Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, June 13, 2025

(CNN) " Shortly before sunrise in Iran on Friday, Israel launched the first strikes of its operation against the regime's nuclear program. That operation, called "Rising Lion," had two prongs: Heavy airstrikes against at least one of Iran's enrichment sites, and more targeted strikes in Tehran to decapitate the regime's military leadership. It aimed to halt what Israel said was Tehran's rapid progress in developing nuclear weapons. Tehran, which insists its nuclear program is peaceful, says it has "no option but to respond."

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

There's this OpEd ...

Netanyahu attacked Iran to avert an existential threat'. He may have made it worse
www.theguardian.com

... Israel has eliminated many of the brains behind Tehran's nuclear programme. But don't expect the regime to back down

This is a war 30 years in the making. Benjamin Netanyahu was talking about the threat of an Iranian nuclear bomb back in the 1990s and he has scarcely let up since. For decades he has believed that a nuclear Iran would represent the one truly existential threat to Israel and that military force is the only sure way to prevent it. Several times during the many years in which Netanyahu has sat in the prime minister's chair, an all-out strike on Iran's nuclear facilities has been weighed up, debated and planned for. In the early hours of this morning, it finally happened.

Netanyahu will be pleased with the early results, including the elimination of key Iranian military commanders and nuclear scientists. But the ultimate consequences could look very different. By his actions, he may only have accelerated the very danger he has feared for so long.

It's not hard to see why Israel's PM struck and struck now. The motive remains the same as it ever was, with Netanyahu's statement overnight invoking the darkest chapter in Jewish history to insist that Israel would never allow itself to be vulnerable to a "nuclear holocaust". But the timing was down, in part, to the fact that the Iranian regime is in a state of strategic weakness. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-06-13 07:51 PM | Reply

@#1 ... the fact that the Iranian regime is in a state of strategic weakness ...

While I am currently ambivalent whether or not the current Iranian regime is in a state of weakness, I have to ask...

Is the problem the state of the regime, or the state of the state's nuclear program?


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-06-13 07:53 PM | Reply

Regardless of whether the regime is weak or not, killing a bunch of random innocent civilians won't accomplish anything.

#3 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-13 07:55 PM | Reply

Clownshack want's an Israeli missel up his Iranian ass.

#4 | Posted by fortfisher at 2025-06-13 08:07 PM | Reply

Are you proposing to me?

#5 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-13 08:10 PM | Reply

@#3 ... killing a bunch of random innocent civilians won't accomplish anything. ...

Was PM Netanyahu intentionally targeting civilians (as Pres Putin seems to do)? Or was Iran ~hiding~ it's leaders in civilian targets?

If the latter, why did Iran intentionally put its civilians at risk?

#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-06-13 08:13 PM | Reply

hiding~ it's leaders in civilian targets?

The idea that when you go home you're hiding, is nothing more than an excuse for killing innocent people.

It's brilliant propaganda cooked up to excuse Israel flattening buildings full of people in hopes of killing one person.

#7 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-13 11:10 PM | Reply

@#7 ... It's brilliant propaganda cooked up to excuse Israel flattening buildings full of people in hopes of killing one person. ...

Got a link for this current instance?

thx.

#8 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-06-13 11:23 PM | Reply

"Was PM Netanyahu intentionally targeting civilians (as Pres Putin seems to do)? Or was Iran ~hiding~ its leaders in civilian targets?"

I would say neither. The leaders were specifically targeted, and they were living (not hiding) in residential areas. Hard not to end up with unintended civilian casualties when targeting people who live in populated areas.

#9 | Posted by Miranda7 at 2025-06-14 12:38 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort