Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, May 03, 2026

Kathleen Naranjo was almost eight years into paying off her portion of $50,000 in student loans when a federal appeals court last month ended one of the most affordable loan repayment plans in history.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

As a Pitt fan, I'm glad to see him use his platform as Dr. Langdon to speak out. Student debt is crushing people whose only sin was advancing their education. The system is broken--and the Trump admin has made it worse by jacking up loan payments by hundreds of dollars a month.

[image or embed]

-- Elizabeth Warren (@warren.senate.gov) Apr 30, 2026 at 5:21 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... Kathleen Naranjo was almost eight years into paying off her portion of $50,000 in student loans when a federal appeals court last month ended one of the most affordable loan repayment plans in history. That Biden administration-era plan had reduced her monthly payments to $92 and she was working toward the day when the remaining balance would be forgiven after 10 years of payments doing public service as a nurse.

Now amid soaring gas and food prices, Ms. Naranjo is enrolling in her next best option. Her monthly payment will triple, scrambling her personal finances at a moment when she is hunting for her first house.

"That's the only way that I can really do it, otherwise I'm going to be paying this loan until I die," she says.

More than 7 million borrowers who had been enrolled in the income-based Saving on A Valuable Education (SAVE) plan like Ms. Naranjo have been told that beginning July 1, they will have 90 days to get into a new loan repayment plan or be routed into one by the government.

The SAVE plan arrived in 2023 as millions of student borrowers were emerging from a three-year pause in payments during the pandemic. It was meant to chip away at the now more than $1.8 trillion in total student debt held by borrowers across the country by tying payments to income.

The plan lowered payments to $0 for many of the lowest earners -- preventing unpaid interest from accumulating and offering earlier loan forgiveness.

But many critics charged that American taxpayers were being saddled with debt. Republican-governed states challenged the executive action and ultimately the courts stopped it because Congress had not approved it. ...




#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-03 01:30 AM | Reply

The math isn't mathing on their sob story.

She's unduly financially burned by a $300 monthly student loan payment...but is shopping for a home in a market where average prices are $550,000? In the current environment, that would be what, a $3,000 to $3,500 monthly mortgage payment?

Don't get me wrong, this administration is screwing over people who dared to get educated and are turning them, like everything else, into a cash flow for the government to shovel into their pockets. But I would think a better example of the negatives of the policies wouldn't be hard to find.

#2 | Posted by jpw at 2026-05-03 02:04 PM | Reply

"The math isn't mathing on their sob story."

It was until Trump changed the math.

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-03 02:08 PM | Reply

"She's unduly financially burned by a $300 monthly student loan payment"

Well it used to be $92, but more importantly, the real financial value was the promise of loan forgiveness after ten years of public service.

As you probably are aware, people in public service usually don't make a lot of money.

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-03 02:11 PM | Reply

- people in public service

Those people are chumps and Lewzers in Trump's America.

And are clearly being shown that's the new reality.

#5 | Posted by Corky at 2026-05-03 02:37 PM | Reply

It was until Trump changed the math.

#3 | Posted by snoofy

I know Trump changed the math and I'm well aware it's not in borrower's favor. In fact, it comes across to me as punitive, almost as if they want to punish people for daring to get an education.

However, if she's seriously looking for a home in a community that has an average home price of $550,000, then that $180 difference is either not as burdensome as she's saying or she's not in a position to be looking to buy a new home.

#6 | Posted by jpw at 2026-05-03 04:11 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort