This ---- is months old. Got anything new? So what? Some people didn't want to be in a stupid war. How is this news? It's just old reruns because there's no good new news.

#11 | Posted by Effeteposer

The update is: EVEN MORE people hate him now and EVEN MORE of his army is going to be incompetent.

Of all the causes to stand up for, you're the "whatever putin says" guy? If you're not a russian you're picking a really strange leader to go to bat for on every thread that involves him.

They're all just crisis actors. The whole thing was staged to make people give in to the climate change hoax nazis.

Yeah lets re elect the party THESE PEOPLE prefer.

The total lack of empathy and humanity in the Republican party is disgusting
~ SpeaksSoftly

Florida is getting what it deserves!
~ Also SpeaksSoftly

#95 | Posted by oneironaut

Oh so lack of empathy is bad when democrats have lack of empathy. But you have no problem with republican's lack of empathy. Got it.

My posts were to question how republicans would react to the receiving the treatment they give to liberals. Now we know. Utter hipocrisy.

Internet freedom is a weapon of war,how do you expect to tackle climate change if people don't believe it exists?

#92 | Posted by oneironaut

That was a problem before the internet. Your party started calling it a hoax back in the 90s. Fox news doesn't require the internet to spread their lies.

I give your opinion on climate and a climate study with a ridiculously short time span a low level of credibility.

#75 | Posted by visitor_

My opinion is that you should listen to the people who know more than you do. Your opinion is that you shouldn't and no one knows more than you anyway.

Do you think that you're a smart person? Do you think a study of climate spanning 40 years is conclusive?

#71 | Posted by visitor_

I'm smart enough to listen to smart people. You're dumb enough to listen to morons and liars.

Nothing is ever conclusive. Another favorite technique of pollution puppets is pretending they're reasonable people who are just waiting for "all the data" while the world burns down.

Speaksoftly: "If you were on the side of facts you wouldnt have to keep changing your argument."

Global cooling became global warming which has become climate change.

Studies have predicted both more and stronger storms AND fewer storms.

Science is hard and involves a lot math and often conflicting hypotheses.

#68 | Posted by visitor_

It does. And very smart people know how to interpret that data for you. You should stop listening to the ones who spent 40 years calling climate change a hoax.

I'm older than 40 so my study goes back further.

#59 | Posted by visitor_

So you admit your "study" is just your own personal experience of the weather.

I'm older than 40 and I remember lower temperatures and far fewer wildfires and droughts.

Science has a lot of uncertainty. Climate science regurgitated by non-scientists not so much.

#55 | Posted by visitor_

That's why the smart non scientists listen to the experts. And the moron non scientists think there's no way any scientists could know anything they didn't personally learn in junior high school.

Smart people have been warning about climate change for decades.

While morons have gone from saying it's not real, to saying it's not manmade, to saying there's nothing we can do, to saying it's too expensive, to saying climate change is good.

If you were on the side of facts you wouldnt have to keep changing your argument.

"DeSantis requests Biden make a disaster declaration for all 67 counties in Florida "

Maybe biden should redraw the damage area with a sharpie on a map and say everyone is fine. Why should republicans be the only party to enforce total delusion on the country?

"DeSantis requests Biden make a disaster declaration for all 67 counties in Florida "

Maybe biden should only do that for the counties that voted for him, like desantis or trump would do.

"You support a fascist, it's undeniable, so your only defense is "well you support a fascist too!" without any evidence of said fascism."

I don't support a fascist.

You do though? Right?

Aren't you a B-Bro?

#39 | Posted by madbomber

I'd take him over almost any other leader in politics. Because he's NOT a fascist.

Are we going to play your favorite game where you derail a whole thread into a semantic debate between chinese style socialism and canadian style socialism? Why do you never tire of that game?

"We are a democracy idiot. We vote for our representatives. Your fascist cult lost under that system so they tried to end it."

No. We are a constitutional republic. And had the events on 1/6 gone to the Supreme Court, and they had determined it to be constitutional (just assume for the sake of this academic discussion), then Trump would have been the legal president according to the constitution. And anyone who didn't like it would be an enemy of the constitution. And if they pressed the matter, subject to the full weight of all branches of government.

#38 | Posted by madbomber

That's a FORM of democracy dum dum. How do our senators and congressment get their jobs? How do electors get picked? We vote for them. That's a democracy. That's why your fascist cult tried to overthrow based on the lies from a criminal con man.

"The biggest one is we didn't try to overthrow democracy."

There is no democracy to overthrow.

And you advocate insensately for overthrowing this constitutional republic.

"We also arent so stupid that Qanon idiocy thrives on our side."

If you've bought into the idea that the poor are that way because of rich people, you share a similar intellectual capacity to those who think the Qanonsense is real.

We also didn't become the cult of a fascist con man.

How do you characterize Comrade Bernie? Historically, a capitalist who called himself a socialist was almost certainly a fascist. Mussolini? Hitler?

I could do this all day.

#33 | Posted by madbomber

We are a democracy idiot. We vote for our representatives. Your fascist cult lost under that system so they tried to end it.

The concentration of wealth and corruption of government by the rich is a fact not an insane conspiracy theory like your cult believing that their enemies are blood drinking pedophiles and JFK Jr is alive.

You support a fascist, it's undeniable, so your only defense is "well you support a fascist too!" without any evidence of said fascism.

"They're not the ones picking where these migrants get shipped. Your party is the one shipping them to the dumbest places."

So what is stopping your party from shipping them to less dumb places?

Could it be the less-dumb places are full of people who are like you and may not want a bunch of poor brown people running around?

#34 | Posted by madbomber

Ethics. Morals. Respect for humanity.

Why wouldn't I ask your party's leaders? Aren't they in charge?

#23 | Posted by madbomber a

They're not the ones picking where these migrants get shipped. Your party is the one shipping them to the dumbest places.

How is your party any better?

#22 | Posted by madbomber

A million ways.

The biggest one is we didn't try to overthrow democracy.

We also arent so stupid that Qanon idiocy thrives on our side.

We also didn't become the cult of a fascist con man.

I could do this all day.

Why not send them to places where they can be put to work?

#15 | Posted by madbomber

Ask your party's "leaders."

On Smerconish the other day, there was a woman complaining about migrants being sent to Martha's Vineyard. And he had a point. The summer season is over. Probably not much going on there.

But further west in Minnesota, farmers were having trouble finding people to harvest crops. She suggested they be sent there, where they actually could be put to work.

And I closer to France. And you do have more than enough idiots in whatever -------- you come from. You count as several, actually.

#17 | Posted by madbomber

Future president desantis doesn't care about where migrants are needed. He cares about using government resources to get headlines and troll libs. Even if he has to ship desperate people to a location with no jobs, while other jobs elsewhere are going unfilled. And your party loves him for it.

" But how they're bigger and stronger and more frequent"

Claim not supported by evidence. That is one the models have gotten wrong. Hurricanes have not grown in frequency or intensity by any real measure.

#20 | Posted by BellRinger

Now do droughts.

You allow bitter and hateful politics to dominate all of your thoughts.

#15 | Posted by BellRinger

"Hey all we did was protect oil profits until climate change was unavoidable, catastrophic, and incredibly expensive. What's everyone so BITTER and HATEFUL about?"

#12. So, hurricanes didnt exist prior to the Industrial Revolution?

Good god. No wonder you are wound up like a top. You allow bitter and hateful politics to dominate all of your thoughts.

#15 | Posted by BellRinger

Oh they did. But how they're bigger and stronger and more frequent. Just like droughts. And floods. And blizzards. Just like you were told by smarter people for the past 4 decades while your party of oil puppets and morons called climate change a hoax.

Having different political views from you doesn't make a person evil.

#51 | Posted by BellRinger

No but supporting trump makes you an evil person. Or at least a person so stupid that you're blind to what evil looks like.

I dont always enjoy climate change, but when I do, it's because climate change is punishing a state full of climate change deniers.

I don't always support withholding federal aid, but when I do, it's because a state that wants to bring down the federal government suddenly needs help with a problem they helped cause.