The Germans didn't know what was happening to the people in WWII. All those camps, trains full of people, leaving empty houses and buildings all over Germany.

What's happening in England and most of Europe just is new news. Nobody could have known.

Just like the US and Epstein. He did it alone, well...maybe with the maxwell person. But,that's it. Nobody else could be tried because. Well, the law only allows the prosecution of one person at a time. The prosecution needs to rest between trials.

Mail-In Contributions: If you prefer to write a check or money order, you can make it payable to "Bureau of the Fiscal Service" and mail it to:

Gifts to the United States
Department of the Treasury
P.O. Box 1328
Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Anyone of the billionaires who claim they don't mind paying more taxes can just write a check.

After the election, we think about who win, who lost, and where improvements could be made.

Then, we wait for the next election, for better candidates.

We don't get better ones. We get the same ones. Any new ones are just copies of the old ones.

The results are the same.

How do we know?

We you are an elected representative, you are expected to vote with the party always.

Everyone knows, that representatives from different States, must vote with the Party's platform. Screw your State. Screw your constituents.

It's vote Party line or you are a traitor to be removed at the first opportunity.

The news likes to point out those that don't vote along the party vote. Nobody asks if the traitor is actually right.

Tiffany Henyard.

Stewart is slacking.

I'm convinced of the potential of a scorched earth policy after midterms.

Never saw an individual get such tax treatment forever.

But, according to the NYT per a secret deal never confirmed, one religion gets tax breaks, (including all their members), forever.

Strange the NYT really believes the religion lost every single tax court case and got a deal.

Lamp,

Take the Supreme Court and set the court at 6 for one party and 3 for the other.

We know the judges are selected on their personal point of view.

Take two sets of these 9 judges.

If the two groups, on specific cases, vote 6-3, that means the Supreme Court decision for the whole country went in one direction solely based on their personal opinion.

Why should it be overruled? Which is actually right? The Court that made tye first decision or the other?

When anyone without a law degree can tell you which way the court will decide solely on who put them there, how can you know the precedent should stand?

9-0 cases would need some real reasoning to overturn that precedent and I wouldn't support an easy overturn.

Ideology cases don't establish who's right. It only tells us who people support for their side.

Of course they are throwing harder.

Pitchers only have to last a few innings. What's the number of pitches per game now? 50?

Cy Young records are safe.

Screw precedence.

Any ruling 5-4 or 6-3 that is obviously determined by ideology can change.

It's the court's fault for not sticking to law and the Constitution.

Either Congress rewrites the law or amends the Constitution.

String theory resolved

Hey, just let your young job searchers, and old, that sone jobs responses need to be vetted right on the response.

Just waiting for 535 replaced by AI

The US Empire. 50 States and territories.

That's it.

900+ US Foreign military bases? No problem with that shrinking.

Downsizing and total withdrawal of troops stationed outside the US? That's a financial win for the US and a financial loss for those countries. Boo hoo

The only silence I want is when I'm fishing. Relaxing with a line. Don't need anyone's chatter.

Revoke the 17th. The States were idiots.

Segregation was supposed to end, not get restarted.
What's worse is people are asking and wanting it for themselves. They want their own bathrooms, water fountains, buildings, events, etc.

Dismantling segregation and racial discrimination only to rebuild it by the real racists.

JustAGirl_Idaho, me too. End the nonsense.

Let AI draw the maps with no bias.

It shouldn't be that hard to have the program reviewed and approved by professionals that can attest the AI program will draw fairly and to the law.

Guaranteed, both parties won't want that.