Ukraine updates: US sanctions major Russian oil companies
The Trump administration announced more sanctions on two major state-run Russian oil companies, a day after plans for a potential meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin fell through.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
LampLighter
Joined 2013/04/13Visited 2025/10/23
Status: user
MORE STORIES
New JPMorgan skyscraper underlines NYC office comeback (1 comments) ...
China’s new five-year plan has the world’s attention. (2 comments) ...
Ukraine updates: US sanctions major Russian oil companies (9 comments) ...
Teachers hate it, kids love it: psychology of "6-7" craze (3 comments) ...
Hardline Takaichi to Shatter Japan's Glass Ceiling (5 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More from the article ...
... The Trump administration announced more sanctions on two major state-run Russian oil companies. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent teased the news before it was officially announced, telling Fox Business, "President Putin has not come to the table in an honest and forthright manner, as we'd hoped." ...
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent teased the news before it was officially announced, telling Fox Business, "President Putin has not come to the table in an honest and forthright manner, as we'd hoped." ...
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-22 09:56 PM | Reply
@#1 ... as we'd hoped. ...
Is the Trump admin finally admitting that Pres Putin has been playing his sock puppet in the Oval Office?
#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-22 09:57 PM | Reply
Peace Prize announcement in 352 days.
#3 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-10-22 10:34 PM | Reply
He's been resisting even Republican Sens efforts to have him do this since he's been in Office.
It's very little very late.
#4 | Posted by Corky at 2025-10-22 10:37 PM | Reply
@#4 ... It's very little very late. ...
Yup.
Not only that, it comes after Pres Trump looked to have basically given the sovereign country of Ukraine to Pres Trump in his prior comments.
So, yeah, these sanctions are too little, too late.
What Pres trump needs to do, if he truly supports Ukraine, is provide the arms to Ukraine that will cause Pres Putin to take notice.
That's the start.
imo, Until that happens, Pres Trump just looks like a sock-puppet of Pres Putin.
#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-22 10:45 PM | Reply
Trump was saying at a Presser today that WE needed those Tomahawk missiles, so Ukraine couldn't have them. Presumably we need them to fire on Venezuela and Greenland.
#6 | Posted by Corky at 2025-10-22 10:50 PM | Reply
@#6 ... Trump was saying at a Presser today that WE needed those Tomahawk missiles, so Ukraine couldn't have them. ...
Yeah, he seems to be wavering in his reasons. An indication to me that he may just be making excuses...
Trump shoots down sending Ukraine 'highly complex' Tomahawk missiles: 'Tremendous learning curve'
... President Trump on Wednesday appeared to rule out providing Ukraine with Tomahawk cruise missiles, arguing that the long-range weapons are too complex for Kyiv to deploy without substantial US training. "The problem with the Tomahawk is -- a lot of people don't know -- It'll take a minimum of six months, usually a year, to learn how to use," Trump told reporters during an Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. "The only way a Tomahawk is going to be shot is if we shot it," the president added. ...
"The problem with the Tomahawk is -- a lot of people don't know -- It'll take a minimum of six months, usually a year, to learn how to use," Trump told reporters during an Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte.
"The only way a Tomahawk is going to be shot is if we shot it," the president added. ...
#7 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-22 10:58 PM | Reply
@#7 ... The problem with the Tomahawk is -- a lot of people don't know ...
Apparently Pres Trump, as well, seems to be among those people who don't know.
So why did he intimate that he would send them if he now seems to admit he is clueless about their deployment?
#8 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-22 11:01 PM | Reply
Presumably we need them to fire on Venezuela and Greenland.
Or sand dunes in Yemen. Shooting down $300 drones with $2 Million SM-2 missiles is good business for Raytheon, but not good for maintaining stockpiles.
#9 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-10-22 11:07 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy