Advertisement
MIT Creates an AI Labor Index as AI Invades Human Economies
The organization's Iceberg Index' is designed to track the different types of AI agents now doing work once conducted by people.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
LampLighter
Joined 2013/04/13Visited 2025/12/07
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Sen Kelly: Hegseth will 'take a hike' on court martial (1 comments) ...
Weekend music thread ... (9 comments) ...
National push to open access to sickle cell gene therapies (1 comments) ...
Passkeys are the new hotness in MFA (2 comments) ...
Russias' Putin Summit Talks with India's Modi in Delhi (20 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
An MIT study finds that AI can replace 11.7% of the US labor market, or ~$1.2T in wages, based on the "Iceberg Index", which measures job automation potential (MacKenzie Sigalos/CNBC) Main Link | Techmeme Permalink -- Techmeme (@techmeme.com) Nov 27, 2025 at 2:31 AM
An MIT study finds that AI can replace 11.7% of the US labor market, or ~$1.2T in wages, based on the "Iceberg Index", which measures job automation potential (MacKenzie Sigalos/CNBC) Main Link | Techmeme Permalink
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More from the article ...
... The "Iceberg Index" counts the different types of AI agents conducting work previously done by human labor. The initial index numbers indicate that just 13,000 agents could expose 151 million human workers, or about 11.7% of the workforce population, to job or wage losses. The research paper said the AI agent population -- which could ultimately overtake the human population -- needs to be quantified. The metric provides a snapshot of how the AI era is shifting productivity, skill development, and job creation and development. Because existing employment numbers from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics look backward, not forward, an AI job index is needed, the researchers said. They argued the data offers a forward-looking view how AI will replace workers and helps leaders plan for skills development and investment planning. "The labor market is evolving faster than current data systems can capture," the researchers said, adding that "existing workforce planning frameworks were designed for human-only economies." ...
The research paper said the AI agent population -- which could ultimately overtake the human population -- needs to be quantified. The metric provides a snapshot of how the AI era is shifting productivity, skill development, and job creation and development.
Because existing employment numbers from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics look backward, not forward, an AI job index is needed, the researchers said. They argued the data offers a forward-looking view how AI will replace workers and helps leaders plan for skills development and investment planning.
"The labor market is evolving faster than current data systems can capture," the researchers said, adding that "existing workforce planning frameworks were designed for human-only economies." ...
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-04 08:36 PM | Reply
From what I can tell, AI is stupid. If I'm going to have a stupid employee, why shouldn't I have a human being who I can at least yell at and who might take personal responsibility?
#2 | Posted by Zed at 2025-12-05 09:14 AM | Reply
From what I can tell, AI is stupid.
#2 | Posted by Zed at 2025-12-05 09:14 AM | Reply | Flag
Because you're not very smart yourself. Our country just allocated around $500,000,000,000 to AI development, I don't think what they're working on is stupid. It may not be what you want once it takes center stage, but it's not stupid. You probably look at things like Chat GPT or Grok and think that's AI. It's not, It's just a sophisticated search engine.
#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-12-06 01:09 PM | Reply
Our country just allocated around $500,000,000,000 to AI development
Our "country." You mean Meta, Google, Microsoft, etc.? Or do you mean Uncle Sam?
#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-12-06 01:39 PM | Reply
You probably look at things like Chat GPT or Grok and think that's AI.
#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds
The point of human society is humanity.
Better to give a man a job than a machine. The man knows how to value it.
#5 | Posted by Zed at 2025-12-06 01:52 PM | Reply
-AI is proficient in math and language, unlike many of our school DEI 'graduates'. -AI does not fake back injuries -AI does not sh**t the place up
#6 | Posted by sit_goodboy at 2025-12-07 08:45 AM | Reply
AI is proficient in math and language, unlike many of our school DEI 'graduates'. -AI does not fake back injuries -AI does not sh**t the place up
#6 | Posted by sit_goodboy
Ah, so you understand the righteousness in losing your job.
Good boy.
#7 | Posted by Zed at 2025-12-07 08:56 AM | Reply
-AI does not fake back injuries -AI does not sh**t the place up #6 | Posted by sit_goodboy
A real danger of AI is people like you, who think computers can't make mistakes!
Vibe Coding Fiasco: AI Agent Goes Rogue, Deletes Company's Entire Database www.pcmag.com
#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-12-07 09:40 AM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy