"Why, because she may have told the truth back in February?
#73 | Posted by LampLighter"

Because she lost the public trust - she lied then (or assumed wrong - incompetence) or she is lying now. There is no explanation under which she deserves to keep her job.

"None of your so-called "statistics" are true.
#24 | Posted by LegallyYourDead"

"#21 | Posted by LegallyYourDead"

What part is racist?

1.) Saying that blacks commit 60%+ of murders in the US?
2.) Saying that blacks vote Democrat at an 80% clip?
3.) Noticing the two points above to be facts?

"#65 Either way she comes out of this looking bad.
#66 | Posted by BellRinger"

Yep - she needs to be fired and they need to appoint Matt Gaetz at the next Senate recess to win back the trust of MAGA.

"#19 | Posted by LegallyYourDead"

You skipped right by the part where the data does not support your ridiculous argument and you admit you are wrong - how about we circle back to that -------?

"Good question. She has certainly made herself look bad by doing so.
#64 | Posted by BellRinger"

Either she is a liar or made the assumption that it was included in the files the FBI were hiding in NYC and was wrong.

"#15 | Posted by reinheitsgebot"

Again with your fake 'red state' vs. 'blue state' --------. Counties won by Kamala represent 65% of all murders and 50% of the US population. For Trump, it is 35% and 50% - counties won by Democrats are more violent at almost a 2:1 ratio - I don't give 2 ----- if the counties are grouped into a 'red state' or 'blue state' - the problem is that murder is committed in Dem voting/controlled areas at shocking rates.

Of course, this is the common sense conclusion as we also know that blacks represent 60%+ of all murders and vote Democrat at an 80% clip.

I would even go further to state that the already ultraviolent Dem counties benefit from a largely non-violent red population as a VAST majority of the crimes in blue counties are committed by Dems or Democrat aligned groups (see the above stats on blacks as evidence for this).

Just stop with the fake 'red state' vs. 'blue state' divide - it is deep blue -------- cities vs. normal people living in red areas.

#13 | Posted by reinheitsgebot"

Tell me the "red" state that does not have a deep blue -------- city OR - in the case of mountain and plains states - widespread Indian reservations disproportionately driving up the murder rates. The 'red' part of the states is not the problem.

Let's have some more fun with numbers on the 'red' states. Omaha, Nebraska is known as the 'blue dot' in the otherwise red state. Omaha accounted for a ~45% of all murders despite being under 30% of the total state population and - unsurprisingly, voted for Kamala in 2024.

Again, a pattern that is repeated over and over and over again. Deep blue -------- cities, whether in 'red' states or 'blue' states are crime filled --------s. Red state just have enough normal people to outvote them but is does not change the characteristics of the people residing in the deep blue -------- cities - violent, angry liberal voters.

"#11 | Posted by Reinheitsgebot"

Read #10 again - real slow this time so you can understand it -------.

"Red state --------- have the highest murder rates because they're run by repug ----------.
#8 | Posted by reinheitsgebot"

There is no such thing as a 'red state' - you have red suburban and rural areas surrounding deep blue -------- cities. Depending on the size and number of deep blue -------- cities that are in a state, the state is qualified by red or blue by stupid people that don't understand the dynamics at play. Take Tennessee for an example - Memphis accounts for 60-70% of all statewide murders (depending on the year) but accounts for under 10% of the population. Memphis voted 2:1 for Harris despite the state voting 2:1 for Trump. So, your biggest issue with this 'red state' is the deep blue -------- that resides within it causing all the problems. Rinse and repeat this for Michigan, etc and even for California and New York.

"If a list does (did?) exist and Trump's name was on it, no way that doesn't get leaked to the press while Biden was in office.
#59 | Posted by BellRinger"

BINGO!

The only logical conclusion is that 'too big of names' were on it (not Trump) and or the FBI shredded it under Biden.

On the 'too big of names' - the justification I can see is it if contained US military and or politicians that were blackmailed into committed treason against the US. That would move it outside simple embarrassment to calls for public execution. I could see Rubio on that list - he is the exact type of person that they would target and his 100% support for Israel may be the result.

Any evidence that existed was destroyed under Biden when the case was handled by the NYC FBI office - or, is being used now to blackmail the people on the list. For me, I believe Epstein was Mossad, which also explains how Israel has so much control over our country. Part of this being closed could simply be to shield Israel and avoid disruptions to the economy and government. But, I say actually release all the files and those that did wrongs need to be punished - and I 100% believe there is client list.

50% of murderers get away with it - IN DEEP BLUE -------- CITIES. Also, it has little, if anything to due with staffing levels. It is due to gang related killings (which appear more or less random) and a culture in which people that reside in these deep blue -------- cities refuse to talk to the police. Deep blue -------- cities like Chicago and Oakland have clearance rates in the 30's or below.

Further, it should be noted that the % of murders committed by blacks in the US hover around 60% for cases in which a suspect has been identified. Taking into account the case closure rate is MUCH, MUCH lower in deep blue -------- cities with a lot of gang and drug violence, the actual murder rate for blacks in the US are about 70% of all murders. We have huge issue in the US and it starts with the culture being taught in deep blue -------- cities.

"The government caused these problems.
#20 | Posted by Imshakinitboss"

The government didn't cause the problem - they just enabled stupid people to make stupid choices and now we have the entirely predictable result. The core issue is college costs being too high (which the colleges have not yet addressed) and their ROI due to teaching watered down classes is too low (which the colleges have not addressed yet). The 'fix' is 2-stage: first the government makes the current crop of stupid grads pay for their schooling and it serves as an example to the next crop of future college students. Enrollment falls (which we are seeing) and colleges will be forced to reduce costs and increase quality to entice the students back. It is a problem 30-40 years in the making and will take a decade to solve. A big part will be getting rid of the 90% liberal professors in most departments and replacing them with someone with actual practical experience and critical thinking skills.

"#16 | Posted by oneironaut"

Based on the writing style, Bill Boy seems to be an alt account for Lamplighter. Same no substance posting, same goofy line spacing, same goof 'link' requests. I guess I should ignore that account too.

"LOL. This guy is a riot.
#14 | Posted by REDIAL"

Yes, asking Google the inflation as defined by the change in prices from May 2024 to May 2025 and stating that is the current rate of inflation (when we he a step-function decrease once Trump came to office) is pretty ------- stupid - but, unfortunately, par for the course for economic-illiterate, ------- liberals.

"Google tells us core inflation is 2.8, not your --------.
#12 | Posted by LegallyYourDead"

That is a YOU problem because you are too stupid to understand what I stated so you don't know how to even ask Google the right question. 2.8% is the total change in core inflation from May 2024 to May 2025. That is not what I claimed to measure as this includes ~9 months of ------- Biden policies. What I claimed is that CORE INFLATION UNDER TRUMP - which would be the ACTUAL PRICE INCREASE IN Mar 2025, and April 2025, May 2025, and then annualizing the rate - we exclude Jan and Feb as those are influenced by Biden policies. The 3-month trend annualized gives you a 1.6% rate.

"okeedokey sits to pee :)
#14 | Posted by billy_boy"

You have no need to narrate your actions while posting - this is not year 2000 ICR.

"so we'd all appreciate a link to a reputable source for your claims.
#12 | Posted by billy_boy"

Already provided -------. I already have enough annoyance with lamplighter constantly asking for links, I have no desire to start supplying them for his dopey brother now too.

"Well, if you're smart and can get out, get out.
This place will be on fire next year.
#9 | Posted by LegallyYourDead"

You previously said it would be on fire this year, what changed -------? The fact that you are continually wrong every single month?

We are still in the adjustment period of companies shifting supply chains until the deals are finalized. I saw it reported that the average tariff collected right now is ~20% at US ports. This will adjust up for Vietnam and China as those deals are now done. Despite ------- liberal predictions of collapse and soaring inflation, core inflation under Trump has been 1.6% (annualized rate) and store shelves remain fully stocked. Given the 1.6% core inflation, it means that manufacturers and middlemen have eaten the tariffs as I previously stated they would.

We already had this discussion. This is hitting the black community (especially black women) hard because they, on average, never repay their loans. It is doubly-hard as it is coming at a time of mass layoffs of the DEI industry. Well, a dose of reality can be a bitter pill to swallow.

Wow - with this brain drain going to Europe, maybe their technology can progress beyond the USA's 1990s era. Then again, the real breakthroughs are rarely done by university PhDs as all the actual tech in the private sector is 5+ years beyond anything being taught in a university. For instance, if you took the top PhD grad right now from MIT and placed them into TSMC with the company spending years training them, they would be lost. That is the reality of technology and the real reason that the Indians and Chinese cannot catch up to the US tech progress. The technology in production today is 3+ year old in the making.

I just will never understand why it is considered greedy to want to keep more of my own money (because I am better at allocating it than the government) but not greedy for someone to demand that I turn over my money - especially when the people calling for this pay little, if anything, into the system themselves.