The Muslims, by and large, are little more than stone-age thinkers but now equipped with modern weapons. However, their morality is literally no different than the Israelis. The Jewish Supremacy of Israel is used to justify any barbaric act they do - killing women and children? - no problem. A non-Jewish life is worth less than a Jewish fingernail.
We need to take a lesson from War Games - the only winning move is not to play. Let Iran and Israel fight to to the death as they will never peacefully coexist. We just need to remove the NEOCON/AIPAC influence within the US government.

#38 | Posted by ScottS

Look at the racist trotting out his same old KKK takes.

Iran doesn't murder apostates, gays, and women who exercise their human rights as part of their criminal justice system? But Israel does?

#37 | Posted by censored

Not generally no.

And they kind of ditched the morality squad.

Yav,
I hope you realize if we ever met in person I could bully you up a storm - swirlie, noogie, etc.

#59 | Posted by BellRinger

My god, this is the most pathetic thing I've read on here.

Even for Jeff, it's insanely pathetic.

It's like those kids photoshopping muscles on themselves on Facebook or trying post tough looking pictures of themselves...while wearing fedoras.

Trump: "I am the president who won't ---- on the floor!"
MAGAts: "Trump won't ---- on the floor! Isn't he the greatest?!"
Trump: *----s on floor*
MAGAts: "-------- on the floor was necessary! Isn't he the greatest?!"
Trump: *cleans up most of ---- on the floor*
MAGAts: "He cleaned up some of the ---- on the floor! Isn't he the greatest?!"

That's not entirely the decision.

It's they don't get due process to challenge where they are being sent. They still get due process to see IF they have to be sent.

In addition, the Court can still put in its order for removal that they be sent to a specific country...however, immigration courts never do this.

So yeah, it's pretty horrible. But that's MAGAt scum for you.

Need more liberal/MAGAt freakouts over the well-being of an Islamist theocracy that murders Christians/gays/women. I require more time to enjoy the horseshoe theory in action.

#29 | Posted by censored

Except for the word Islamic, I thought you were talking about Israel.

It looks like you don't know anything about Iran.

Iran has officially announced there is no ceasefire.

This is per Seyed Abbas Araghchi, Foreign Minister, Islamic Republic of Iran.

However, they said if Israel stops by 4 a.m. their time, they will stop.

Israel has not however stopped by the deadline.

Some Iranian forces are now denying there is a ceasefire.

There is also a report that Chinese planes have landed in Iran.

You're the same guy that defended Biden's senility, called them "deep fakes".

#16 | Posted by oneironaut

No, I didn't.

Get off your knees for Israel and wipe the ---- off your chin.

This is a huge L for Israel.

They wanted regime change: Big L
They wanted to set back Iran's nuclear ambitions 5 years: Big L
They wanted to prove they could protect themselves while hitting Iran: Big L

It's also a big L for Iran.

They wanted to prove it could defend itself: Big L
They lost a lot of top military leaders and scientists: Big L
They wanted to prove they could control their airspace: Big L

The biggest L is for Israel though. Israeli citizens understand they aren't safe if they attack Iran. Israel depleted it's Iron Dome missiles and even when it was working, it couldn't stop many of the Iranian missiles. And this is WITH help from the US and surrounding nations.

But it's yet to be seen if something else happened making it a bigger L for Iran as well.

In truth, this might just be Israel ageeing to a ceasefire so it can restock their defense missiles so they can restart the attacks.

Mark my words:

Something very strange is going on.

Both Israel and Iran are being very quiet. Trump says there is a ceasefire but Iran says there isn't one at first. Qatar has to confirm the ceasefire and negotiated it with Iran. Israel can keep bombing for a period of time. Trump says the ceasefire is permanent. No statements from any high ranking officials in Iran. Also Baghdad has been hit. The 60% enriched Uranium is still in Iran.

Something has happened that isn't hitting the news yet.

#6 How dare they. We must respond and retaliate against this unprovoked attack on US military bases.

#8 | Posted by visitor_

Unprovoked how? We bombed them first.

And they had the AUDACITY to let us know ahead of time that they were going to strike our base so we could be prepared and avoid casualties.

He didn't prepare anything for the retaliation.
#5 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT

He didn't have to, 4 days ago the US evacuated all of its aircraft from the Al-Udeid airbase in Qatar.
#8 | Posted by oneironaut

"The planes are safe. The soldiers are expendable!"
-MAGAt Oneironaut

This will be like Trump's first time when Iran retaliated against us for assassinating one of their generals.

First, there were no injuries.
Then, there were a few.
Then, months later, we admitted quietly when the public had moved on that 100 soldiers suffered traumatic brain injuries from the attack.

Soldiers lives don't matter to MAGAts.

Twoothy did. And it was in all caps.
Good luck trying to square that with his screaming when Trump scuttled Obama's first absurd Iran deal - "Trump just guaranteed Iran will be a nuclear power!!!!! *tears and sob*"
And here we are.

#15 | Posted by BellRinger

60% is legal.

How close were they to a nuclear bomb, Jeff?

Why did they restart enrichment after Trump ripped up Obama's Iran Deal?

Having a nuclear program is not the same as being close to having a nuclear bomb. Nor does it mean they are actually going to complete enrichment for a bomb.

But hey, I get it. You need to back Trump no matter what!

First theres no nuclear program. ...LOL
#6 | Posted by oneironaut
It's only 60% not that highly enriched
#8 | Posted by oneironaut

MAGAt summed up in two posts.

Don't forget we had to attack now because they were "days away" from a nuclear weapon.

Qatar saved our troops.

Not Donald Trump. He didn't prepare anything for the retaliation.

Republicans: "We better pull funding asap!"

Imagine being retarded enough to believe that this sickness is bound to a particular political party...

#4 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Based on continued arrests, it seems to be rather one sided...

@#1 ... The White House portrayed the strikes as a one-off action ...
While I hope this is the case, I will say, it remains to be seen.
#2 | Posted by LampLighter

The White House already walked that back.

It was "Obliterated" to "damaged" the nuclear facilities.

Now they are saying more strikes may be necessary. Trump is talking about regime change. And there has been an admission that nothing short of an invasion will stop Iran's efforts at nuclear weapons.

MAGA is cheering it on of course.

U.S. Officials Concede They Don't Know the Fate of Iran's Uranium Stockpile
www.nytimes.com

Amateur hour at the White House.

#389 | Posted by reinheitsgebot

That's every hour.

My god, they did a celebratory tweet to praise Hegseth for not leaking the attack.

For Christ's sake, MAGAt have the lowest standards on the planet for Trump and Co.

But what do you expect from Pedophile Supporters?

Posing an interesting question, where exactly would they invade from?

#4 | Posted by REDIAL

Turkey, Iraq, Pakistan and from overwater from Saudi Arabia.

That's Nuttyahoo's end game. FORCE the US to invade Iran.

Trump is stupid enough to fall for it. MAGAts are stupid enough to support it.

MAGAts are on their knees for Israel slurping away so expect the offical message to change in the next weeks or months from "We stopped them" to "We have to do more to stop them!" Rubio was already on TV this morning walking back the "We stopped them" message and Israel "suddenly" has new intelligence on where the Uranium was moved to.

No doubt the uranium was moved under hospitals, schools, and residential areas, right Israel? Right MAGAts?

BTW, Rubio said on TV today how close Iran was to a nuclear bomb isn't important. The intelligence doesn't matter. Why? Because we know they weren't close. They are trying to pre-empt the negative Iraq comparisons.

Peas in a Pod

google Hillary threatens Iran from 2008.
"If I am president, we will attack Iran."
"we would be able to totlly obliterate them"
#364 | Posted by shrimptacodan

362 | Posted by RightisTrite
it's not my job to give a piece
of ---- like you audio for you
#366 | Posted by shrimptacodan

Why won't Shrimp provide the audio?

Oh! Because the audio contains the question Hillary was answering!

The question is, "If Iran were to launch a nuclear attack on Israel, what would our response be?"

Shrimp is a liar sucking Israel's dick like the rest of MAGAt scum.