#3. Of course I did nothing of the sort but you can't be bothered to read the linked article, so ...

#1. Fortunately in a surprisingly bipartisan fashion Congress passed appropriations for new nuclear power plants and Biden signed it.

In those conditions it should perform well, at least in theory.

#12. They are so heavy they t seems like they would struggle in wet mud.

#1. Biden revoked Trump's security clearance n 2021.

According to Trump, Musk and Hegseth, China wasn't even part of the meeting topics. It was about tech and innovation. Are they lying? It's possible. Are these anonymous sources lying? Also possible. I tend to put a bit more credence in the word of people who go on the record as opposed to anonymous sources. But this tracks with how NYT covers politics.

"We lost an election therefore it's a crisis! *sob*"

You people are unintentionally hilarious.

There are a lot of laws I disagree with that pass Constitutional muster.

Undoubtedly you hate certain states that have passed laws banning males from competing in women's sports but I don't think you will try to make the argument that said laws are unconstitutional.

This is getting tedious. I opposed DOMA but didn't and don't think it was unconstitutional.

That word salad would make Kamala Harris proud.

I think it's a great nation and always has been. OTOH you regard this country as evil and irredeemably racist.

" Please tell us, what has happened to the quintile distribution of household income since the Department of Education was created?

#16 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2025-03-20 06:35 PM | FLAG: "

You just unwittingly made an argument for dismantling it.

You have it 180 degrees backward but you keep being you.

I hate auto correct.

I think their reasoning was wrong.

Some laws are bad laws, but not unconstitutional.

DOMA falls into this category. On a personal level I was glad SCOTUS killed it but I think their reasons J6 was wrong.

This level of nuance may be far beyond your barista-level of understanding of how things work to grasp.

Since the ED was created all student performative metrics have gone down.

" You have stated repeatedly that gay marriage should not have been legalized.

#296 | POSTED BY SNOOFY AT 2025-03-20 06:04 PM | FLAG: "

Nope. Never. You lying sack of shht.

While I support this from a practical standpoint ED was created by Congress which means dismantling it requires a bill to be passed and signed.

This EO will get smacked down in the courts. Hard. Trump will have egg on his face. Cheer up, Democrats. Your party is an absolute disaster right now but if this administration keeps doubling down on unforced errors like tariffs and this and being the party of "Not Trump" may be enough in 2026 and 2028.

" Gal's the best, isn't she?

#24 | POSTED BY YAV AT 2025-03-19 02:32 PM | FLAG: | NEWSWORTHY 2

I want TwinPac back, too"

You're fantasizing about a threesome with two women? I though you are gay. Maybe a tad bi?

Sycophant clearly adores this guy.

The WH had pride lighting for a month. You lefties cheered it and thus forfeited your ability to complain about this.

Cactus holds a lo5 of water. They should tap it.

If we remove politics this is a good thing, right?

So., if I understand you correctly - Student loans are fraudulent and the taxpayers should fund them.

I hope my understanding is wrong.

"All of the forgiveness programs enacted after the SCOTUS decision was well within the power of a POTUS to force a government agency to perform as intended by their statutory mandate under federal law."

On a case-by-case basis only after proven that the lender violated lending law and/or mislead a borrower. It was never set up for any kind of blanket forgiveness like it was some kind of class-action lawsuit.

"yes,I think the broad forgiveness as overreach and should have been prohibited by SCOTUS;"

Well, that's a crucial piece of clarification.