See no reason for him to have a security detail after retirement in the first place.
#75 | Posted by MSgt

Because you also are in denial that you're a member of a violent angry cult who trump targets like a gun at anyone who makes him look bad.

I'm surprised to learn that Fauci had taxpayer security.

#53 | Posted by BellRinger

Because you're in a fascist cult that terrifies its opposition into silence with mob attacks.

No one is surprised that you're still in denial about this.

Honestly reading the comments of people who said quite disgusting things regarding Trump over the last few years (wishing for his death etc) now in all out fear is rather comical. Anyways, as mentioned earlier ... Lord Fauci has $10MM his ass can find his own private security. And wish him good health.

#34 | Posted by Bluewaffles

Trump is supposedly a billionaire. Why did he need secret service protection?

The whole reason fauci NEEDS security is because trump blamed him for his own failures.

Truthfully andry Biden and most Democrats are worthless and corrupt and inept. They feed the corrupt pockets where cronies are fed your taxes. Every dollar sent to California needs to be contingent on changing their consistently bad incompetent behavior and instead bringing in new ideas. Voter ID and honest elections are desperately needed in California .

#25 | Posted by Robson

You dont't care about corruption or you wouldnt worship the most corrupt president we've ever had.

But you're right, the democrats were inept. If that had any brains trump would be in jail instead of the white house.

But weak and dumb is still better than evil and fascist

Why do corrupt public servants need security details? Oh, could it be because they are viewed as political, corrupt and inept?

#22 | Posted by Robson

Because they were demonized as a scapegoat for a terrible leader's terrible record during a crisis.

He wants to throw fauci to the frothing mob of zombies he's created.

This author is talking as if there will be another president after trump. How can people still be so naive?

A democrat GOT US OUT of the mideast since trump lacked the balls.
#29 | POSTED BY SPEAKSOFTLY

For the last 3 years Lumpers like you have been arguing its Trumps fault.

#31 | Posted by oneironaut

Trump negotiated a terrible deal which didn't take effect til he left office. Which allowed him to take credit if it worked and avoid blame if it didn't.

How many terrorists did he release from prison? 5000 ish?

It took six years to build the transcontinental railroad and it hauled freight and passengers during the time it was being built as each section was completed.

#30 | Posted by visitor_

in other words...
"Bring back slaves!"

Brian Sicknick died of natural causes from 2 strokes linked to a blood clot. With the Biden mafia haaving to accept these facts from the coroner, they doubled down and claimed he "died in the line of duty" - another lie.

You clowns only back the blue when they kill people you don't agree with. It's a sickness, get help.

#13 | Posted by lfthndthrds

"Our violent mob of nazis didn't kill him! They just beat him up and he died the next day of totally natural causes!"

Trump keeps his promises.

#10 | Posted by visitor_

You voted for a man who promised to release traitors.

How patriotic.

I wondered where the drama queens were meeting and here....I found you..( except for bluewaffles usual fine response _

.this thread is amazing.....

if you still watch soaps on daytime tv..........and plan on watching "the notebook" later

#9 | Posted by shrimptacodan

And you popped in to remind us that you can't refute a thing liberals are saying, but you can't resist gloating about how your support for fascism upsets the people that you feel inferior to.

I Won't. The neocons have returned to the Democrat party.

#25 | Posted by visitor_

Yes you will. Republicans sent us into afghanistan and lied us into iraq.

A democrat GOT US OUT of the mideast since trump lacked the balls.

Hate, bitter and the perpetual anger of the left makes Dems ugly. Sad isnt it?

#24 | Posted by Robson

"Oh yeah well you're ugly!" I haven't heard debate this convincing since 4th grade.

The last round of tax cuts proved that tax revenues when up when they were enacted. Problem is always the same, when revenues go up Washington finds a way to spend it all.

#2 | Posted by fishpaw

How has the middle class been doing since reaganomics was introduced?

A corrupt Democrat judge said that? Shocker. Trump campaigned that he would do it, the people agreed and he kept his promise. So buzz off.

#3 | Posted by fishpaw

Trumpland. Where NOT being corrupt means you're CORRUPT, and attempting to overthrow democracy means you're a PATRIOT.

We spent a lot in Afghanistan with nothing to show for it too.

#17 | Posted by visitor_

So quit voting for the party that sent us in.

Cali high speed rail. 23 billion spent 0 passenger miles.
Rural internet. 47 billion 0 rural homes hooked up.
EV charging stations. 7.5 billion allocated mayber 200 charging ports.

Not great.

#15 | Posted by visitor_

...obama's birth certificate. not real. 2020 election. stolen. Climate change. Fake. Nazis. Cool again.

What insurrectionist? Was it proven in a court of law, and not just your political opinion?

#50 | Posted by oneironaut

This is how dumb you have to pretend to be to be a modern republican.

The one who sent the mob of deluded morons and fascists to the capitol as part of his elaborate coup attempt.

No its not, read the history of the 14th amendment, and relate that to the current SC.

#31 | Posted by oneironaut

The recent history of the 14th amendment is that the 14th amendment can be completely ignored, as we ignored it when an insurrectionist was allowed on the ballot.

You weren't so worried about the constitution when trump attempted a coup, or ran for office again after that.

Posted by SpeakSoftly

No one was really worried about the constitution then.

Only pant -------, attempt to use it as leverage in the place of an actual argument.

#37 | Posted by oneironaut

No RUSSIANS or FASCISTS were worried about the constitution in that moment. Everyone else was.

To be clear this EO is a clear violation of the Constitution, hence my response.

#24 | Posted by BellRinger

You weren't so worried about the constitution when trump attempted a coup, or ran for office again after that.

The MSM is something else. Biden gave blanket pardons to his family and some political total allies and these people insinuate Trump may be setting a new norm. No matter how much you think you hate corporate media; it's not enough.

#4 | Posted by BellRinger

The new norm was set when trump attempted a coup. Anything after that is automatically a new precedent because everything is unprecedented now. We've never been in a situation where an entire party has pledged fealty to a con man who attempted a coup, and who protected anyone who broke the law for him with pardons.

That doesn't mean anything, the constitution changed to end slavery. The constitution is a living document.

#19 | Posted by oneironaut

Tell that to the morons who think the founders wanted everyday lunatics to have access to weapons of war.

Pray tell what is it with the DNA and commonality of homely women and politics? Fox News has beautiful women, while The View and MSNBC has well you can complete the thought.

#5 | Posted by Robson

Were the hot girls in your school the smartest ones?

Ugly people have to make their way in the world by developing skills and their brains. That's why fox is full of attractive morons.

But your brain is as stupid as trump's and you think if someone is attractive then you should listen to them.

Thing is that the majority of the money in that bill was not going for infrastructure. The dem play of naming a bill to get people behind it is the old bait-and-switch.

www.newsweek.com

#10 | Posted by MSgt

Can't even read your own link? It says only 6% went to roads and bridges. You realize there are many other types of infrastructure right? Or are you too dumb even for that?