Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, June 04, 2024

A Tesla shareholder filed a lawsuit on Thursday accusing CEO Elon Musk of insider trading when he sold over $7.5 billion of shares of the electric car maker in late 2022, saying the billionaire entrepreneur sold the shares before potentially disappointing production and delivery numbers were made public.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

He's as dirty as a Tesla "truck" after a light rain.

#1 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-06-03 09:15 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

... The lawsuit also accused Tesla's directors of breaching their fiduciary duty by allowing Musk to sell the shares. ...

This seems to be a recurring theme.

Chancery Finds Tesla Board Breached Fiduciary Duties (February 2024)
corpgov.law.harvard.edu

... In Tornetta v. Musk (Jan. 30, 2024), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in a post-trial decision, ruled that the directors of Tesla, Inc. breached their fiduciary duties when, in 2018, they awarded Elon Musk, Tesla's CEO and founder, a ten-year performance-based equity compensation plan with an estimated maximum value at one time of $55.8 billion. The court ordered rescission of the entire plan, eliminating all of the compensation Musk had earned under the plan. The court emphasized that Musk's preexisting 21.9% equity stake in the company in any event had "provided him tens of billions of dollars for his efforts" that had increased the value of the company.

The court found that: (i) Musk controlled Tesla, at least with respect to the compensation plan; (ii) therefore, the compensation plan was a conflicted-controller transaction invoking entire fairness review; (iii) although the plan was made subject to approval of a majority-of-the-minority stockholders, the burden to prove entire fairness remained with the defendants because the disclosure to stockholders was materially flawed, preventing a fully informed vote; and (iv) the defendants did not prove that the compensation plan was fair as to price or process. We anticipate that the decision will be appealed.

Key Points

- - - The court viewed Tesla's Compensation Committee as having simply given Musk whatever he wanted. ...


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-06-03 09:19 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

He's not the hero we want, but he's the hero we deserve.

#3 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-06-04 07:57 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort