BOAZ wants more violent criminals. Justifies the police state he's been begging for.

Nonviolent offenders who are imprisoned are significantly more likely to recidivate (i.e., reoffend) violently.

Now, suddenly, that missing minute is available?
#5 | Posted by LampLighter

Bondi was lying.

What does Venus, Mars, and Jupiter got that we don't!?

#46 | Posted by gtbritishskull

"They're eating the dogs. They're eating the cats!"

^^ This worked. What makes you think something like it won't work again?

Odd that when Democrats had to power to release the documents it was crickets. Now that Biden's auto-pen stooges had time to obliterate all chain of custody of the documents, these claims are being made. Given all of the false charges leveled against Trump over the last 12 years if there was anything incriminating it would have been leaked by now. So yawn.
#20 | Posted by visitor_

The Biden administration and DOJ were bound by federal grand jury secrecy laws and court precedents, which prohibit them from releasing the Epstein files unless a judge specifically orders their disclosure through an established legal process. Neither the Trump nor Biden administrations had the legal authority to release the files on their own[1][2][3][9].

You see the difference?
#26 | Posted by eberly

Trump lied on a debate stage that Haitian immigrants, invited into the US by Biden, were slaughtering and eating their neighbors' pets, and it helped get him elected. This is where the electorate is now: they eat up bull s h it that just possibly sounds true. Democrats refuse to do this and they are paying a hefty price. Had they run this type of message in the lead-up to 2024 about Trump and Epstein as heavily as the Right ran with fake news about pet-eating Haitian immigrants, it may have had an impact. But they didn't, they sat on their hands and waited for Trump to step in his own sh it only after he was elected, then tried to pounce. But by then, it was too late. And in actuality, also too early to have a positive impact on the midterms for vulnerable Dems. Just really poor timing by the Dems all around, but it's not surprising. They refuse to learn, refuse to recognize how the electorate has evolved during this era of social media. And now we all suffer for it.

Mr. Trump was repeatedly asked about Mr. Epstein. He responded by pivoting to allegations against Mr. Obama and Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election, saying "that's the witch hunt you should be talking about." ...

So he's calling the "B. Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton Created the Russia 2016 Election Interference Story" a witch hunt? Curious use of words, considering he labeled all the accusations against him "with hunts." Either the "B. Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton Created the Russia 2016 Election Interference Story" is nothing more than a witch hunt, meaning it's not true, or the allegations against him in the previous "witch hunts" are actually true.

Which is it, cultists? Explain what Trump was trying to say! Make it make sense!

how does that work?
#38 | Posted by eberly

I can't figure out why Trump and the Republican congress would be running cover for pe do Joe and Bill Clinton, can you?

#17 | Posted by visitor_

Careful Trump doesn't try to slip his dingy in your gaping mouth, cultist!

JUST IN: Pam Bondi Already Told Trump His Name Is in the Epstein Files

A bombshell new report from The Wall Street Journal confirms that President Donald Trump's name is in the Epstein files -- and that he's known since May.

Dems would be wise to stay on this.
#72 | Posted by BellRinger

You and Clowny got me so excited!! And then ^^this.

God damn it GOD DAMN IT!

No fact checker supports the statement that Mike Johnson adopted an 11-year-old boy as a single man.

Credible reporting instead shows Johnson and his wife took in a 14-year-old boy as newlyweds, without conducting a formal legal adoption

#44 | Posted by ClownShack

You can't prove otherwise, why are you making this such an issue?

He didn't adopt him and he was not single.
#33 | Posted by eberly

And the kid was 14, not 11.

I saw him back in 2004. He looked like and sounded like he was in his 70s back then.

#31 | Posted by redlightrobot

The claim is false. Take a look at #22

I wonder how Alice Cooper would define woke in this context.

So then he did have intent to kill. Just not at first. All of a sudden it just... washed over him.
#13 | Posted by snoofy

Exactly, that's the difference between first-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter. The latter is often described as a crime committed in the heat of passion.

The claim that 'Speaker of the House Mike Johnson "adopted" an 11-year-old son when he was a single 25-year-old man' is inaccurate based on available reports.

- Timeline and Age: Mike Johnson and his wife Kelly took in a teenager named Michael when they were newlyweds, and Michael was 14 years old at that time"not 11. Johnson was not a single man; he was married when they took Michael in[2][3][12][13].
- Nature of Relationship: The Johnsons did **not formally adopt Michael**. According to Johnson and his representatives, they took "custody" of Michael, but due to the "lengthy adoption process," there was never a formal, legal adoption[2][3][12][13]. He has sometimes referred to Michael as his "adopted" son, but this is not a legal designation.
- Michael's Public Profile: As an adult, Michael has chosen to remain out of Johnson's public life, and the Johnsons have respected that preference[2][3][5].

There is no evidence that Johnson informally or formally "adopted" Michael as a single man at age 25, nor that Michael was 11 at the time. Instead, the Johnsons took a 14-year-old Michael"whom they met through church youth ministry"into their home after they married, and Michael remained part of their family without a formal adoption[2][3][9][12][13].

My concern is that Trump, the tyrant, feeling trapped will take his tyranny to this next level in order to escape.
And then there is this----Donald Trump is suffering massive narcissistic injuries over this sex stuff. He never forgets and he never forgives. It's a compulsion. There will be acts of animal revenge.
#11 | Posted by Zed

You mean like accusing B. Hussein Obama of treason? LOL

#5 | Posted by Zed

The folks over at r/Conservative on Reddit are not happy. They too are worried this is an attempt to move along and find it shady as hell. How ironic it would be if the Epstein files break apart the cult!

#10 | Posted by visitor_

She was a victim of an officer falsifying evidence for a warrant. Had that not happened, she would still be alive. Just like poor Ashli: Had Trump simply conceded the election, just like every other losing POTUS candidate in history, Ashli Babbitt would still be alive.

33 months for 1st degree murder. jfc.
#8 | Posted by Alexandrite

He wasn't the fnkcer that caused her death. Nor did he have the intent to kill her when approaching the house. He was the idiot that started shooting randomly after being shot at, including shooting into the neighbor's house.