First of all, Mamdani played Trump, and he knows how to do it again.

Second, Trump is upset he will have to pay taxes on his properties in NYC which aren't his permanent residence.

More like.

He's flooding his diapers again.

I will never understand why people are so obsessed with Trump's body parts, much less his nether regions.

Are you considering his feces filled diapers as part of his body or his nether regions?

Take a deep breath and get back to me.

I mean.

Trump is full of shht.

You may be onto something by insisting his feces are part of his body and nether region.

Let us know what you discover once you finish consuming his shht.

"We're talking about a federal administration that has spent close to $30B killing thousands of people at a time when working class people across this country cannot afford the bare minimum and to be told a city run grocery store is implausible, but spending more than $500M a day to kill people in Iran and Lebanon is not only plausible, but necessary - it speaks to a broken kind of politics"

-Zohran Mamdani

How are you today, old friend?

Doing well, thanks! 82 and beautiful here today in the San Fernando Valley.

How has your day been?

Pretty sure the preferred option is the Non AIPAC, Non Republican candidate.

If none are available, the democratic candidate will have to suffice.

But, I see nothing wrong with sharing information about a political candidate's policies and who's paying them.

Large donors demand large returns on their investments.

As for Abigail Spanberger, despite AIPAC's contributions to her and her prior voting record in Congress, I'm very fond of everything she's done while governing Virginia.

Hopefully she sees the value of distancing herself from AIPAC and continues to put America first.

#21 | POSTED BY A_FRIEND

Are you being dense on purpose?

Re read this sentence a until it it makes:

" ... the preferred option is the Non AIPAC, Non Republican candidate."

You seem grouchy.

Go eat a sandwich and take a walk.

You have to be a unicorn not to accept money from AIPAC?

What a weird perspective.

We've been at war in the Middle East for the past 26 years on the behest of Israel.

We pay them with our tax dollars and they use those tax dollars to buy our politicians who spend our tax dollars on more wars in the Middle East instead of focusing on America.

#27

You really are trying hard not to understand.

I wrote:

" ... the preferred option is the Non AIPAC, Non Republican candidate.

If none are available, the democratic candidate will have to suffice."

So. Here's how this breaks down.

The preferred option means, "the candidate I'd preferred voting for is one not funded by AIPAC and is not a Republican."

The second sentence then amends the first to clarify if such a candidate is not on the ballot, the democratic candidate on the ballot would suffice.

I mean. I could also vote third party. But I'd have to weigh the weight of such decisions.

With "allies" like you ...

... America would be trillions wealthier.

--- America, you know best.
Right?
#30 | POSTED BY A_FRIEND

Israel is way ahead of me.

This entire discussion is a non sequitur.

Democrats need to attract voters.

I'm not subscribing to cult mentality just because republicans have.

The reason Americans can't have universal healthcare and education is because neither party cares about Americans and voters are kept scared by being threatened to either vote for the party who mainly represents the rich and keeping some of our tax dollars helping us, or get stuck with the party who only represents the rich and openly loots the nation.