Ankush Khardori: The legal arguments for Trump's tariffs are weak, so he's arguing their rejection would bring ruin.
On Friday, challengers to President Donald Trump's tariffs filed a brief before the Supreme Court. They disagreed with the Trump administration that it has the legal authority to impose the tariffs, but agreed with it that the court should hear the case.
-- SCOTUSblog (@scotusblog.com) Sep 6, 2025 at 9:50 AM
[image or embed]
He doubled down on those claims on Tuesday while tacking on the transparently ridiculous assertion that the U.S. is "taking in $17 trillion ... because of tariffs."
#1 | Posted by Corky
Not that the GOP/MAGAts give a fudge about facts, but that would mean tarriffs exceed half our GDP. And, of course, we are the ones paying for it, to give tax cuts to billionaires.

Anthony Kennedy's son was Trump's moneylender at Deutsche Bank
June 29, 2018
Trump's months of praise of the senior Kennedy was all part of a campaign to assure him "that his judicial legacy would be in good hands should he step down at the end of the court's term that ended this week."
theweek.com
Drudge Retort Headlines
Sen. Mark Kelly Faces Pentagon Investigation (124 comments)
Nearly 1 in 3 Expect to Slip Into Debt This Holiday Season (96 comments)
Comey, James Cases Dismissed (48 comments)
World Losing Climate War; Fragile Cop30 Deal Keeps Up Fight (25 comments)
Republicans Are Fleeing Remaining Trump Term (21 comments)
DOGE 'doesn't exist' with Eight Months Left on its Charter (17 comments)
Trump to Immediately End Protections for Minnesota Somalis (17 comments)
JD Vance's Top Donor Suggests Pope Leo XIV Is Antichrist (14 comments)
Trump Planned to Roll Out a Healthcare Plan: GOP Balks (14 comments)
Two Texas Men Indicted in Plot to Take over Haitian Isle for Slaves (14 comments)