Taylor ordered the pilot to take him out of the country, but was then shot in the chest by another passenger,

-they carry guns on da plane?!

#1 | Posted by abortedmonson

-Oh yeah, a stereotypical Trumper for sure for sure
eyeroll.gif

yet another tds moron detected.

"Facilitate?"

I mean, really ...

#12 | Posted by LampLighter

-Well, he's a foreign citizen in his home country. What would you have happen? Black ops?

... judicial intervention has been withheld by lower courts.

speaking of which, what's the deal with aclu 'racing to' their favorite judge (the rt hon tds infected leftist activist mr boasBerg)? Who denied them and for that matter didn't even have in his lane a situation in tejas?

How's that impartial, if a tds infected leftist activist applicant can approach a favorite judge directly?

#80 | Posted by et_al
There is no injunction.

Hmm...

24A1007 A.A.R.P. v. Trump (04/19/2025)
Supreme Court of the United States (.gov)
https://www.supremecourt.gov 24a1007_22p3
PDF
20 hours ago " A.A.R.P., ET AL. v. DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT. OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTION. [April ...

A stay 'simply suspend[s] judicial alteration of the status quo,' " whereas an injunction " 'grants judicial intervention that has been withheld by lower courts.

-looks like injunction to me, but I'm not a highly-trained lawyer doin it for free. they asked for an injunction, and judicial intervention has been withheld by lower courts.

#74 | Posted by Effeteposer
The Administration was IGNORING appellate court orders.

citation needed.
As far as I know, Trump's only beefs have been with leftist activist DISTRICT level tds infected dei judges.

It's interesting that the per curia injunction remains unexplained and unsigned, yet the dissent is presented whole.

#17 | Posted by ClownShack
classic projection

liberals generate and install explicit gay propaganda in children's schools then point at noticers, drooling "duh yer a pedo"

also you're wrong about "support trump"; really it's only "don't support tds morons"
that part's not as much of projection, simply tds moron presumptive delusion.

^#62 also

#63
It's simple, really. A matter of commonsense. You just don't understand because you're tds moron.
You with the other 21% of the tds morons stay out of the way while the adults clean up the horrific mess that you've made.

#11
only a stage four tds moron would think these books are anything other than leftist origin.

^lol your best post

#9 Posted by Yodavagina
OK!

#47
which ones are gang members

-Let's begin with the twice-adjudicated gang members with known gang tattoos and known gang associations.

The President of El Salvador walked all over him.

#41 | Posted by ClownShack

-They were singing a duet, moron. Both together owned the tds moron press.

It's possible that the narrative is wearing thin and more people are remembering that there are two sides to every story.

et al, can you enlighten me as to possibly why the order is unsigned?
Are they giving the circuit court time to hear the case?

#37 | Posted by ClownShack
fo tds moron

"The Government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court,"

I don't see what good any of this does. They're just going to be held in detention now, instead of going home to breathe the clean air of venezuela and reunion with their cholos.

Is GITMO part of "the United States " Maybe hold them there instead of sending them home.
They most certainly will not be released.

Title: A.A.R.P., et al., Applicants v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al

"The Government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court,"

-Why is the unsigned order directed at "The Government " instead of "Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al"?

Per curiam opinion: An unsigned opinion,

"The Government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court," the justices said in a brief, unsigned decision.

Orders that are issued without an opinion are often unsigned, meaning that no one justice takes responsibility for them, and no Justice thinks it worth registering a dissent.

Short opinions are sometimes issued per curiam meaning "by the court". This means that no one Justice takes responsibility or credit for them, either. They are usually brief and non-controversial, perhaps procedural.

Is a Court Order Legally Binding if Not Signed by a Judge?
JustAnswer
https://www.justanswer.com Family Law
Jan 16, 2024 " Generally speaking, no, an unsigned order isn't binding on anyone. Parties frequently draft and submit orders to the court for approval.