Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, May 15, 2025

The judge said that the government had offered no evidence that Badar Khan Suri represented a national security threat, and that efforts to deport him violated the First Amendment.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

A judge in Virginia ordered the release of Georgetown University scholar Badar Khan Suri, marking at least the third time a detained student or academic targeted by the Trump administration because of their protest activity or affiliation was released from immigration detention. cnn.it/4dlC30o

[image or embed]

-- CNN (@cnn.com) May 14, 2025 at 1:11 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"The judge said that the government had offered no evidence"

The government has to show evidence?
Woke.

#1 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-15 11:43 AM | Reply

Ha ha.

Another False Arrest lawsuit.

Trumpy ain't got time for this.

Seriously

Have you seen how old tired and sleepy he seems lately?

Trying to destroy democracy is hard work.

You say a little thing like "We are thinking about eliminating habeas corpus" and everyone gets all flippy floppy!!

#2 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-15 12:19 PM | Reply

When are they going to whip this out?

H. Rept. 104-828 - ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION REFORM AND IMMIGRANT RESPONSIBILITY ACT OF 1996
www.congress.gov

Former President Bill Clinton signed a 1996 law establishing expedited removal, a fast-track deportation that allows for deportations without going before an immigration judge.

#3 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-05-15 12:57 PM | Reply

"When are they going to whip this out?"

When in doubt. Whip it out!

The law also established a procedure for expedited removal, by which an INS officer, rather than an immigration judge, may order the removal of an individual. This expedited procedure applied to individuals at a port of entry and those unable to prove that they had been residing in the country continuously for two years. Individuals intending to apply for asylum were exempted from this provision.

And you think that maga maroons don't already know about and are using this law whenever they can? They'd go back to the 1700s if they could find a law from that era to harass immigrants with.

Regardless.. It is still due process and does not eliminate habeas corpus.

So good luck with that nonsense.

#4 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-15 01:25 PM | Reply

and those unable to prove that they had been residing in the country continuously for two years.
#4

So many of the Biden ignorees qualify.
"it is still due process" Right!

#5 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-05-15 01:52 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort