Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, March 20, 2025

A professor CUNY history professor named Angus Johnston posted a pretty good thread over at Bluesky yesterday about the current Constitutional crisis. I think he nails it perfectly. I've pasted his handful of posts together here for readability purposes

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

As always, not a lawyer, but one thing that leaps out at me about how things are going down in the courts right now is that the US court system is not designed to be responsive to a crisis like this one. A crisis like this one is not what it's FOR. Courts are designed to answer small, narrow, discrete questions. But our current crisis isn't an accumulation of small, narrow, discrete questions, and trying to get the courts to solve it is like trying to empty a bucket of sand with a pair of tweezers.

The constitution has a system in place for a crisis like this, and that system is impeachment and removal from office. That's the mechanism by which this kind of a crisis is supposed to be resolved. Removing that mechanism"as Republican congressional majorities have made it clear that there is literally nothing this administration could do that would make them even contemplate impeachment"is the equivalent of cutting a car's brake lines.

You might be able to stop such a car, there are things you can do to try to stop such a car, but the way you're supposed to stop the car"the mechanism in the car that stops it when it needs to stop"no longer exists. And so every time a federal judge acts in a way that seems weird or unsuited to the moment, the first thing I try to remember is that they're being asked to empty a bucket of sand with a pair of tweezers.

I think this is absolutely right.

A critical part of American jurisprudence is that the matters to be adjudicated need to be narrow and the need to be precise. You don't throw everything but the kitchen sink in complaints. You present discrete disputes to the tribunal, not a laundry list of broad-based beefs. The system does not handle the latter very well for a host of reasons that, while a bit cumbersome to detail here, is something lawyers and judges know very well.

There has been very little focus on Republicans in Congress right now. Some of them are getting heat at town halls back home, but none of the commentary or general outrage, certainly at the national level, is really aimed at them. They no doubt love that fact, of course, because they all know that (a) everything that's happening right now is illegal as all get-out; (b) it is their job, pursuant to the Constitution, to put a stop to it; but (c) they have absolutely no desire to do that because they consider the people and institutions that are being harmed their enemy and those who are benefitting from this chaos their friends. And that's before you get to the part about how they're all cowards and are afraid to upset Trump.

I hope we'll eventually find our way out of this crisis, but no matter how that plays out, one thing is absolutely certain: Trump has been able to assume and exercise dictatorial powers because the Republican-controlled Congress has allowed him to do so.

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Traitors, the lot of today's Republicans!

They swore an oath to the Constitution they instead use to wipe their butts with.

#1 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2025-03-20 11:59 AM | Reply

"the US court system is not designed to be responsive to a crisis like this one."

Never let a crisis go to waste!
--George Soros, according to Republicans.

#2 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-20 12:15 PM | Reply

Funny how all of a sudden Democrats are concerned about the constitution.

#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-03-20 12:22 PM | Reply

Funny how all of a sudden Democrats are concerned about the constitution.

#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Funny how Republicans suddenly think the President can ignore court orders.

#4 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-03-20 12:26 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 2

Funny, how all of a sudden Republicans aren't concerned about the constitution.

What's up with that?

#5 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-20 12:26 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

Funny how Republicans suddenly think the President can ignore court orders.

Given the article, what court order was ignored? Why did Trump ignore it?

Funny, how all of a sudden Republicans aren't concerned about the constitution.

What? What is Trumps response to this? If you don't understand his position, you can hardly claim you understand anyones position on the constitution.

I don't see this any different than how Biden finally came across a law/act that allowed him to pay off student loans, nothing wrong with that.

Trump found a law that enabled him to clean up Bidens border mess allowing terrorist organizations into the country.

#6 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-03-20 12:36 PM | Reply

Yeah...funny how all of a sudden Dogeanistas evidently no longer believe our Constitution applies to them. Perhaps Lefty can provide us all with some actual confirmation to his knee-jerk bias.

#7 | Posted by dutch46 at 2025-03-20 12:42 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

If you don't mind that the Pres is a lying piece of human garbage with no redeemable character qualities; a criminal, a rapist, and a traitor to the Constitution... then you might be in a Cult.

#8 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-20 02:23 PM | Reply | Funny: 2 | Newsworthy 1

#8 | Posted by Corky: You stole that from Foxworthy! (Those idiots above wouldn't know a closet from a cult.)

#9 | Posted by Yodagirl at 2025-03-20 04:26 PM | Reply

Foxworthy stole from Corky. Fact!

#10 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-03-20 04:56 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

A US federal judge has blocked the enforcement of President Donald Trump's executive order barring transgender people from serving in the country's military.

US District Judge Ana Reyes of Washington, D.C. ruled on Tuesday that the ban is "soaked in animus" and violates the equal protection clause due to discriminating based on transgender status and sex.

"Its language is unabashedly demeaning, its policy stigmatizes transgender persons as inherently unfit, and its conclusions bear no relation to fact," she wrote in her decision.

Reyes, appointed by former US President Joe Biden, has delayed the effect of her preliminary injunction until Friday so that the Justice Department could challenge it at the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

-Great news! Random leftist activist DEI judges can replace the current costly military chain of command!

#11 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-03-20 05:20 PM | Reply

#10

It was merely a 5 finger discount.

#11

Funny to think that Republicans used to be the Party of Law and Order... when now they are the Party of a Lying Criminal Traitor President.

Who is undermining democracy at home and abroad, and fervently supporting a mass murderer in Moscow, while demolishing the Western Alliance.

#12 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-20 05:34 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

#12 | Posted by Corky
Your nested delusional talking point are truly unassailable.
It was real, in your mind

#13 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-03-20 05:55 PM | Reply

It IS real, full time, in the real world. Corky described exactly what the repubs have become (I was one once, in the Reagan years) and what our traitor president is doing. Anything else YOU might come up with is delusional and traitorous. Go back down to the basement and scratch the night away.

#14 | Posted by Yodagirl at 2025-03-20 06:36 PM | Reply

#13

Wow, given a chance to make an actual argument, and you blew it bigtime.

Maybe next time... as if.

#15 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-20 06:45 PM | Reply

"We lost an election therefore it's a crisis! *sob*"

You people are unintentionally hilarious.

#16 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-03-20 06:57 PM | Reply

"We lost an election"

This is not about the election, but you're right, we sure did.

This is about the regulatory disassembly of the Republic.

You used to have opinions on thingsile this. Now you don't.

#17 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-20 07:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

A US federal judge has blocked the enforcement of President Donald Trump's executive order barring transgender people from serving in the country's military.

Trump supporters seem to just be discovering how the American government functions.

And they hate it!

How dare King Trump's unconstitutional Executive Orders be challenged!!!

#18 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-20 07:20 PM | Reply

The author's spot-on metaphor has been riding around in my head all day, so much so I've been annoying my more liturgically-inclined acquaintances to give the article a perusal.

#19 | Posted by dutch46 at 2025-03-20 07:41 PM | Reply

#18
Again,
Wake me up when one of your judges injunctions an air strike or bombing raid.

#20 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-03-20 08:22 PM | Reply

dutch

you talk like a flag and your chits all we todd it.

#21 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-03-20 08:24 PM | Reply

20-21

Has nada, as predicted.

#22 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-20 09:25 PM | Reply

Trump has been able to assume and exercise dictatorial powers because the Republican-controlled Congress has allowed him to do so.

That is why democrats in congress have to say to their republican colleagues that they can no longer be "friends" if they are only going to air their grievances in private because to much is at stake. Long standing relationships may fracture but to much is at stake. The public needs to know where each of its representatives stand so as to assess whether or not to give them their vote because to much is at stake.

#23 | Posted by FedUpWithPols at 2025-03-21 06:48 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Hey Itchy...How about you try that again...perhap in something close to proper English this time?

#24 | Posted by dutch46 at 2025-03-21 11:57 AM | Reply

Unhinged

#25 | Posted by THEBULL at 2025-03-21 11:00 PM | Reply

@#20 ... Wake me up when one of your judges injunctions an air strike or bombing raid. ...

Please add how that is relevant.

thx.

And then there is the "your Judges" thing.

The Judges are using the Constitution as their guide and reference.

What evidence does your current alias have to the contrary?


To wit ...

Chief Judge James E. Boasberg
www.dcd.uscourts.gov

... James Emanuel "Jeb" Boasberg (born 1963)[2] is an American lawyer and jurist who is the chief judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Appointed by President George W. Bush, he served as a judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia from 2002 to 2011, before Barack Obama nominated him to the US district court for the District of Columbia.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts appointed him to the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in 2014, and he served as the presiding judge of the FISC from 2020 to 2021. In 2020, he was appointed to the United States Alien Terrorist Removal Court and designated chief judge. ...




#26 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-03-21 11:20 PM | Reply

Brave Ser Itchy bravely ran away. I get the innuendo, slick. I'm just curious if you've got the sand to actually say it.

#27 | Posted by dutch46 at 2025-03-22 02:45 AM | Reply

Funny how all of a sudden Democrats are concerned about the constitution.

#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Funny how a Trumper s(*&bag like you thinks you were ever concerned about it.

If we survive this onslaught, my hope is worthless sacks of s(*& like you lose your right to vote and any benefits you might gain from a civilized society.

#28 | Posted by jpw at 2025-03-22 03:12 AM | Reply

I don't see this any different than how Biden finally came across a law/act that allowed him to pay off student loans, nothing wrong with that.

Because you're a stupid dishonest piece of s*(&.

F(*& off.

#29 | Posted by jpw at 2025-03-22 03:14 AM | Reply

"We lost an election therefore it's a crisis! *sob*"

You people are unintentionally hilarious.

#16 | Posted by BellRinger

You're intentionally a giant piece of s(*&.

Another worthless -------(*& who deserves to lose every single right they currently enjoy if his boy Trump doesn't work out for him.

#30 | Posted by jpw at 2025-03-22 03:15 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort