Advertisement
Banned at ‘Guernica’
The progressive literary magazine sees a staff revolt and retracts an essay on empathy and complexity in Israel/Gaza.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
Gal_Tuesday
Joined 2003/07/01Visited 2024/05/15
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Google accidentally deleted $125 billion pension fundaccount (4 comments) ...
Tesla Storing Unsold Inventory at Abandoned Malls (16 comments) ...
Why far-right groups are disrupting US campus protests (6 comments) ...
Alabama Senator Katie Intros Bill to Create Fed Database of Pregnant Women (54 comments) ...
Is RFK Jr's VP Pick the Most Dangerous Woman in America? (2 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
I don't know how much interest this will have for folks on the DR, but I first heard about the issue earlier in the week and read a few articles on the topic, including this one:
An elite literary journal imploded over an essay about the war--because it dared to humanize Israelis as well as Palestinians
Guernica staff resigned en masse after a co-publisher declared a piece by a Hebrew and Arabic translator an apologia for Zionism'
forward.com
I don't understand the rationale behind cancelling Chen's article. Beware of purity ponies of all stripes.
#1 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-03-15 10:02 PM | Reply
Did these people see the painting?
#2 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-03-16 10:02 PM | Reply
Interesting. I've never heard of Guernica. The Nation wrote quite a smack-down of their hypocrisy in taking down the essay: "If this is what passes for the left today, God help us. Guernica's cringeworthy backpedaling is redolent of the self-denunciations of Stalin's purge victims or the coerced linguistic self-flagellations of academics during Mao's Cultural Revolution...Maybe if the magazine had a different name, say Free Speech Sucks or Too Lazy to Think the Issue Through, this behavior wouldn't be so loathsome and hypocritical."
Ouch.
There is a lot of thought in The Nation's take on this: www.thenation.com
The original link Gal provided also has the link to the original essay. I'm relinking it here: web.archive.org
Thank you, Gal.
#3 | Posted by YAV at 2024-03-16 11:14 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2
Yav, thanks for posting the Nation article. I hadn't seen it. Glad to see so many calling out the Guernica editors.
#4 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-03-17 10:15 AM | Reply
Anyone ever hear of Guernica? Guess I'm not an elite progressive.
#5 | Posted by mattm at 2024-03-18 10:20 AM | Reply
Post a commentComments are closed for this entry.Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable
Comments are closed for this entry.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable