Ankush Khardori: The legal arguments for Trump's tariffs are weak, so he's arguing their rejection would bring ruin.
On Friday, challengers to President Donald Trump's tariffs filed a brief before the Supreme Court. They disagreed with the Trump administration that it has the legal authority to impose the tariffs, but agreed with it that the court should hear the case.
-- SCOTUSblog (@scotusblog.com) Sep 6, 2025 at 9:50 AM
[image or embed]
He doubled down on those claims on Tuesday while tacking on the transparently ridiculous assertion that the U.S. is "taking in $17 trillion ... because of tariffs."
#1 | Posted by Corky
Not that the GOP/MAGAts give a fudge about facts, but that would mean tarriffs exceed half our GDP. And, of course, we are the ones paying for it, to give tax cuts to billionaires.

Anthony Kennedy's son was Trump's moneylender at Deutsche Bank
June 29, 2018
Trump's months of praise of the senior Kennedy was all part of a campaign to assure him "that his judicial legacy would be in good hands should he step down at the end of the court's term that ended this week."
theweek.com
Drudge Retort Headlines
Trump Lost the Trade War to China (124 comments)
More Blame GOP and Trump than Democrats for Shutdown: Poll (31 comments)
Top Trump Officials Are Moving Onto Military Bases (31 comments)
Pentagon orders States to Form 'quick reaction forces' for 'crowd control' (25 comments)
Trump Orders the Pentagon to Resume Nuclear Testing (15 comments)
DOJ Indicts Dem Candidate for Congress for ICE Protest (14 comments)
Quiet Supersonic X-59 Jet Soars in First Test Flight (12 comments)
HHS Sec. Robert Kennedy Jr Flip Flops on Tylenol (11 comments)
Putin Defies Trump Again on Nuclear Test (11 comments)
Texas Supreme Court Rules Judges Can Refuse Same Sex Marriages (10 comments)