would rather make a risky financial investment in Argentina than California, New York and Oregon and even North Carolina.

Got it.

Donner would rather these funds sit unused when they could pay service men and women.

#21 | POSTED BY VISITOR_ AT 2025-10-14 03:07 PM | FLAG:

Visitor would rather pretend a government shutdown harms no one.

Donner would rather the President faithfully enforce the law.

Donner world rather the President allow Congress to negotiate an end to the shut down.

Donner would also rather the President stop sowing fear and chaos and threatening innocent Americans by threatening to illegally withhold their back pay.

You want more "Christianity" in the MAGA movement so long as YOU get to pick and choose what aspects of Christianity.
#23 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

No. We just want more Jesus in your Christianity instead of you Christians cherry picking quotes from Leviticus to get around and avoid following Jesus's actual Teachings.

The No Kings march starts at 12 locally. Check your local listings.

MAGAts say un huh! (It's their best argument next to "it's not about who's right, it's about who's winning!)

Them ICEholes say they are only arresting hardened criminals!

Now who are you going to believe? The Trumptilians or your own lying eyes?

It's considered PARTISAN to reject maga delusions and lies now.

#19 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

Actually it's considered terrorism now.

"The left would be better served by engaging in some more even keeled discussion."

Kinda hard to do when all the Republicans have left Washington and refuse to negotiate.

You've been asked about 5 times to provide proof of this, but you can't. You're a liar. And a hypocrite.

#9 | POSTED BY SENTINEL

He is referring to the story about a social media post by Bari Weiss that allegedly incited a wave of death threats that allegedly preceded the killing of Palestinian writer and academic Refaat Alareer by an Israeli airstrike.

On December 6, 2023, Alareer was killed by an Israeli "surgical" airstrike in Gaza. His sister and four of her children were also killed in the attack.

Interestingly Alareer supposedly said that if he was to be killed it would be because of Bari Weiss. Then he WAS killed.

So he is not lying. It's just you are too lazy to find out for yourself if the story is real before accusing him of lying. He was not lying. It's a real story.

What does that make you?

He called them fascists and garbage.

#49 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Biden was just speaking truth as he saw it.

Did the mean old man hurt your feeling?

Only two dolls per customer! Don't get greedy. You bastages don't need 30 dolls.

But no worries. These tariffs will cost Americans "nothing"!

And nothing is what you'll get!

Trumpy done promised!!

You'll have to point out the section of the constitution that says excess funds sitting unused in one account can't be transfered to another account to pay the military during a Schumer Shut-down.

#19 | POSTED BY VISITOR

It is unconstitutional for the President to use money appropriated by Congress for one purpose for a different purpose because it violates the constitutional separation of powers, specifically Congress's "power of the purse". The Constitution gives Congress the exclusive authority to control federal spending, and the President is required to faithfully execute the laws as written, not rewrite them by reallocating funds.

The Appropriations Clause (Article I, Section 9): The U.S. Constitution is explicit about how money is to be spent: "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law". This clause establishes that Congress must first pass legislation to approve and specify how federal money is spent. The President cannot access or spend public money without this authorization.

Thank you for the opportunity to teach you about our wonderful constitution. It's very cool. You should read it sometime!

I bet you argued like DonorBot that a higher corporate tax wouldn't be passed on to the consumer.

I bet you just made that crap up.

And I think. Obviously.

And what I obviously think is that you and Trumpy are both sick demented iceholes.

But do carry on with the Lie of the Day.

Gonna be even tougher when the paychecks stop flowing.

We gonna Find Out then who the WEAK are!

But that's what a FAFO is for.

Right?

Neither is MAGA.

#164 | POSTED BY VISITOR

Their man is literally in the White House. They literally control the levers of government. Which now that I think about is literally no longer very organized either.

But no worries! The future's literally so bright helicopter pilots now MUST literally wear shades!

Welcome to a MAGA free thread.

Interesting yes?

If we could distill the essence of this thread and put it in our water supplies maybe we could finally rid us all of this irksome plague of maga loonies.

So before republicans will negotiate with democrats the democrats must give up whatever leverage they have, forget who they are and what they want to negotiate about first. Then they will negotiate.

Sure! And this makes some kind of sense to a maga maroon?