"Your claim that Iran was negotiating in good faith isn't something either of us can really prove or disprove."

However, I CAN prove America was not negotiating in good faith.

It's on CNN the BBC and Sky News every night now. Will be forever now apparently.

Democrats are playing the redistricting game too.

#190 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

A day late and a dollar short but the Democrats finally woke up to the impending dangers of tyranny and realized they had to fight fire with fire.

Democracy may stand a chance yet. In spite of fools like you.

Headline fail!

It's not a War!

Trumpy said so.

Nothing bad will happen.

It can only good happen.

Trumpy said so!

Re 8

Looks like you need to add $200 billion.

Whisky Pete needs $200 billion more for the War that is not a War.

Trump argued at a Pennsylvania rally that Harris would get the U.S. into a "World War 3 guaranteed" because she is "too grossly incompetent to do the job".

He alleged that her presidency would lead to a situation where "sons and daughters will end up getting drafted to go fight for a war in a country that you've never heard of".

In a "Truth Social" post, Trump claimed, "There will be no future under Comrade Kamala Harris, because she will take us into a Nuclear World War III!".

So buckle up buttercups.

Nuclear World War III is next up. Apparently, in Trumpy's Dr Demento playbook.

Just remember..

Nothing bad could happen.

It can only good happen!

Let Trump ban mail-in ballots except for the exceptions.
#182 | Posted by BillJohnson

I would not let Trumpy tie my shoes. I would not let Trumpy near my kids. I would not let Trumpy near my wife. I would not trust Trumpy with my life.

I certainly would not let Trumpy tamper with the elections. Especially just before a major election.

Your continued acceptances of Trumpy's corrupt and criminal behavior as normal and trustworthy is just plain creepy. It's like watching a woman who falls in love with Freddy Kruger. Because he's so manly!

The voters clearly saw it differently.

#66 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

The voters fell for Trumpy's firehose of lies.

So the voters chose to FAFO.

But but he didn't say supported the assault on Rand Paul by his neighbor.

He said he understood it!

Dude sounds just like our Dingaling!

So...there are exceptions...

#79 | POSTED BY PETROUS

There is an exception to every rule. If you look hard enough.

A positive side effect of slavery was better black athletes. (And the roots of great music!)

On January 15, 1988 (Martin Luther King Jr. Day weekend), in an interview at a Washington D.C. restaurant, Jimmy "the Greek" Snyder said the quiet part out loud:

"The black is a better athlete to begin with because he's been bred to be that way... During the slave trade, the slave owner would breed his big black to his big woman so that he could have a big black kid".

Democrats should refuse to cooperate with this corrupt administration in any and every way possible.

Time to stop playing footsie with facists.

You know the republicans have and will continue their scorched earth strategy even after they lose power in the upcoming mid terms.

I'm not easily influenced.

#155 | Posted by BillJohnson

Most illogical and unreasonable and mentally unstable people I have come across. are not easily influenced to stop being illogical unreasonable and just plain crazy people.

Oh noes, my solar excess is profitable again.

POSTED BY SITZKRIEG

Sounds like this is exactly what you voted for!

Gratz. Enjoying the Great American FAFO are ya?

"I said he paid a lot of "taxes", nimrod."

Oh? You know how much taxes he paid?

How much is a lot?

"Nimrod"?

That's your chosen kindergarten insult of the day?

The Bible states that he (Nimrod) was "a mighty hunter before the L [and] ... began to be mighty in the earth".[2] Nimrod became a symbol of defiance against God.

The MarineTraffic app.

Don't bother Dad right now.

He's watching boats.

Re #19

"You could country on one hand."

You could count them on one hand.

Ditto to many of the partisans on the left here who only exist react to "the other side".

#14 | POSTED BY SENTINEL

Very few people ONLY exist to react to the "other side". You could country on one hand.

What most are reacting to is the constant lies, the ridiculous nonsense and the disinformation and the wierd unAmerican attempts to normalize this fascist hateful administration and it's plethora of lies.

Re #5 | POSTED BY ET_AL

Yet some are still in the dark (Ages).

We'll see.. more White Christian Nationalism and attempts to force an American Theocracy for at least 2 more years.

We will continue with the Great FAFO until then.

"Originalism is a lie and even if it weren't, is an inherently unjust way to govern."

Exactly. Unjust and stupid. And not the way the constitution was designed to be. Which is obviously why article V was included.

Originally. Article V was designed to ensure that the Constitution could be updated to meet changing times, but with a high threshold to ensure stability and widespread consensus.

Limitations: No amendment prior to 1808 could affect the first and fourth clauses of Section 9, Article I (regarding the slave trade and direct taxes).

So after 1808 no other limits on what could be changed.

According to the Original Constitution.

"You describe any OPINION you disagree with as a lie."

Opinions are like a holes. Everyone has one. Yours stink for sure.

I could care less about your stinky opinions.

But I vociferously disagree with your "facts".

And you hurl insults like a drunken sailor.

So expect to get some back.

Dingaling conveniently ignores the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments which are often viewed as a "second founding" that CORRECTED the original 1787 document's betrayal of liberty by accepting slavery. The 13th Amendment (1865) abolished slavery, the 14th (1868) granted citizenship and equal protection, and the 15th (1870) prohibited voting discrimination.

These were changes to the original constitution. The changes were authorized by the constitution.. As designed.

The constitution was designed to be adjusted according to conditions on the ground.

The framers of the Constitution realized that change and reform would be necessary over time, and in Article V they spelled out several processes for amending this core document of the republic.

"It was an appropriate response to your BS. Don't like it? Don't lead with a childish insult."

When you lie like a rug and get constantly corrected yet continue to lie like a rug.. Expect insults.

Cruelty is the point in a policy based on Revenge and Retribution.

The top spot belongs to you.

#45 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

I know you are but what am I? It takes one to know one!

Such well founded and reasoned arguments!

For a kindergartner.

"Your hyper partisanship knows no bounds."

Says the most hyper partisan lying hypocrite on this site.

Unintentional funny flag!

Now that the court has a majority that takes an originalism approach to jurisprudence the left has to try and destroy the entire institution.

#17 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Some would argue the majority is not taking an "originalist approach" at all but is actually practicing "common law constitutionalism", using a mix of history, structure, and their own conceptions of the "common good" rather than a strict adherence to 18th-century original meaning.

Even some fellow judges argue that the Court uses history as a "veneer" for subjective value judgments. This is often called "law office history," where justices select historical facts that support a desired outcome while ignoring conflicting evidence.

You are not fooling anyone with your agitprop and lies but you.

The dow is down by 3,50O points for the month. The S&P is crashing and Americans' retirement accounts are shrinking!!

Thats what we should be talking about!!

Flash from the Past:

Pam Blondi- "The Dow is over 50,000 right now. The S&P 500 is also up and the Nasdaq is smashing records, while Americans' retirement accounts are booming. That's what we should be talking about"