Advertisement
SCOTUS Puts a Hold on Trump's Deportations
"The government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this court," the court said in a brief early Saturday note. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
YAV
Joined 2005/09/24Visited 2025/04/15
Status: user
MORE STORIES
SCOTUS Puts a Hold on Trump's Deportations (60 comments) ...
Trump Admin Continues to Purge Women from Our Military (10 comments) ...
Marjorie Taylor Greene - A perfect representation of MAGA (36 comments) ...
'Nazis got better treatment,' Judge says of Trump Admin's AEA Deportations (14 comments) ...
US Limits Canadian Cross-border Library Access After 100 Yrs (16 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Of course Alito and Thomas were all for deporting without due process under a law that every sane human knows doesn't apply.
#1 | Posted by YAV at 2025-04-19 08:26 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
Someone who loves America is going to have to hijack a plane and fly it into the Treasonous Supreme Court.
It's the only way to keep these disgusting, disease carrying immigrants from invading our country.
#2 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-19 08:30 AM | Reply
You don't have a d**n clue why they dissented. Why don't you wait for their reasons instead of speculating?
#3 | Posted by et_al at 2025-04-19 11:02 AM | Reply
Good point.
Alito is still figuring out how to put together the semblance of a sensible argument to support his dissent.
Thomas, the Harriet Miers of the Court, knows he is too lazy and too stupid to pull that off, so he'll just agree with Alito.
"Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented from the court's order. They did not provide any explanation for their votes on Saturday morning, but the order indicated a statement from Alito would follow"
#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-19 11:11 AM | Reply
Alito and Thomas are Corrupt.
They dissented to please Trump.
Any "Legal" spin is BS.
Any "Reasons" given for dissenting are Lies.
In the Tank for Trump, that's the Reason, legalese notwithstanding.
#5 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2025-04-19 11:13 AM | Reply
Supreme Court justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas are so sleazy and corrupt it's easy to forget they weren't nominated by Donald Trump.
~ Middle Age Riot ~
#6 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-04-19 11:46 AM | Reply
It seems to me if one president can let millions in with minimal vetting it should be just as easy to remove those same individuals.
#7 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-04-19 12:44 PM | Reply
You don't have a d**n clue why they dissented.
True.
I have zero respect for Alito and Thomas. I don't trust either one of them. I don't believe either one of them.
So perhaps my personal view of these two massive corrupt losers is a bit tainted.
#8 | Posted by YAV at 2025-04-19 01:13 PM | Reply
#7 - sure, if you ignore the Constitution...
#9 | Posted by YAV at 2025-04-19 01:14 PM | Reply
Every president since the 60s has let "millions in with minimum vetting".
And no it's not as easy to get them all out once they are in. Some yes. Many no.
Not if you follow the law as written.
Maybe it's a more complex issue than your little maga brain can comprehend?
Perhaps Trumpy should not have tanked the bipartisan immigration bill Congress was attempting to pass to help reform our nations immigration laws.
#10 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-04-19 01:18 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2
" You don't have a d**n clue why they dissented."
I do.
Leonard Leo.
Oh, they'll find some issue to dress-up. But the real answer seems obvious: Only toadies get invites from the yacht crowd.
#11 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-04-19 01:33 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2
"It seems to me if one president can let millions in with minimal vetting it should be just as easy to remove those same individuals."
That might be your worst equivalence of the year! The equivalent of letting people enter... is letting people leave.
You're comparing the State letting people enter freely, To a President invoking the police powers of the State to round up ten million people at gunpoint.
This comparison seems apt to you because you are a Statist.
#12 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-19 02:17 PM | Reply
The dissenters warned:
"The implication of the Government's position is that not only noncitizens but also United States citizens could be taken off the streets, forced onto planes, and confined to foreign prisons with no opportunity for redress if judicial review is denied unlawfully before removal."
^ That's a feature, not a bug. It would be refreshing if a Republican could simply admit the point of all this is to disappear people without judicial review.
#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-19 02:25 PM | Reply
FINALLY the US Supreme Court does something: 1) Correctly; 2) Constitutional; 3) Moral and Just; 4) Important and Contrary to Project 2025!
And Lord forgive, but I really really despise Alito. What a shitty excuse for a human being.
#14 | Posted by moder8 at 2025-04-19 02:29 PM | Reply
ONE SMALL STEP in the correct direction. Shocking though that it was only 7-2. The corrupt Thomas in the minority opinion, OF COURSE.
#15 | Posted by e1g1 at 2025-04-19 02:38 PM | Reply
You don't have a d**n clue why they dissented. Why don't you wait for their reasons instead of speculating? #3 | Posted by et_al at 2025-04-19 11:02 AM
Because they are both bribed from many years ago. It's all out in the open.
#16 | Posted by e1g1 at 2025-04-19 02:40 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
A.A.R.P. et al?
#17 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-04-19 03:02 PM | Reply
Docket for 24A1007 Supreme Court of the United States (.gov) https://www.supremecourt.gov docket html public 12 hours ago " No. 24A1007. Title: A.A.R.P., et al., Applicants v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. Docketed: April 18, 2025. Lower Ct: United States ...
You have to go back. So do they.
#18 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-04-19 03:08 PM | Reply
Liberal activist mole forges unsigned SC dictate while judges asleep, film at eleven...
#19 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-04-19 03:10 PM | Reply
#10 | Posted by donnerboy
Bingo!!
#20 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2025-04-19 03:27 PM | Reply
DEATH TO TYRANTS
#21 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-04-19 03:44 PM | Reply
Palantir must be stopped.
#22 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-04-19 04:04 PM | Reply
It is amazing to me how hard the left fights to keep gang members, murderers and rapists in this country.
#23 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-04-19 04:25 PM | Reply
Reminder jeff is a lying pos troll
I'm a borderline Hall of Fame troll, Alexandrite. I easily elicit multiple responses with a single post. And it doesn't take any effort. #27 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-04-06 05:42 PM
#24 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-04-19 04:28 PM | Reply
lol like shitler is gonna listen to this
my prediction is they will spin this as a victory for the president
#25 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-04-19 04:30 PM | Reply
lol like shitler is gonna listen to this my prediction is they will spin this as a victory for the president
Posted by truthhurts at 2025-04-19 04:30 PM | Reply
SCOTUS isn't the four year old kid of your boss. Just sayin.
#26 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-04-19 04:37 PM | Reply
what power dos the SC have to stop him?
#27 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-04-19 04:40 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
- Palantir must be stopped. #22 | Posted by redlightrobot
"Strewth'!"
#28 | Posted by Corky at 2025-04-19 04:43 PM | Reply
As Truth pointed out, they have no power to stop him. Well just keep deporting until they decide to deport themselves.
#29 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-04-19 04:54 PM | Reply
@#27
I was thinking the same thing. What If Trump thumbs his nose at the SC.
How is this decision enforced?
#30 | Posted by shane at 2025-04-19 05:12 PM | Reply
Am I the only one that noticed they got the name of the applicant wrong? Is the AARP involved? I thought it was the ACLU?? What are the ramifications of such an error, I would ask the resident legal expert.
#31 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-04-19 05:18 PM | Reply
Per curiam opinion: An unsigned opinion,
"The Government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court," the justices said in a brief, unsigned decision.
Orders that are issued without an opinion are often unsigned, meaning that no one justice takes responsibility for them, and no Justice thinks it worth registering a dissent.
Short opinions are sometimes issued per curiam meaning "by the court". This means that no one Justice takes responsibility or credit for them, either. They are usually brief and non-controversial, perhaps procedural.
Is a Court Order Legally Binding if Not Signed by a Judge? JustAnswer https://www.justanswer.com Family Law Jan 16, 2024 " Generally speaking, no, an unsigned order isn't binding on anyone. Parties frequently draft and submit orders to the court for approval.
#32 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-04-19 05:30 PM | Reply
I was thinking the same thing. What If Trump thumbs his nose at the SC. How is this decision enforced? #30 | POSTED BY SHANE
Normally it's enforced by Congress.
Don't hold your breath.
#33 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-19 05:35 PM | Reply
#31
It's a pseudonym. Here's the ACLU's case page. www.aclu.org
#34 | Posted by et_al at 2025-04-19 05:35 PM | Reply
Title: A.A.R.P., et al., Applicants v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al
"The Government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court,"
-Why is the unsigned order directed at "The Government " instead of "Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al"?
#35 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-04-19 05:36 PM | Reply
As Truth pointed out, they have no power to stop him. Well just keep deporting until they decide to deport themselves. #29 | POSTED BY BLUEWAFFLES
Long live Emperor Trump!
Right Waffles?
Glad you democracy haters are speaking up about your desires to be ruled by a monarchy.
#36 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-19 05:36 PM | Reply
It's a pseudonym. Here's the ACLU's case page. www.aclu.org #34 | POSTED BY ET_AL
God bless you for all your effort to educate these trolls.
They're not interested in the truth.
But it's good to see you correcting their lies and ignorance.
#37 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-19 05:38 PM | Reply
I don't see what good any of this does. They're just going to be held in detention now, instead of going home to breathe the clean air of venezuela and reunion with their cholos.
Is GITMO part of "the United States " Maybe hold them there instead of sending them home. They most certainly will not be released.
#38 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-04-19 05:50 PM | Reply
#37 | Posted by ClownShack fo tds moron
#39 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-04-19 05:53 PM | Reply
et al, can you enlighten me as to possibly why the order is unsigned? Are they giving the circuit court time to hear the case?
#40 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-04-19 06:10 PM | Reply
#39 | POSTED BY *ITCHYPEDO
My favorite part about what's happening with Kilmar Garcia, was when the president of El Salvador told Trump to fkkk off.
Trump is the most impotent president of the United States.
What a pathetic loser.
The President of El Salvador walked all over him.
#41 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-19 06:14 PM | Reply
Can anybody remind me of the last time the president of El Salvador told the President of America what to do?
Teddy Roosevelt would've shot Bukele in his face.
#42 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-19 06:16 PM | Reply
#41 | Posted by ClownShack
-They were singing a duet, moron. Both together owned the tds moron press.
#43 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-04-19 06:43 PM | Reply
They were singing a duet
Was it, "Fkkk the United States of America"?
Seems to be a hit with deplorable Trumping MAGAts.
Trump's own Supreme Court ruled against his actions.
The president of El Salvador told them to fkkk off.
Trump didn't do anything but fill up his diapers.
Because he's a weak man and a coward.
What a pathetic excuse for a President Trump is.
What pathetic excuses for Americans Trumpers are.
#44 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-19 06:50 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
" It is amazing to me how hard the left fights to keep gang members, murderers and rapists in this country."
What's amazing to me is how you consistently leave out the salient part.
In this case you've gone so far as to create a strawman, so be sure to bookmark this post next time you need an example.
#45 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-04-19 06:57 PM | Reply
Get back to us when Trump gets around to deporting the Proud Boys or the KKK.
#46 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-19 06:59 PM | Reply
The part about identifying which ones are gang members, murderers and rapists?
#47 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-04-19 07:10 PM | Reply
They all are.
Mexico sent them.
Trump said so.
#48 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-19 07:12 PM | Reply
Well, now we should take a page from the Democrats and quickly stack the court with justices that have taken a loyalty oath to Trump.
#49 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-04-19 07:19 PM | Reply
#47 which ones are gang members
-Let's begin with the twice-adjudicated gang members with known gang tattoos and known gang associations.
#50 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-04-19 07:20 PM | Reply
It's amazing to me how eager you are to shht on out Constitution because you have determined these people are all "gang members, murders, and rapists." Facts are that that is flatly not true, and even if some - or all were - they all are entitled to due process. ALL persons.
But instead what you and Trump are doing is exactly what Joe McCarthy did. Instead of painting everyone as "communists" Trump and his cadre paint them as murderers, criminals, rapists, and worse. McCarthyism was "The "Red Scare."
Today's version is "The Brown Scare" and you are no different than those that seized on the lies of McCarthy to ruin peoples lives.
#51 | Posted by YAV at 2025-04-19 07:24 PM | Reply
He did say the the straight white men were good people. Especially the rich ones.
#52 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-04-19 07:28 PM | Reply
"It is amazing to me how hard the left fights to keep gang members, murderers and rapists in this country."
We're fighting to keep rights in this country.
You're not fighting gang members. You're fighting the Constitution.
#53 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-19 07:32 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
what power does the SC have to stop him?
#27 | Posted by truthhurts
Exactly. Like Stalin vs. the pope. "Him and whose army?"
#54 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-04-19 08:03 PM | Reply
...left fights to keep gang members, murderers and rapists in this country. #23 | Posted by BellRinger
Do you support random drug tests for all citizens? Do you support random 2am raids in hopes of uncovering drug dealers?No? It's amazing how you want to keep drugs in your community.
Do you support random on the streets DNA tests so we can solve unsolved rapes?No It's amazing how you support rape.
Your logic is imbecilic.
We all want violent undocumented aliens locked up and deported, we just believe using due process and human rights makes us better than them. You are no better than them.
#55 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2025-04-19 08:09 PM | Reply
"we just believe using due process and human rights makes us better than them. #55 | Posted by TFDNihilist"
No - actually you don't believe in due process or following the law or any of the other talking points the Dems are desperately trying to put out now to explain why they are demanding to keep illegal, wife beating, gang members in the country.
It is beyond clear now that the plan under Biden was to 'flood the zone' with numbers of illegals that would make the immigration court system break due to the sheer numbers. We are done playing your games and your illegals are going back - ALL OF THEM. YOU should not have brought them here in the first place and I believe the Democrat party, their NGOs, and their liberal activist judges should be arrested and tried under RICO for child and drug trafficking AND they should be charged for every crime committed by an illegal in the US that their criminal conspiracy brought to this country.
#56 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-04-19 08:25 PM | Reply
That's the main flaw with the Constitution. It assumes that the President is not an abjectly stupid, ignorant, selfish, greedy, tantrum-throwing lunatic, so it lets them do pretty much whatever they want.
Took a long time for one to come along, but he's here mow.
#57 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-04-19 08:30 PM | Reply
Clown, he's not an emperor but if you guys keep supporting stupid causes the American people might end up making him one.
#58 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-04-19 08:30 PM | Reply
...the American people might end up making him one.
By what means?
#59 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-04-19 08:38 PM | Reply
"That's the main flaw with the Constitution. #57 | Posted by REDIAL"
So says the Canadian not covered by the US Constitution.
#60 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-04-19 08:53 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
