A.A.R.P. et al?

Docket for 24A1007
Supreme Court of the United States (.gov)
https://www.supremecourt.gov docket html public
12 hours ago " No. 24A1007. Title: A.A.R.P., et al., Applicants v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. Docketed: April 18, 2025. Lower Ct: United States ...

You have to go back. So do they.

Liberal activist mole forges unsigned SC dictate while judges asleep, film at eleven...

Am I the only one that noticed they got the name of the applicant wrong?
Is the AARP involved? I thought it was the ACLU??
What are the ramifications of such an error, I would ask the resident legal expert.

Per curiam opinion: An unsigned opinion,

"The Government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court," the justices said in a brief, unsigned decision.

Orders that are issued without an opinion are often unsigned, meaning that no one justice takes responsibility for them, and no Justice thinks it worth registering a dissent.

Short opinions are sometimes issued per curiam meaning "by the court". This means that no one Justice takes responsibility or credit for them, either. They are usually brief and non-controversial, perhaps procedural.

Is a Court Order Legally Binding if Not Signed by a Judge?
JustAnswer
https://www.justanswer.com Family Law
Jan 16, 2024 " Generally speaking, no, an unsigned order isn't binding on anyone. Parties frequently draft and submit orders to the court for approval.

Title: A.A.R.P., et al., Applicants v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al

"The Government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court,"

-Why is the unsigned order directed at "The Government " instead of "Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al"?

"The Government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court,"

I don't see what good any of this does. They're just going to be held in detention now, instead of going home to breathe the clean air of venezuela and reunion with their cholos.

Is GITMO part of "the United States " Maybe hold them there instead of sending them home.
They most certainly will not be released.

#37 | Posted by ClownShack
fo tds moron

et al, can you enlighten me as to possibly why the order is unsigned?
Are they giving the circuit court time to hear the case?

The President of El Salvador walked all over him.

#41 | Posted by ClownShack

-They were singing a duet, moron. Both together owned the tds moron press.

#47
which ones are gang members

-Let's begin with the twice-adjudicated gang members with known gang tattoos and known gang associations.

#63
It's simple, really. A matter of commonsense. You just don't understand because you're tds moron.
You with the other 21% of the tds morons stay out of the way while the adults clean up the horrific mess that you've made.

^#62 also

It's interesting that the per curia injunction remains unexplained and unsigned, yet the dissent is presented whole.

#74 | Posted by Effeteposer
The Administration was IGNORING appellate court orders.

citation needed.
As far as I know, Trump's only beefs have been with leftist activist DISTRICT level tds infected dei judges.

#80 | Posted by et_al
There is no injunction.

Hmm...

24A1007 A.A.R.P. v. Trump (04/19/2025)
Supreme Court of the United States (.gov)
https://www.supremecourt.gov 24a1007_22p3
PDF
20 hours ago " A.A.R.P., ET AL. v. DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT. OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTION. [April ...

A stay 'simply suspend[s] judicial alteration of the status quo,' " whereas an injunction " 'grants judicial intervention that has been withheld by lower courts.

-looks like injunction to me, but I'm not a highly-trained lawyer doin it for free. they asked for an injunction, and judicial intervention has been withheld by lower courts.

... judicial intervention has been withheld by lower courts.

speaking of which, what's the deal with aclu 'racing to' their favorite judge (the rt hon tds infected leftist activist mr boasBerg)? Who denied them and for that matter didn't even have in his lane a situation in tejas?

How's that impartial, if a tds infected leftist activist applicant can approach a favorite judge directly?

#87 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY
Otherwise, we become a banana republic.

-Import the banana, become the banana

BTW, Trump FUBAR'd the most sweeping bipartisan immigration reform bill in decades. It would have fixed a LOT of problems.

-Oh, you mean the donothing bill that would increase spending and still bring in up to 5000 illegals / day with no actual limit? The bill that included more grift for Ukraine and The Big Guy, which have fk-all to do with the border? The bill that tried to hold US hostage and claimed baldfaced that "we can't do anything without the bill", and the new president actually did something without the bill... that bill?

Alito's FOS.

#88 | Posted by et_al

-maybe you're FOS.